Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:There is debate regarding the use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) or surgery for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This meta-analysis compared the clinical efficacy of SABR and lobectomy in stage I NSCLC patients. METHODS:An online search identified eight eligible articles (including 2 trials and 7 cohort studies) for inclusion. The odds ratio (OR) was used as a summary statistic. Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were selected to calculate ORs with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Fixed-effects or random-effects models were conducted according to study heterogeneity. RESULTS:There were no significant differences between SABR and lobectomy in terms of one-year OS or CSS. Significant benefits of surgery were observed in three-year OS (OR?2.11, 95% CI 1.55-2.86), three-year CSS (OR?1.94, 95% CI 1.05-3.57), three-year RFS (OR?1.63, 95% CI 1.12-2.36), and five-year OS (OR?2.40, 95% CI 1.71-3.36). In addition, lobectomy demonstrated a beneficial trend in one-year RFS, five-year RFS, and CSS. CONCLUSION:Meta-analyses of current evidence suggested that lobectomy provides better long-term survival outcomes for stage I NSCLC patients.

SUBMITTER: Wang S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5832478 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature