Dataset Information

Role of Hospital Volumes in Identifying Low-Performing and High-Performing Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgical Centers in the United States.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Identifying high-performing surgical valve centers with the best surgical outcomes is challenging. Hospital surgical volume is a frequently used surrogate for outcomes. However, its ability to distinguish low-performing and high-performing hospitals remains unknown.

Objective

To examine the association of hospital procedure volume with hospital performance for aortic and mitral valve (MV) surgical procedures.

Design, setting, and participants

Within an all-payer nationally representative data set of inpatient hospitalizations, this study identified 682 unique hospitals performing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and MV replacement and repair with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2007 and 2011. Procedural outcomes were further assessed for a 10-year period (2005-2014) to assess representativeness of study period.

Main outcomes and measures

In-hospital risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR) calculated using hierarchical models and an empirical bayesian approach with volume-based shrinkage that allowed for reliability adjustment.

Results

At 682 US hospitals, 70 295 SAVR, 19 913 MV replacement, and 17 037 MV repair procedures were performed between 2007 and 2011, with a median annual volume of 43 (interquartile range [IQR], 23-76) SAVR, 13 (IQR, 6-22) MV replacement, and 9 (IQR, 4-19) MV repair procedures. Of 225 SAVR hospitals in the highest-volume tertile, 34.7% and 36.0% were in the highest-RSMR tertile for SAVR + CABG and isolated SAVR procedures, respectively, while 21.5% and 17.5% of the 228 SAVR hospitals in the lowest-volume tertile were in the lowest respective RSMR tertile. Similarly, 36.8% and 43.5% of hospitals in the highest tertile of volume for MV replacement and repair, respectively, were in the corresponding highest-RSMR tertile, and 17.4% and 11.2% of the low-volume hospitals were in the lowest-RSMR tertile for MV replacement and repair, respectively. There was limited correlation between outcomes for SAVR and MV procedures at an institution. If solely volume-based tertiles were used to categorize hospitals for quality, 44.7% of all valve hospitals would be misclassified (as either low performing or high performing) when assessing performance based on tertiles of RSMR.

Conclusions and relevance

Hospital procedure volume alone frequently misclassifies hospital performance with regard to risk-standardized outcomes after aortic and MV surgical procedures. Valve surgery quality improvement endeavors should focus on a more comprehensive assessment that includes risk-adjusted outcomes rather than hospital volume alone.

SUBMITTER: Khera R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5815001 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceEarly surgery for severe primary degenerative mitral regurgitation is recommended, provided optimal outcomes are achievable. Contemporary national data defining mitral valve surgery volume and outcomes are lacking.ObjectiveTo assess national 30-day and 1-year outcomes of mitral valve surgery and define the hospital- and surgeon-level volume-outcome association with mitral valve repair or replacement (MVRR) in patients with primary mitral regurgitation.Design, setting, and participantsThis multicenter cross-sectional observational study used the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to identify patients undergoing isolated MVRR for primary mitral regurgitation in the United States. Operative data were collected from July 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016, and analyzed from March 1 to July 1, 2019, with data linked to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital operative mortality after isolated MVRR for primary mitral regurgitation. Secondary outcomes were 30-day composite mortality plus morbidity (any occurrence of bleeding, stroke, prolonged ventilation, renal failure, or deep wound infection), rate of successful mitral valve repair of primary mitral regurgitation (residual mitral regurgitation of mild [1+] or better), and 1-year mortality, reoperation, and rehospitalization for heart failure.ResultsA total of 55 311 patients, 1094 hospitals, and 2410 surgeons were identified. Increasing hospital and surgeon volumes were associated with lower risk-adjusted 30-day mortality, lower 30-day composite mortality plus morbidity, and higher rate of successful repair. The lowest vs highest hospital volume quartile had higher 1-year risk-adjusted mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61, 95% CI, 1.31-1.98), but not mitral reoperation (odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% CI, 0.81-2.78) or hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.96-1.64). The surgeon-level 1-year volume-outcome associations were similar for mortality (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.32-1.94) but not significant for mitral reoperation (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.60-2.18) or hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.91-1.50).Conclusions and relevanceNational hospital- and surgeon-level inverse volume-outcome associations were observed for 30-day and 1-year mortality after mitral valve surgery for primary mitral regurgitation. These findings may help to define access to experienced centers and surgeons for the management of primary mitral regurgitation.

Project description:Importance:Volume metrics may have relevance in the evaluation of valve center expertise. However, a paucity of data exists regarding the quantity, volume, and geographic location of mitral valve (MV) surgical centers in the United States and the proportion of underserved populations they treat. Objectives:To evaluate the hospital, patient, and procedural characteristics of mitral valve repair or replacement (MVRR) in the United States as a function of hospital procedure volume. Design, Setting, and Participants:This cross-sectional, multicenter observational study was conducted from July 2014 to June 2018. Patients in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database undergoing any surgical procedure involving MVRR in the United States were included. Main Outcomes and Measures:Volume distribution of MVRR by hospital and hospital referral region. Results:There were 165?405 MVRRs performed in 1082 centers during the study period, of which 86?488 (52.3%) were MV repairs. There were 575 centers (53.1%) that performed 25 or more MVRRs per year. The geographic distribution of centers performing 25 or more MVRRs per year differed from those performing fewer than 25 MVRRs per year. Of 304 designated hospital referral regions, 235 (77.3%) had at least 1 center performing 25 or more MVRRs per year, representing accessibility to 1 or more such centers for 296.4 million of 320.1 million US residents (92.6% of the US population; Midwest, 60.0 million of 68.0 million [88.4%]; South, 112.6 million of 122.6 million [91.9%]; West, 68.6 million of 72.9 million [94.1%]; and Northeast, 54.9 million of 56.6 million [97.1%]). Of 304 hospital referral regions, 168 (55.3%) had at least 1 center performing 40 or more MVRRs per year, representing accessibility to 1 or more such centers for 259.8 million of 317.90 million (81.7%) of the US population (Midwest, 50.5 million of 67.9 million [74.5%]; South, 94.5 million of 121.1 million [78.1%]; West, 64.0 million of 72.8 million [88.0%]; Northeast, 50.1 million of 56.3 million [90.2%]). More black and Hispanic patients received operations in centers performing 25 or more MVRRs per year (22?984) vs those performing fewer than 25 MVRRs per year (3227), yet the proportion was higher in lower-volume centers (22?984 of 148?385 [15.5%] vs 3227 of 17?020 [19.0%]; P?<?.001). In centers performing 25 or more MVRRs per year vs fewer than 25 MVRRs per year, there was a lower percentage of Medicare and Medicaid patients (47?920 of 148?385 [32.3%] vs 6183 of 17?020 [.3%]; P?<?.001) and patients from rural zip codes (21?208 of 148?385 [14.3%] vs 3146 of 17?020 [18.5%]; P?<?.001). Conclusions and Relevance:Fifty-three percent of all centers performed 25 or more MVRRs per year, and 92.6% of the US population lived in an hospital referral region with at least 1 such center. Disparities in race/ethnicity, rurality, and insurance status exist among patients being treated at centers with different volumes. These data indicate that efforts to centralize care based on volume metrics will need to balance access vs quality.