Dataset Information

Validation of genotype imputation in Southeast Asian populations and the effect of single nucleotide polymorphism annotation on imputation outcome.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Imputation involves the inference of untyped single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genome-wide association studies. The haplotypic reference of choice for imputation in Southeast Asian populations is unclear. Moreover, the influence of SNP annotation on imputation results has not been examined. METHODS:This study was divided into two parts. In the first part, we applied imputation to genotyped SNPs from Southeast Asian populations from the Pan-Asian SNP database. Five percent of the total SNPs were removed. The remaining SNPs were applied to imputation with IMPUTE2. The imputed outcomes were verified with the removed SNPs. We compared imputation references from Chinese and Japanese haplotypes from the HapMap phase II (HMII) and the complete set of haplotypes from the 1000 Genomes Project (1000G). The second part was imputation accuracy and yield in Thai patient dataset. Half of the autosomal SNPs was removed to create Set 1. Another dataset, Set 2, was then created where we switched which half of the SNPs were removed. Both Set 1 and Set 2 were imputed with HMII to create a complete imputed SNPs dataset. The dataset was used to validate association testing, SNPs annotation and imputation outcome. RESULTS:The accuracy was highest for all populations when using the HMII reference, but at the cost of a lower yield. Thai genotypes showed the highest accuracy over other populations in both HMII and 1000G panels, although accuracy and yield varied across chromosomes. Imputation was tested in a clinical dataset to compare accuracy in gene-related regions, and coding regions were found to have a higher accuracy and yield. CONCLUSIONS:This work provides the first evidence of imputation reference selection for Southeast Asian studies and highlights the effects of SNP locations respective to genes on imputation outcome. Researchers will need to consider the trade-off between accuracy and yield in future imputation studies.

SUBMITTER: Lert-Itthiporn W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5812212 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Validation of genotype imputation in Southeast Asian populations and the effect of single nucleotide polymorphism annotation on imputation outcome.

Lert-Itthiporn Worachart W Suktitipat Bhoom B Grove Harald H Sakuntabhai Anavaj A Malasit Prida P Tangthawornchaikul Nattaya N Matsuda Fumihiko F Suriyaphol Prapat P

BMC medical genetics 20180213 1

<h4>Background</h4>Imputation involves the inference of untyped single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genome-wide association studies. The haplotypic reference of choice for imputation in Southeast Asian populations is unclear. Moreover, the influence of SNP annotation on imputation results has not been examined.<h4>Methods</h4>This study was divided into two parts. In the first part, we applied imputation to genotyped SNPs from Southeast Asian populations from the Pan-Asian SNP database. Fi ...[more]

PMID: 29439659

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundGenotype imputation is a cost-effective method to generate sequence-level genotypes for a large number of animals. Its application can improve the power of genomic studies, provided that the accuracy of imputation is sufficiently high. The purpose of this study was to develop an optimal strategy for genotype imputation from genotyping array data to sequence level in German warmblood horses, and to investigate the effect of different factors on the accuracy of imputation. Publicly available whole-genome sequence data from 317 horses of 46 breeds was used to conduct the analyses.ResultsDepending on the size and composition of the reference panel, the accuracy of imputation from medium marker density (60K) to sequence level using the software Beagle 5.1 ranged from 0.64 to 0.70 for horse chromosome 3. Generally, imputation accuracy increased as the size of the reference panel increased, but if genetically distant individuals were included in the panel, the accuracy dropped. Imputation was most precise when using a reference panel of multiple but related breeds and the software Beagle 5.1, which outperformed the other two tested computer programs, Impute 5 and Minimac 4. Genome-wide imputation for this scenario resulted in a mean accuracy of 0.66. Stepwise imputation from 60K to 670K markers and subsequently to sequence level did not improve the accuracy of imputation. However, imputation from higher density (670K) was considerably more accurate (about 0.90) than from medium density. Likewise, imputation in genomic regions with a low marker coverage resulted in a reduced accuracy of imputation.ConclusionsThe accuracy of imputation in horses was influenced by the size and composition of the reference panel, the marker density of the genotyping array, and the imputation software. Genotype imputation can be used to extend the limited amount of available sequence-level data from horses in order to boost the power of downstream analyses, such as genome-wide association studies, or the detection of embryonic lethal variants.

Dataset Information

Validation of genotype imputation in Southeast Asian populations and the effect of single nucleotide polymorphism annotation on imputation outcome.

Publications

Validation of genotype imputation in Southeast Asian populations and the effect of single nucleotide polymorphism annotation on imputation outcome.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets