Regional Citrate Anticoagulation for Intermittent Hemodialysis in Dogs.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The traditional systemic heparinization used for anticoagulation in extracorporeal therapies may cause fatal complications in animals at risk of bleeding.To develop and validate a protocol of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for intermittent hemodialysis in dogs.A total of 172 dogs treated with hemodialysis for acute kidney injury.In vitro titration was performed, adding trisodium citrate and calcium chloride to heparinized canine blood. A tentative protocol was used first in 66 treatments with additional heparinization and subsequently in 518 heparin-free treatments. Safety and adequacy of RCA were assessed based on clinical and laboratory monitoring, dialyzer pressure gradient, treatment completion, and visual scoring of the extracorporeal circuit.Addition of 1 mmol/L citrate to heparinized blood decreased the ionized calcium concentration by 0.23 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.30) and 1 mmol/L calcium increased it by 0.62 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.45-0.79). Heparin-free treatments were initiated with infusion of trisodium citrate (102 mmol/L) at 2.55 mmol/L blood and calcium chloride (340 mmol/L) at 0.85 mmol/L. Citrate and calcium administrations were adjusted in 27 and 34% of the treatments, respectively. Overall, anticoagulation was satisfactory in 92% of the treatments, with expected azotemia reduction in 95% (urea) and 86% (creatinine), stable dialyzer pressure gradient in 82%, and clean extracorporeal circuits in 92% of the treatments. Eighteen treatments (3.5%) were discontinued prematurely, 9 because of clotting and 9 for reasons unrelated to the RCA procedure.Regional citrate anticoagulation allows safe and efficient heparin-free hemodialysis in dogs at risk of bleeding.
Journal of veterinary internal medicine 20171124 1
<h4>Background</h4>The traditional systemic heparinization used for anticoagulation in extracorporeal therapies may cause fatal complications in animals at risk of bleeding.<h4>Hypothesis/objectives</h4>To develop and validate a protocol of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for intermittent hemodialysis in dogs.<h4>Animals</h4>A total of 172 dogs treated with hemodialysis for acute kidney injury.<h4>Methods</h4>In vitro titration was performed, adding trisodium citrate and calcium chloride ...[more]
Project description:Regional citrate anticoagulation use in intermittent hemodialysis is limited by the increased risk of metabolic complications due to faster solute exchanges than with continuous renal replacement therapies. Several simplifications have been proposed. The objective of this study was to validate a mathematical model of hemodialysis anticoagulated with citrate that was then used to evaluate different prescription scenarios on anticoagulant effectiveness (free calcium concentration in dialysis filter) and calcium balance. A study was conducted in hemodialyzed patients with a citrate infusion into the arterial line and a 1.25 mmol/L calcium dialysate. Calcium and citrate concentrations were measured upstream and downstream of the citrate infusion site and in the venous line. The values measured in the venous lines were compared with those predicted by the model using Bland and Altman diagrams. The model was then used with 22 patients to make simulations. The model can predict the concentration of free calcium, bound to citrate or albumin, accurately. Irrespective of the prescription scenario a decrease in free calcium below 0.4 mmol/L was obtained only in a fraction of the dialysis filter. A zero or slightly negative calcium balance was observed, and should be taken into account in case of prolonged use.
Project description:BackgroundRegional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is the gold standard of anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy but is rarely used for intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) in ICU. Few studies assessed the safety and efficacy of RCA during IHD in ICU; however, no data are available comparing RCA to heparin anticoagulation, which are commonly used for IHD. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of RCA compared to heparin anticoagulation during IHD.MethodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included consecutive ICU patients treated with either heparin anticoagulation (unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin) or RCA for IHD from July to September in 2015 and 2017. RCA was performed with citrate infusion according to blood flow and calcium infusion by diffusive influx from dialysate. Using a propensity score analysis, as the primary endpoint we assessed whether RCA improved efficacy, quantified with Kt/V from the ionic dialysance, compared to heparin anticoagulation. The secondary endpoint was safety. Exploratory analyses were performed on the changes in efficacy and safety between the implementation period (2015) and at long term (2017).ResultsIn total, 208 IHD sessions were performed in 56 patients and were compared (124 RCA and 84 heparin coagulation). There was no difference in Kt/V between RCA and heparin (0.95 ± 0.38 vs. 0.89 ± 0.32; p = 0.98). A higher number of circuit clotting (12.9% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.02) and premature interruption resulting from acute high transmembrane pressure (21% vs. 7%; p = 0.02) occurred in the RCA sessions compared to the heparin sessions. In the propensity score-matching analysis, RCA was associated with an increased risk of circuit clotting (absolute differences = 0.10, 95% CI [0.03-0.18]; p = 0.008). There was no difference in efficacy and safety between the two time periods (2015 and 2017).ConclusionRCA with calcium infusion by diffusive influx from dialysate for IHD was easy to implement with stable long-term efficacy and safety but did not improve efficacy and could be associated with an increased risk of circuit clotting compared to heparin anticoagulation in non-selected ICU patients. Randomized trials to determine the best anticoagulation for IHD in ICU patients should be conducted in a variety of settings.
Project description:IntroductionThe lack of individualized treatment protocols and complicated procedures are important factors limiting the use of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) technology in hemodialysis. This study aims to validate the safety and efficacy of a simplified individualized RCA protocol for hemodialysis.Materials and methodsFrom June 2019 to August 2019, 45 patients with active bleeding or bleeding tendency undergoing maintenance hemodialysis in the Nephrology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were randomly divided into a modified conventional RCA protocol group with a low-flux dialyzer, a simplified individualized RCA protocol group with a high-flux dialyzer, and a simplified individualized RCA protocol group with a low-flux dialyzer.ResultsA total of 45 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 57.38 ± 19.05 years, and 78% were men. Forty-three patients completed 4 hours of hemodialysis, and the median total clotting scores in the 3 groups were 11, 12, and 12. Compared with the modified conventional RCA protocol group with a low-flux dialyzer, the 2 simplified individualized RCA protocol groups had better clotting scores for the dialyzer, arterial bubble trap, and single-pool urea clearance index (spKt/VBUN) and lower costs. Moreover, these parameters did not differ between the 2 simplified individualized RCA protocol groups. No electrolyte or acid-base imbalances or citrate poisoning was observed in any of the 3 groups. Adverse events did not differ significantly among the 3 groups.ConclusionsThe simplified individualized RCA protocol is safe, effective, and easy to implement. Therefore, this protocol can be promoted for clinical practice.Trial registrationThis study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Study Registry under registration number ChiCTR1900023801.
Project description:BackgroundRecommended regular saline flushing presents clinical ineffectiveness for hemodialysis (HD) patients at high risk of bleeding with heparin contraindication. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has previously been used with a Ca2+ containing dialysate with prefiltered citrate in one arm (RCA-one). However, anticoagulation is not always achievable and up to 40% results in serious clotting in the venous expansion chamber. In this study, we have transferred one-quarter of the TSC from the prefiltered to the post filter based on RCA-one, which we have called RCA-two. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of RCA-two with either saline flushing or RCA-one in HD patients with a high bleeding risk.MethodIn this investigator-initiated, multicenter, controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trial, 52 HD patients (77 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-2 and RCA-one group in part one of the trial, and 45 patients (64 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-2 and saline group in part two of the trial. Serious clotting events, adverse events and blood analyses were recorded.ResultsSerious clotting events in the RCA-two group were significantly lower compared with the RCA-one and saline group (7.89% vs. 30.77%, P = 0.011; 3.03% vs. 54.84%, P < 0.001, respectively). The median circuit survival time was 240 min (IQR 240 to 240) in the RCA-two group, was significantly longer than 230 min (IQR 155 to 240, P < 0.001) in the RCA-one group and 210 min (IQR 135 to 240, P = 0.003) in the saline group. The majority of the AEs were hypotension, hypoglycemia and chest tightness, most of which were mild in intensity. Eight patients (20.51%) in the RCA-one group, 4 patients (12.90%) in the saline group and 10 patients (26.31%) in the RCA-two group, P > 0.05.ConclusionsOur data demonstrated that the modified anticoagulation protocol was more effective and feasible during hemodialysis therapy for patients at high risk of bleeding.Trial registrationGDREC, GDREC2017250H. Registered February 2, 2018; retrospectively registered.
Project description:Immune alterations in end-stage renal patients receiving hemodialysis are complex and predispose patients to infections. Anticoagulation may also play an immunomodulatory role in addition to the accumulation of uremic toxins and the effects of the dialysis procedure. Accordingly, it has been recently shown that the infection rate increases in patients under regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) compared with systemic heparin anticoagulation (SHA). We hypothesized that RCA affects the immune status of hemodialysis patients by targeting monocytes. In a cohort of 38 end-stage renal patients undergoing hemodialysis, we demonstrated that whole blood monocytes of patients receiving RCA-but not SHA-failed to upregulate surface activation markers, like human leukocyte antigen class II (HLA-DR), after stressful insults, indicating a state of deactivation during and immediately after dialysis. Additionally, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data and gene set enrichment analysis of pre-dialysis monocytes evidenced a great and complex difference between the groups given that, in the RCA group, monocytes displayed a dramatic transcriptional change with increased expression of genes related to the cell cycle regulation, cellular metabolism, and cytokine signaling, compatible with the reprogramming of the immune response. Transcriptomic changes in pre-dialysis monocytes signalize the lasting nature of the RCA-related effects, suggesting that monocytes are affected even beyond the dialysis session. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate that RCA-but not SHA-impairs the response of monocytes to activation stimuli and alters the immune status of these patients with potential clinical implications.
Project description:PurposeMany intensive care units (ICUs) have transitioned from systemic heparin anticoagulation (SHA) to regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). We evaluated the clinical and health economic impacts of ICU transition to RCA.Materials and methodsWe surveyed all adult general ICUs in England and Wales to identify transition dates and conducted a micro-costing study in eight ICUs. We then conducted an interrupted time-series analysis of linked, routinely collected health records.ResultsIn 69,001 patients who received CKRT (8585 RCA, 60,416 SHA) in 181 ICUs between 2009 and 2017, transition to RCA was not associated with a change in 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.89-1.08) but was associated with step-increases in duration of kidney support (0.53 days, 95% CI 0.28-0.79), advanced cardiovascular support (0.23 days, 95% CI 0.09-0.38) and ICU length of stay (0.86 days, 95% CI 0.24-1.49). The estimated one-year incremental net monetary benefit per patient was £ - 2376 (95% CI £ - 3841-£ - 911), with an estimated likelihood of cost-effectiveness of <0.1%.ConclusionsTransition to RCA was associated with significant increases in healthcare resource use, without corresponding clinical benefit, and is highly unlikely to be cost-effective over a one-year time horizon.
Project description:BACKGROUND:Flexitrate, an innovative regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) protocol, was compared to traditional RCA (tRCA) and Heparin anticoagulation protocols in intensive care patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). METHODS:A single-center, retrospective, cohort study, was done in a 26-bed intensive care unit in a large community hospital. Eighty dialysis sessions (Flexitrate = 2852 h, tRCA = 3580 h and Heparin = 2026 h), performed in 53 patients, were evaluated for filter life, RCA control, and metabolic control. RESULTS:In the Flexitrate cohort, 3.8% of filters clotted, compared to 16.9% with tRCA and 28.3% with Heparin (p < 0.001 for Flexitrate compared to either tRCA or Heparin). Filter survival was significantly improved with Flexitrate compared to tRCA (HR 0.24, p = 0.018) or Heparin (HR 0.14, p = 0.004). Anticoagulation control was superior with Flexitrate with Patient Ionized Calcium out of target a median of 16% of the time, compared to 27% for tRCA (p < 0.001). Filter Ionized Calcium was out of target a median of 6.8% of the time, compared to 23% for tRCA (p = 0.03). Flexitrate produced significantly less alkalosis, hypernatremia, and hypocalcemia than tRCA, and overall metabolic control was comparable to Heparin anticoagulation. The only adverse metabolic outcome with Flexitrate was increased hypomagnesemia. CONCLUSIONS:The Flexitrate protocol extended filter life, delivered more consistent anticoagulation, and provided superior metabolic control compared to a tRCA protocol. Filter life was superior to Heparin anticoagulation, with similar metabolic control. A randomized control trial comparing these protocols is recommended.
Project description:ABSTRACT Background Current ways to diagnose citrate accumulation (CA) in patients receiving regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are confounded by various clinical factors. Serum citrate measurement emerges as a more direct way to diagnose CA, but its clinical utility and optimal cut-off values remain undefined. This study examined serum citrate kinetics and its diagnostic performance for CA in patients receiving RCA CRRT. Methods A multicentre prospective study was carried out in two tertiary referral centre intensive care units in Hong Kong with serum citrate levels measured at baseline and 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h after initiation of RCA CRRT and their relationships with the development of CA. Results Among the 133 patients analysed, 18 patients (13.5%) developed CA. The serum citrate levels at baseline and 2, 6 and 12 h after initiation of RCA CRRT in patients who had CA were significantly higher than the non-CA group (P < .001 for all). The CA group also had higher serum citrate levels than the non-CA group {median 0.93 mmol/L [interquartile range (IQR) 0.81–1.16) versus 0.37 mmol/L (IQR 0.26–0.57), P < .001}. Using a cut-off of 0.85 mmol/L, the serum citrate level had a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity 0.96 for the diagnosis of CA [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) 0.90, P < .001]. The 2-h and 6-h serum citrate levels had good discriminatory abilities for predicting subsequent development of CA (AUROC 0.86 and 0.83 for 2-h and 6-h citrate levels using cut-off values of 0.34 and 0.63 mmol/L, respectively; P < .001). Conclusion Serum citrate levels were significantly higher in patients with CA compared with patients without CA. Serum citrate levels showed good performance in diagnosing and predicting the development of CA. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract
Project description:BackgroundClotting is a major drawback of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) performed on critically ill pediatric patients. Although anticoagulation is recommended to prevent clotting, limited results are available on the effect of each pharmacological strategy in reducing filter clotting in pediatric CRRT. This study defines which anticoagulation strategy, between regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) and systemic anticoagulation with heparin, is safer and more efficient in reducing clotting, patient mortality, and treatment complications during pediatric CRRT.MethodsA systematic literature review was run considering papers published in English until December 2021 and describing patients' and treatments' complications in CRRT performed with heparin and RCA on patients aged less than 18 years.ResultsEleven studies were considered, cumulatively comprising 1.706 CRRT sessions (62% with systemic anticoagulation and 38% with RCA). Studies have consistently identified RCA's superiority over systemic anticoagulation with heparin in prolonging circuit life. The pooled estimate (95% CI) of filter clotting risk showed that RCA is a protective factor for clotting risk (RR = 0.204).ConclusionsRCA has a potential role in prolonging circuit life and seems superior to systemic anticoagulation with heparin in decreasing the risk of circuit clotting during CRRT performed in critically ill pediatric patients.
Project description:Regional citrate anticoagulation during hemodialysis provides an immediate and complete anticoagulant effect, which is limited to the extracorporeal circuit. Citrate has become the standard anticoagulant in acute renal replacement therapy and is widely used in various intermittent hemodialysis modalities, especially for patients with contraindications for heparin. With the increased adoption of medium cut-off membranes, experience with regional citrate anticoagulation is needed. To our knowledge, this is the first report to assess the feasibility of regional citrate anticoagulation in expanded hemodialysis. We prospectively analyzed 5 expanded hemodialysis procedures in 5 patients in which a medium cut-off membrane (Theranova®) was used. We followed our standard citrate protocol developed and tested for high-flux membrane. Anticoagulation was performed with a continuous infusion of 8% trisodium citrate into the arterial line and supplementation of 1 M calcium chloride into the venous line. We monitored ionized calcium and magnesium, sodium and blood gas analysis. Anticoagulation effectiveness was assessed by post-filter ionized calcium and by visual inspection of the anticoagulation in the circuit. There were no prematurely terminated procedures due to anticoagulation-related complications. With a blood flow of 250 mL/min and a dialysate flow of 500 mL/min, we were able to maintain serum ionized calcium in the range of 0.89-1.29 mmol/L and serum sodium in the range of 136-144 mmol/L. The mean pre- and post-dialysis arterial circuit pH was 7.42 (± 0.04) and 7.53 (± 0.23), respectively. The mean pre- and post-dialysis serum ionized magnesium was 0.54 (± 0.04) mmol/L and 0.43 (± 0.03) mmol/L, respectively (measurements were done on a point-of-care ionometer with a lower normal range for ionized magnesium). We have shown that our standard citrate protocol for high-flux hemodialysis membrane could be successfully adopted for use in expanded hemodialysis with a medium cut-off membrane. Overall, electrolyte and acid-base balances were relatively well-controlled and anticoagulation effectiveness was excellent. This is a pilot report with results taken from a larger ongoing trial (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on October 25, 2019 under number NCT04139525) comparing citrate and heparin anticoagulation during expanded hemodialysis.
