Dataset Information

Association of Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation With Alzheimer Disease Stage in Apolipoprotein E ?4 Carriers: A Review.

ABSTRACT: The apolipoprotein E ?4 (APOE4) allele identifies a unique population that is at significant risk for developing Alzheimer disease (AD). Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is an essential ?-3 fatty acid that is critical to the formation of neuronal synapses and membrane fluidity. Observational studies have associated ?-3 intake, including DHA, with a reduced risk for incident AD. In contrast, randomized clinical trials of ?-3 fatty acids have yielded mixed and inconsistent results. Interactions among DHA, APOE genotype, and stage of AD pathologic changes may explain the mixed results of DHA supplementation reported in the literature.Although randomized clinical trials of ?-3 in symptomatic AD have had negative findings, several observational and clinical trials of ?-3 in the predementia stage of AD suggest that ?-3 supplementation may slow early memory decline in APOE4 carriers. Several mechanisms by which the APOE4 allele could alter the delivery of DHA to the brain may be amenable to DHA supplementation in predementia stages of AD. Evidence of accelerated DHA catabolism (eg, activation of phospholipases and oxidation pathways) could explain the lack of efficacy of ?-3 supplementation in AD dementia. The association of cognitive benefit with DHA supplementation in predementia but not AD dementia suggests that early ?-3 supplementation may reduce the risk for or delay the onset of AD symptoms in APOE4 carriers. Recent advances in brain imaging may help to identify the optimal timing for future DHA clinical trials.High-dose DHA supplementation in APOE4 carriers before the onset of AD dementia can be a promising approach to decrease the incidence of AD. Given the safety profile, availability, and affordability of DHA supplements, refining an ?-3 intervention in APOE4 carriers is warranted.

SUBMITTER: Yassine HN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5812012 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association of Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation With Alzheimer Disease Stage in Apolipoprotein E ε4 Carriers: A Review.

Yassine Hussein N HN Braskie Meredith N MN Mack Wendy J WJ Castor Katherine J KJ Fonteh Alfred N AN Schneider Lon S LS Harrington Michael G MG Chui Helena C HC

JAMA neurology 20170301 3

<h4>Importance</h4>The apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) allele identifies a unique population that is at significant risk for developing Alzheimer disease (AD). Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is an essential ω-3 fatty acid that is critical to the formation of neuronal synapses and membrane fluidity. Observational studies have associated ω-3 intake, including DHA, with a reduced risk for incident AD. In contrast, randomized clinical trials of ω-3 fatty acids have yielded mixed and inconsistent results. In ...[more]

PMID: 28114437

Similar Datasets

Project description:ContextDocosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is the most abundant long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid in the brain. Epidemiological studies suggest that consumption of DHA is associated with a reduced incidence of Alzheimer disease. Animal studies demonstrate that oral intake of DHA reduces Alzheimer-like brain pathology.ObjectiveTo determine if supplementation with DHA slows cognitive and functional decline in individuals with Alzheimer disease.Design, setting, and patientsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of DHA supplementation in individuals with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (Mini-Mental State Examination scores, 14-26) was conducted between November 2007 and May 2009 at 51 US clinical research sites of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study.InterventionParticipants were randomly assigned to algal DHA at a dose of 2 g/d or to identical placebo (60% were assigned to DHA and 40% were assigned to placebo). Duration of treatment was 18 months.Main outcome measuresChange in the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) and change in the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) sum of boxes. Rate of brain atrophy was also determined by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging in a subsample of participants (n = 102).ResultsA total of 402 individuals were randomized and a total of 295 participants completed the trial while taking study medication (DHA: 171; placebo: 124). Supplementation with DHA had no beneficial effect on rate of change on ADAS-cog score, which increased by a mean of 7.98 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.51-9.45 points) for the DHA group during 18 months vs 8.27 points (95% CI, 6.72-9.82 points) for the placebo group (linear mixed-effects model: P = .41). The CDR sum of boxes score increased by 2.87 points (95% CI, 2.44-3.30 points) for the DHA group during 18 months compared with 2.93 points (95% CI, 2.44-3.42 points) for the placebo group (linear mixed-effects model: P = .68). In the subpopulation of participants (DHA: 53; placebo: 49), the rate of brain atrophy was not affected by treatment with DHA. Individuals in the DHA group had a mean decline in total brain volume of 24.7 cm(3) (95% CI, 21.4-28.0 cm(3)) during 18 months and a 1.32% (95% CI, 1.14%-1.50%) volume decline per year compared with 24.0 cm(3) (95% CI, 20-28 cm(3)) for the placebo group during 18 months and a 1.29% (95% CI, 1.07%-1.51%) volume decline per year (P = .79).ConclusionSupplementation with DHA compared with placebo did not slow the rate of cognitive and functional decline in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00440050.

Project description:Importance:Older age, high levels of ?-amyloid (A?), and the presence of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ?4 allele are risk factors for Alzheimer disease (AD). However, the extent to which increasing age, A?, and ?4 are associated with memory decline remains unclear, and the age at which memory decline begins for A?-positive ?4 carriers and noncarriers has not been determined. Objective:To determine the association of age, A? level, and APOE ?4 with memory decline in a large group of cognitively healthy older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants:This longitudinal observational study included cognitively healthy older adults (age >60 years) enrolled in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study from March 31, 2006, through March 31, 2017; of 1583 individuals enrolled, 1136 refused or were excluded owing to other criteria (eg, having mild cognitive impairment or AD). Participants underwent A? imaging in research clinics in Perth and Melbourne and more than 72 months of follow-up (at 18-month intervals). The association of age with memory was fitted to a quadratic model. Age was treated as a continuous, time-dependent variable. Exposures:?-Amyloid imaging using positron emission tomography, genotyping for APOE ?4, and longitudinal neuropsychological assessments of episodic memory during the 72-month follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures:Episodic memory composite score. Results:Of the 447 participants, 203 (45.4%) were men and 244 (54.6%) were women; mean (SD) age was 72.5 (6.6) years. Equal proportions of female participants were observed in each A?-?4 group (24 of 51 A?-positive ?4 noncarriers [47.1%] ; 35 of 64 A?-negative ?4 carriers [54.7%]; 40 of 72 A?-positive ?4 carriers [55.6%]; and 145 of 260 A?-negative ?4 noncarriers [55.8%]). Adults with A? findings (mean [SD] age, 74.4 [6.8] years) were approximately 4 years older than those negative for A? (mean [SD] age, 69.8 [6.1] years). Memory decline diverged significantly from A?-negative ?4 noncarriers at an earlier age in A?-positive ?4 carriers (64.5 years) than in A?-positive ?4 noncarriers (76.5 years), such that by 85 years of age, A?-positive ?4 carriers performed approximately 1.5 SD units worse on the episodic memory composite than A?-negative ?4 noncarriers and approximately 0.8 SD units worse than A?-positive ?4 noncarriers. Memory performance of A?-negative ?4 carriers did not differ from that of the A?-negative ?4 noncarriers (estimate [SE], 0.001 [0.001]; t?=?0.526; P?=?.77). Conclusions and Relevance:Prior work has shown that A? and ?4 combine to influence memory decline in nondemented older adults. Results of this study indicate that increasing age may further exacerbate these effects. The estimates provided may be used to determine the risk of memory decline associated with A? and ?4 at each age.

Project description:Importance:The association between peripheral inflammatory biomarkers and Alzheimer disease (AD) is not consistent in the literature. It is possible that chronic inflammation, rather than 1 episode of inflammation, interacts with genetic vulnerability to increase the risk for AD. Objective:To study the interaction between the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype and chronic low-grade inflammation and its association with the incidence of AD. Design, Setting, and Participants:In this cohort study, data from 2656 members of the Framingham Heart Study offspring cohort (Generation 2; August 13, 1971-November 27, 2017) were evaluated, including longitudinal measures of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), diagnoses of incident dementia including AD, and brain volume. Chronic low-grade inflammation was defined as having CRP at a high cutoff level at a minimum of 2 time points. Statistical analysis was performed from December 1, 1979, to December 31, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures:Development of AD and brain volumes. Results:Of the 3130 eligible participants, 2656 (84.9%; 1227 men and 1429 women; mean [SD] age at last CRP measurement, 61.6 [9.5] years) with both ApoE status and longitudinal CRP measurements were included in this study analysis. Median (interquartile range) CRP levels increased with mean (SD) age (43.3 [9.6] years, 0.95 mg/L [0.40-2.35 mg/L] vs 59.1 [9.6] years, 2.04 mg/L [0.93-4.75 mg/L] vs 61.6 [9.5] years, 2.21 mg/L [1.05-5.12 mg/L]; P?<?.001), but less so among those with ApoE4 alleles, followed by ApoE3 then ApoE2 genotypes. During the 17 years of follow-up, 194 individuals (7.3%) developed dementia, 152 (78.4%) of whom had AD. ApoE4 coupled with chronic low-grade inflammation, defined as a CRP level of 8 mg/L or higher, was associated with an increased risk of AD, especially in the absence of cardiovascular diseases (hazard ratio, 6.63; 95% CI, 1.80-24.50; P?=?.005), as well as an increased risk of earlier disease onset compared with ApoE4 carriers without chronic inflammation (hazard ratio, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.27-9.75; P?=?.009). This phenomenon was not observed among ApoE3 and ApoE2 carriers with chronic low-grade inflammation. Finally, a subset of 1761 individuals (66.3%) underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging, and the interaction between ApoE4 and chronic low-grade inflammation was associated with brain atrophy in the temporal lobe (??=?-0.88, SE?=?0.22; P?<?.001) and hippocampus (??=?-0.04, SE?=?0.01; P?=?.005), after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions and Relevance:In this study, peripheral chronic low-grade inflammation in participants with ApoE4 was associated with shortened latency for onset of AD. Rigorously treating chronic systemic inflammation based on genetic risk could be effective for the prevention and intervention of AD.

Dataset Information

Association of Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation With Alzheimer Disease Stage in Apolipoprotein E ?4 Carriers: A Review.

Publications

Association of Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation With Alzheimer Disease Stage in Apolipoprotein E ε4 Carriers: A Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets