Project description:Study objectivesAdherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remains a challenge in children. We hypothesized that the presence of another family member on PAP therapy (parent, sibling, other family member) would be associated with better adherence in the child.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review to identify children < 18 years of age who had a new diagnosis of OSA between Jan 2011 and May 2013. Outcomes were objective PAP adherence at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Potential predictors included family member on PAP therapy, patient demographics, and clinical characteristics. Group differences between children with and without a family member on PAP therapy were determined using χ(2) test and Wilcoxon two-sample test. PAP adherence measures at each time point and patterns of change across time between the two groups were examined using mixed-effects models.ResultsThe final analytic sample included 56 children: age 13.2 ± 3.7 years, 60% male, 67% African American, 65% obese, and 32% with developmental disabilities. The mean obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was 25.2 ± 28.7, and 19 (33%) had a family member on PAP therapy. Overall PAP adherence was 2.8 ± 2.4 h/night at 3 months. At month 3, the group with a family member on PAP therapy had significantly greater average nightly PAP use on all nights (3.6 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.39) and on nights used (4.8 ± 0.6 vs. 3.8 ± 0.40); (p value = 0.04).ConclusionsOverall PAP adherence was low, but having a family member on PAP therapy as a "role model" was associated with better adherence.CommentaryA commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 941.
Project description:Background and Purpose- Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea may improve stroke recovery, but adherence is poor. We assessed the effectiveness of an intensive CPAP adherence program during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation on 3-month adherence and stroke recovery. Methods- In a single-arm study, 90 stroke rehabilitation patients were enrolled into an intensive CPAP adherence program. CPAP was continued after a run-in among qualifying patients with evidence of obstructive sleep apnea. The primary outcome was CPAP adherence, defined as ≥4 hours of use on ≥70% of days, over 3 months. Results- A total of 62 patients qualified for continued CPAP and 52 of these were willing to continue CPAP after discharge from rehabilitation. At 3 months, the average daily CPAP use was 4.7 hours (SD 2.6), and 32/52 (62%) patients were adherent. Factors significantly associated with adherence included more severe stroke, aphasia, and white race. Compared with nonadherent patients, adherent patients experienced greater improvements in the cognitive component of the Functional Independence Measure ( P=0.02) and in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ( P=0.03). Conclusions- This intensive CPAP adherence program initiated during stroke rehabilitation can lead to CPAP adherence in the majority of patients with evidence of obstructive sleep apnea, including those with more severe stroke and aphasia, and may promote recovery. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02809430.
Project description:Study objectivesDecreased early positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence is predictive of poor long-term adherence. We hypothesized that cloud-based sleep coaches (CBSC) providing protocol-driven live telephone contact with patients starting treatment would improve early adherence.MethodsAt PAP set-up patients were randomized to: (1) standard care (SC) including respiratory therapist PAP setup, wireless adherence monitoring, and elective use of a mobile adherence feedback application (PAPapp); or (2) SC+CBSC. Primary 3-month endpoints were adherence (all nights, nights used, % of nights ≥ 4 hours use, and % participants with ≥ 4 hours use on ≥ 70% of nights [% ≥ 4 ≥ 70%]) and secondary endpoints were change in Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) and satisfaction with treatment and PAPapp use.ResultsTwo hundred fifty participants were randomized (SC 126, SC+CBSC 124). Characteristics SC versus SC+CBSC (mean ± SD) for age (55.2 ± 13.4 versus 54.9 ± 11.5 years), diagnostic apnea-hypopnea index (36.7 ± 21.1 versus 36.6 ± 20.6 events/h), and ESS (10.8 ± 6.1 versus 11.2 ± 6.0) did not differ. At 3 months, the % of days with ≥ 4 hours of PAP use (SC: 48.1 ± 36.8% versus SC+CBSC: 57.9 ± 35.4%, P = 0.032), use all nights (SC:3.7 ± 2.7 hours versus SC + CBSC: 4.4 ± 2.6 hours, P=0.027), and PAPapp use satisfaction were greater with SC+CBSC (intention to treat analysis). The [% ≥ 4 ≥ 70%] did not differ between groups in the intention to treat analysis but was higher in those completing CBSC interventions. The ESS improvement and patient satisfaction did not differ between groups.ConclusionsThe CBSC system improved PAP adherence at 3 months.Clinical trial registrationRegistry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Title: ThErapy Adherence Management in Veterans; Identifier: NCT03243487; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03243487.
Project description:Study objectivesChildren with obstructive sleep apnea are increasingly being treated with positive airway pressure (PAP), particularly if they have underlying medical conditions. Although PAP is an effective treatment, its use is challenging due to poor adherence. We hypothesized that demographic, psychosocial, and polysomnographic parameters would be related to PAP adherence. We therefore prospectively collected data potentially pertaining to PAP adherence, and correlated it with PAP use.MethodsFifty-six patients and their parents completed a series of psychosocial questionnaires prior to PAP initiation. Objective adherence data were obtained after 1 and 3 months of PAP use.ResultsThe population was primarily obese; 23% had neurodevelopmental disabilities. PAP adherence varied widely, with PAP being worn 22 ± 8 nights in month-1, but mean use was only 3 ± 3 h/night. The greatest predictor of use was maternal education (p = 0.002 for nights used; p = 0.033 for mean h used/night). Adherence was lower in African American children vs other races (p = 0.021). In the typically developing subgroup, adherence correlated inversely with age. Adherence did not correlate with severity of apnea, pressure levels, or psychosocial parameters other than a correlation between family social support and nights of PAP use in month-3.ConclusionsPAP adherence in children and adolescents is related primarily to family and demographic factors rather than severity of apnea or measures of psychosocial functioning. Further research is needed to determine the relative contributions of maternal education, socioeconomic status and cultural beliefs to PAP adherence in children, in order to develop better adherence programs.
Project description:BackgroundPositive airway pressure (PAP) has become a prominent treatment for children with sleep-disordered breathing. However, there are no large-scale studies to clarify whether PAP is well tolerated in children, and which factors are associated with better adherence to PAP therapy. In this study, we aimed to clarify adherence patterns of PAP therapy in a large paediatric population.MethodsWe did a cross-sectional big-data analysis in children from Oct 1, 2014, to Aug 1, 2018, using existing data derived from PAP devices uploaded nightly in the AirView cloud database. The AirView database is a usage tracking system available to all patients who are assigned PAP therapy, which requires consent from the patient or parent or guardian. All patients older than 4 years and younger than 18 years who used continuous or automated PAP devices were evaluated. Only patients living in the USA and enrolled with a single insurance company were included. If patients were participating in an engagement programme, programme onset must have been within 7 days of therapy onset. Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients who used PAP continuously over 90 days. The primary outcome was assessed in all patients who met the age inclusion criterion and had reliable age data available. Data on missing PAP use were imputed as zero, but data on other metrics were not imputed and excluded from analysis.FindingsWe used data recorded from Oct 1, 2014, to Aug 1, 2018. Of 40 140 children screened, 36 058 (89·8%) were US residents and 20 553 (90·1%) of them met the eligibility criteria and had accessible data (mean age 13·0 years [SD 3·7]). On the basis of 90 days of monitoring data, 12 699 (61·8%) patients continuously used PAP. Factors significantly associated with adherence included age group, residual apnoea-hypopnoea index, use and onset of patient engagement programmes, PAP pressure, and nightly median PAP mask leak, all over the 90-day study period.InterpretationTo our knowledge, our study represents the largest analysis of children using PAP therapy to date. The findings suggest that adherence to PAP therapy is lower than in previous reports from adults. However, numerous actionable factors were associated with improvements in adherence and should be used strategically in clinical decision making to improve PAP adherence in children.FundingResMed.
Project description:Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is a commonly prescribed treatment for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Negative health consequences associated with untreated OSA make understanding the utilization of PAP therapy imperative. The aim of this review was to describe PAP use in children and adolescents with OSA, explore factors that influence use, and describe published scientific or clinical approaches to improve use. Among 20 studies, average PAP adherence was 56.9% (range, 24-87%). PAP use averaged 4.0 h (SD = 3.1) to 5.2 h (SD = 3.4) per night. Cautious consideration of summary estimates of PAP use is necessary as studies were heterogeneous and adherence definitions widely varied across studies. Age, sex, and developmental delay were the only factors associated with PAP use in more than one study. The majority of approaches to improve use were program evaluations rather than scientifically tested interventions. This review identified critical gaps in the existing literature and sets forth a research agenda for the future.
Project description:BackgroundContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the most effective treatment for symptomatic obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The identification of actual predictors of CPAP adherence in real-world practice is essential since it enhances more individualized management for the patient. CPAP acceptance and adherence in elderly patients with OSA have the same challenges but the conclusion remains unclear. Therefore, our aim was to explore the factors influencing the adherence of CPAP in elderly OSA patients.MethodsThe retrospective observational study was conducted from OSA patients' computerized medical records at Sleep Disorders Center, Center of Medical Excellence, Chiang Mai University Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand between 2018 and 2020. Multivariable risk regression analyses were performed to evaluate the independent factors associated with CPAP non-acceptance and CPAP non-adherence.ResultsOf the 1,070 patients who underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG), 336 (31.4%) were elderly. Of 759 patients who accepted CPAP treatment, 221 (29.1%) were elderly, including 27 (12.2%) non-adherences, 139 (62.9%) adherences and 55 (24.8%) loss follow-up. Elderly patients with adverse attitudes toward CPAP use affected adherence to treatment [adjusted risk ratio (RR) =4.59, 95% CI: 1.79, 11.78, P=0.002]. Female was also associated with low CPAP adherence with adjusted RR =3.10 (95% CI: 1.07, 9.01), P=0.037.ConclusionsIn our largest cohort to date, elderly OSA patients treated with CPAP over long-term follow-ups demonstrated that adherence rates were associated with personal life issues and adverse attitudes towards treatment as well as health problems. Female was also associated with low CPAP adherence. Therefore, in the elderly with OSA, the indication and treatment of CPAP should be customized individually, and if prescribed, regular monitoring to address noncompliance and tolerance should be considered.
Project description:BackgroundStudies have shown that a significant percentage of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) do not tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and long-term use may be as low as 30%. Given the lower levels of symptoms and health-related risks, patients with mild sleep apnea may be at even higher risk for non-adherence to long term CPAP. The purpose of our study was to investigate the prevalence and associations of long-term CPAP adherence in first time users with mild sleep apnea diagnosed by home sleep apnea testing (HSAT).MethodsWe identified all the patients who were diagnosed with mild sleep apnea (5 = < AHI < 15) by home sleep apnea testing from 01/2013 to 06/2019 at a large, combined community and hospital-based sleep practice. Only first time CPAP users were included. Compliance was defined as CPAP usage ≥ 4 h per night on ≥ 70% of nights over 30 consecutive days. We defined long term adherence as compliance on the 12th month following CPAP set up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and CPAP compliance at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month after therapy initiation were collected. We compared and identified the factors that had significant difference (P < 0.1) between compliant and non-compliant groups at the 12th month.Results222 patients were included in the analysis. 57 (25.7%) patients were adherent with long term CPAP treatment. The following factors were associated with a greater likelihood for long-term CPAP adherence: older age, lower body mass index (BMI), presence of a bed partner, non-smoker, presence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), presence of Heart Failure (CHF), lack of depression, and compliance at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 9th month.ConclusionsLong term CPAP compliance in mild sleep apnea patients is low. Long term adherence to CPAP can be predicted based on CPAP adherence during the first three months.
Project description:Study objectivesContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is considered the front-line treatment for moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, nonuse rates are very high, such that adherence to CPAP has become a major concern. Although the literature on CPAP use is vast, further research is required to understand patients' experiences of CPAP use and nonuse. This is the goal of this study.MethodsThis study draws on in-depth interviews with 61 Jewish-Israeli patients with OSA who received a recommendation to use a CPAP device. The sample includes both patients who started using CPAP devices as well as patients who rejected this course of treatment. It follows principles of constructivist-grounded theory in both sampling and analysis.ResultsThe study shows that regardless of patients' status of adherence, their attitudes toward CPAP devices are characterized by ambivalence. Users of CPAP expressed ambivalent adherence, pondering whether they should stop using the device; and patients who rejected the CPAP expressed ambivalent nonadherence, wondering whether they should give the CPAP another chance. This study identifies the experiences involved in using, as well as not using, CPAP devices that produce patients' ambivalence.ConclusionsBoth adherence and nonadherence to CPAP are dynamic processes that are characterized by patients' ambivalence and contingent upon diverse factors. These findings have practical implications as they suggest that all patients, regardless of their initial adherence status, would benefit from a close follow-up.
Project description:IntroductionThe benefits of CPAP in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are not achieved without therapeutic adherence (TA). The perception of benefit is one of the main predictors of adherence. However, it is unknown whether the impact of CPAP on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is related to TA.Objective1) To evaluate whether changes in HRQoL after initiating CPAP are associated with AT. 2) To analyze the influence of various TA determinants, including baseline HRQoL.MethodsProspective observational and longitudinal study on a cohort of patients with moderate-severe OSA and indication of CPAP. Baseline and after-therapy HRQoL were evaluated using the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire (QSQ), as well as other possible AT determinants. A multivariate analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 364 patients (78% men) were included, with mean age of 55 ± 11 years and apnea-hypopnea index of 42 ± 19/hour. 33.3% without TA. There was no association between HRQoL changes after 3 months of CPAP and AT and between QSQ baseline score and AT. A higher ODI4%, a global improvement and social interactions (QSQ), were associated with AT. Baseline anxiety-depressive symptoms, worsening anxiety, and side effects with CPAP were associated with worse AT.ConclusionsThe impact of CPAP on HRQoL with respect to the perception of social interactions seems to condition TA. The basal impact of the disease, in terms of HRQoL, is not associated with AT.