Dataset Information

Radiographic cup position following posterior and lateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. An explorative randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT: The two most common surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty are the posterior approach and lateral approach. The surgical approach may influence cup positioning and restoration of the offset, which may affect the biomechanical properties of the hip joint. The primary aim was to compare cup position between posterior approach and lateral approach. Secondary aims were to compare femoral offset, abductor moment arm and leg length discrepancy between the two approaches. Eighty patients with primary hip osteoarthritis were included in a randomized controlled trial and assigned to total hip arthroplasty using posterior approach or lateral approach. Postoperative radiographs from 38 patients in each group were included in this study for measurement of cup anteversion and inclination. Femoral offset, cup offset, total offset, abductor moment arm and leg length discrepancy were measured on preoperative and postoperative radiographs in 28 patients in each group. We found that mean anteversion was 5° larger in the posterior approach group (95% CI, -8.1 to -1.4; p = 0.006), while mean inclination was 5° less steep (95% CI, 2.7 to 7.2; p<0.001) compared with the lateral approach group. The posterior approach group had a larger mean femoral offset of 4.3mm (95% CI, -7.4 to -1.3, p = 0.006), mean total offset of 6.3mm (95% CI, -9.6 to -3; p<0.001) and mean abductor moment arm of 4.8mm (95% CI, -7.6 to -1.9; p = 0.001) compared with the lateral approach group. We found a larger cup anteversion but less steep cup inclination in the posterior approach group compared with the lateral approach group. Femoral offset and abductor moment arm were restored after total hip arthroplasty using lateral approach but significantly increased when using posterior approach.

SUBMITTER: Kruse C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5788339 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Radiographic cup position following posterior and lateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. An explorative randomized controlled trial.

Kruse Christine C Rosenlund Signe S Broeng Leif L Overgaard Søren S

PloS one 20180129 1

The two most common surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty are the posterior approach and lateral approach. The surgical approach may influence cup positioning and restoration of the offset, which may affect the biomechanical properties of the hip joint. The primary aim was to compare cup position between posterior approach and lateral approach. Secondary aims were to compare femoral offset, abductor moment arm and leg length discrepancy between the two approaches. Eighty patients with pr ...[more]

PMID: 29377951

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and Objectives: The uncemented threaded DELTA ST-C cup was introduced in last few years. It has a hemispheric shell, consisting of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. The MINIMA S stem was developed according to the principles of proximal-loading and extended metaphyseal geometry applied to a short stem. The purpose of the study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes and the short- and mid-term survivorship of the DELTA ST-C cup and MINIMA S stem in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The present is the first study to report outcomes and implant survivorship of the DELTA ST-C cup coupled with the MINIMA S femoral stem. Materials and Methods: The present study is a retrospective observational cohort study of a prospectively maintained database, evaluating clinical outcomes and implant survivorship in 95 patients undergoing THA with the MINIMA stem coupled with the DELTA ST-C cup with at least a 3-year follow-up. The clinical evaluation was assessed with a change in the Harris hip score (HHS), while the radiographic evaluation included anteroposterior views of the pelvis and lateral views of the affected hip. Results: The enrolled population's mean age was 69.3 years and most patients were female (64%). The MINIMA S standard stem was implanted in 68 patients (72%), the lateralized stem was implanted in 27 (28%), and the mean acetabular inclination was 48.2°. The HHS improved significantly from the preoperative value (median 46, IQR: 38-55), already at 1 month after surgery (median 76, IQR: 66-77), reaching excellent results at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively (median 96, IQR: 91-100). X-rays demonstrated good implant stability and biomechanics parameter restorations revealed no sign of subsidence, and the presence of radiolucent lines greater than 2 mm in the short stem area in five cases and in the acetabulum in one were not clinically significant. No revisions have been performed so far. Conclusions: The MINIMA S stem coupled with the DELTA ST-C cup demonstrated very good clinical and radiological results with a significant increase of the Harris hip score at short- and mid-term follow-up. This is the first study evaluating the DELTA ST-C cup, showing promising outcomes during the study's follow-up. The MINIMA S stem has been evaluated in a very few studies. However, the combination with this particular cup had not yet been studied. The design of the stem and the cup ensures primary stability and excellent early term outcomes, moreover the study demonstrates extraordinary implant survivorship, equal to 100%.

Project description:Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between the acetabular cup position and the risk of dislocation, wear and range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. The present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the surgeon's estimated position of the cup after freehand placement in total hip replacement. Peroperative estimated abduction and anteversion of 200 acetabular components (placed by three orthopaedic surgeons and nine residents) were compared with measured outcomes (according to Pradhan) on postoperative radiographs. Cups were placed in 49.7 degrees (SD 6.7) of abduction and 16.0 degrees (SD 8.1) of anteversion. Estimation of placement was 46.3 degrees (SD 4.3) of abduction and 14.6 degrees (SD 5.9) of anteversion. Of more interest is the fact that for the orthopaedic surgeons the mean inaccuracy of estimation was 4.1 degrees (SD 3.9) for abduction and 5.2 degrees (SD 4.5) for anteversion and for their residents this was respectively, 6.3 degrees (SD 4.6) and 5.7 degrees (SD 5.0). Significant differences were found between orthopaedic surgeons and residents for inaccuracy of estimation for abduction, not for anteversion. Body mass index, sex, (un)cemented fixation and surgical approach (anterolateral or posterolateral) were not significant factors. Based upon the inaccuracy of estimation, the group's chance on future cup placement within Lewinnek's safe zone (5-25 degrees anteversion and 30-50 degrees abduction) is 82.7 and 85.2% for anteversion and abduction separately. When both parameters are combined, the chance of accurate placement is only 70.5%. The chance of placement of the acetabular component within 5 degrees of an intended position, for both abduction and anteversion is 21.5% this percentage decreases to just 2.9% when the tolerated error is 1 degrees . There is a tendency to underestimate both abduction and anteversion. Orthopaedic surgeons are superior to their residents in estimating abduction of the acetabular component. The results of this study indicate that freehand placement of the acetabular component is not a reliable method.

Dataset Information

Radiographic cup position following posterior and lateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. An explorative randomized controlled trial.

Publications

Radiographic cup position following posterior and lateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. An explorative randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets