Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Clinicopathological significance of CHFR promoter methylation in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: The mitotic checkpoint gene (CHFR) (Checkpoint with Forkhead-associated and Ring finger domains is a G2 phase/mitosis checkpoint and tumor-suppressor gene. Recent studies have reported the relationship of CHFR promoter methylation with clinicopathological significance of gastric cancer. However, the results remain unclear due to small size of sample. We pooled 15 studies including 827 gastric cancer patients and conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the clinicopathological significance of CHFR promoter methylation in gastric cancer. Our data revealed that the frequency of CHFR promoter methylation was higher in gastric cancer than in normal gastric tissue, Odd Ratio (OR) was 10.12 with 95% CI 5.17-19.79, p < 0.00001. Additionally, the rate of CHFR promoter methylation was significantly increased in high grade of gastric cancer compared to low grade, OR was 1.64 with 95% CI 1.00-2.68, p = 0.05. CHFR methylation was significantly associated with the positive lymph node metastasis, OR was 1.56 with 95% CI 1.05-2.32, p = 0.03. We concluded that CHFR could serve as a biomarker for diagnosis of gastric cancer, and a drug target for development of gene therapy in gastric cancer. CHFR promoter methylation is associated with tumor poor differentiation and lymph node metastasis.

SUBMITTER: Ding Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5839373 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Clinicopathological significance of <i>CHFR</i> promoter methylation in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Ding Yong Y   Lian Hai-Feng HF   Du Yaowu Y  

Oncotarget 20171216 11


The mitotic checkpoint gene (<i>CHFR</i>) (Checkpoint with Forkhead-associated and Ring finger domains is a G2 phase/mitosis checkpoint and tumor-suppressor gene. Recent studies have reported the relationship of <i>CHFR</i> promoter methylation with clinicopathological significance of gastric cancer. However, the results remain unclear due to small size of sample. We pooled 15 studies including 827 gastric cancer patients and conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the clinicopathological signi  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5752556 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5100908 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5725036 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7404405 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8458960 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4264770 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7396065 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5230964 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4894312 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6347251 | biostudies-literature