Dataset Information

Rethinking Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Chronic Pulmonary Insufficiency and Combined Cardiopulmonary Insufficiency.

ABSTRACT: Almost 70 years ago, Drs. Baldwin, Cournand, and Richards defined chronic pulmonary insufficiency by the presence of respiratory symptoms, radiologic evidence of pulmonary emphysema on chest radiography, and physiologic gas trapping. A decade later, airflow obstruction on spirometry was added to the definition and insufficiency became a disease. Contemporary studies are reviving the diagnostic approach described by these early luminaries, with researchers finding that symptomatic smokers with preserved spirometry have increased exacerbations and that smokers and non-smokers with normal spirometry but emphysema on chest computed tomography have increased mortality. Hence, the Baldwin-Cournand-Richards concept of disease defined by respiratory symptoms, radiologic findings, and physiology-regardless of spirometric criteria-is being rediscovered. Baldwin, Cournand, and Richards also stated that "functionally, it is obvious that the pulmonary and circulatory apparatus are one unit," and they defined combined cardiopulmonary insufficiency as chronic pulmonary insufficiency with (left or right) cardiac and pulmonary artery enlargement. They appreciated the complexity of these interactions, which include the potential role of gas trapping in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; the impact of emphysema on blood flow in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; multiple contributions to cor pulmonale with increased pulmonary artery pressure; and cor pulmonale parvus in emphysema; all of which may be amenable to specific therapeutic interventions. Given the complexity of heart-lung interactions originally identified by Baldwin, Cournand, and Richards and the potentially large therapeutic opportunities, large-scale studies are still warranted to find specific therapies for subphenotypes of combined cardiopulmonary insufficiency.

SUBMITTER: Barr RG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5822396 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Take-home summaryPersonalized pulmonary rehabilitation including occupational therapy improves the prognosis of patients with advanced COPD.PurposeWe previously reported that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exhibit three exercise-induced life-threatening conditions: hypoxemia, sympathetic overactivity, and respiratory acidosis. We aimed to verify whether mortality in patients with advanced COPD could be reduced by a personalized pulmonary rehabilitation (PPR) program in hospital, which determines individual safe ranges and includes occupational therapy (PPR-OT), to prevent desaturation and sympathetic nerve activation during daily activities.Patients and methodsThe novel PPR-OT program was evaluated in a retrospective study of patients with COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] Grade D) who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) between April 1990 and December 1999. They received regular treatment without the proposed therapy (control group: n=61; male-to-female ratio [M:F] =57:4; mean age: 68.5±6.7 years) or with the proposed therapy (PPR-OT group: n=46; M:F =44:2; mean age: 68.7±7.1 years). A prospective observational study included patients with COPD receiving home oxygen therapy (HOT) between April 1995 and March 2007 to compare the survival rates of the control group (n=47; M:F ratio =34:13; mean age: 71.3±10.0 years) and the PPR-OT group (n=85; M:F =78:7; mean age: 70.7±6.1 years) who completed the proposed therapy. Survival after CPET or HOT was analyzed using Cox proportional-hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.ResultsIn both studies, the program significantly improved all-cause mortality (retrospective study: risk ratio =0.389 [range: 0.172-0.800]; P=0.0094; log-rank test, P=0.0094; observational study: risk ratio =0.515 [range: 0.296-0.933]; P=0.0291; log-rank test, P=0.0232]. At 5 years and 7 years, all-cause mortality was extremely low in patients in the PPR-OT group receiving HOT (18.8% and 28.2%, respectively), compared to that in the control group (34.0% and 44.7%, respectively). Survival of patients with life-threatening pathophysiological conditions also greatly improved.ConclusionThe PPR-OT program improved the survival of patients with advanced COPD probably because it modified life-threatening conditions.

Dataset Information

Rethinking Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Chronic Pulmonary Insufficiency and Combined Cardiopulmonary Insufficiency.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets