Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Water lavage as an adjunct to cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC).


ABSTRACT: Water lavage (WL) during gastrointestinal cancer surgery has osmotically mediated lytic effects on tumor cells. We investigated the safety and efficacy of WL with CRS-HIPEC.This is a retrospective review, 1/2003-7/2014, of a single institution experience with CRS-HIPEC comparing patients who had WL (WL+) to those who did not (WL-).Of 157 CRS-HIPECs, 16 (10.2%) were WL+. WL+ had more PCI scores >20 compared to WL- (56.3% vs 19.4%, respectively, p = 0.003); however, the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) was similar. There were no differences in hospital length of stay or post-operative complications. The average POD 1 sodium (Na) level was statistically lower in the WL+ group (133.6 ± 2.5 vs 135.5 ± 3.2 mEq/L, p = 0.023); however, the average Na at discharge for each group was 140 mEq/L. There were no differences in 3-year OS (3WL+:0.63 vs WL-:0.68, p = 0.97) or RFS (WL+:0.32 vs WL-:0.39, p = 0.47). A subset analysis for patients with PCI >20 showed no difference between groups.WL offers a low cost, safe and theoretically efficacious method of tumor cell lysis for peritoneal malignancy.

SUBMITTER: Gabriel E 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5833924 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Water lavage as an adjunct to cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC).

Gabriel Emmanuel E   Singla Smit S   Kim Minhyung M   Fisher Daniel D   Powers Colin C   Visioni Anthony A   Attwood Kristopher K   Skitzki Joseph J  

American journal of surgery 20170606 3


<h4>Background</h4>Water lavage (WL) during gastrointestinal cancer surgery has osmotically mediated lytic effects on tumor cells. We investigated the safety and efficacy of WL with CRS-HIPEC.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a retrospective review, 1/2003-7/2014, of a single institution experience with CRS-HIPEC comparing patients who had WL (WL+) to those who did not (WL-).<h4>Results</h4>Of 157 CRS-HIPECs, 16 (10.2%) were WL+. WL+ had more PCI scores >20 compared to WL- (56.3% vs 19.4%, respectively, p  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4716024 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6896138 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7841579 | biostudies-literature