Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Third-line treatment and 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review.


ABSTRACT: AIMS:There is a controversy as to the relative efficacy of 177Lu prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) and third-line treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of our systematic review was to elucidate whether 177Lu-PSMA RLT and third-line treatment have similar effects and adverse effects (PROSPERO ID CRD42017067743). METHODS:The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches in Pubmed and Embase selected articles up to September 2017. A search in ClinicalTrials.gov indicated ongoing studies. The meta-analysis used the random-effects model. RESULTS:Twelve studies including 669 patients reported 177Lu-PSMA RLT. Overall, 43% of the patients had a maximum decline of PSA of ?50% following treatment with 177Lu-PSMA RLT. The treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 177Lu-PSMA for imaging and therapy (I&T) had mainly transient adverse effects. Sixteen studies including 1338 patients reported third-line treatment. Overall, 21% of the patients had a best decline of PSA of ?50% following third-line treatment. After third-line treatment with enzalutamide and cabazitaxel, adverse effects caused discontinuation of treatment for 10% to 23% of the patients. 177Lu-PSMA RLT gave a best PSA decline ?50% more often than third-line treatment (mean 44% versus 22%, p?=?0.0002, t test). 177Lu-PSMA RLT gave objective remission more often than third-line treatment (overall 31 of 109 patients versus 43 of 275 patients, p?=?0.004, ?2 test). Median survival was longer after 177Lu-PSMA RLT than after third-line treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant (mean 14 months versus 12 months, p?=?0.32, t test). Adverse effects caused discontinuation of treatment more often for third-line treatment than for 177Lu-PSMA RLT (22 of 66 patients versus 0 of 469 patients, p?

SUBMITTER: von Eyben FE 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5787223 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Third-line treatment and <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review.

von Eyben Finn Edler FE   Roviello Giandomenico G   Kiljunen Timo T   Uprimny Christian C   Virgolini Irene I   Kairemo Kalevi K   Joensuu Timo T  

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 20171216 3


<h4>Aims</h4>There is a controversy as to the relative efficacy of <sup>177</sup>Lu prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) and third-line treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The aim of our systematic review was to elucidate whether <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA RLT and third-line treatment have similar effects and adverse effects (PROSPERO ID CRD42017067743).<h4>Methods</h4>The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Sys  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6451716 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8109776 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10249427 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7730994 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8254689 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9364902 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5356905 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10262652 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8575563 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9311733 | biostudies-literature