Dataset Information

Prospective one-year follow-up of lumbar spinal stenosis in a regional community.

ABSTRACT: Purpose:Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition in the aging population. However, limited information exists on discrepancies between LSS symptoms and imaging findings and/or prognostic factors of LSS, as well as the relationship between changes in LSS symptoms and quality of life (QoL) during the natural course of LSS. The purpose of the current study was to clarify any changes in clinically diagnosed LSS at a one-year follow-up, and identify its prognostic factors, using a community-dwelling cohort. Participants and methods:In this study, the presence of LSS, its associated comorbidities, and the status of QoL pertaining to general health and low-back pain were assessed in 1,080 community-dwelling volunteers. The same assessment was carried out a year after the initial survey. Clinically diagnosis as LSS (LSS-positive) was determined by a validated diagnostic support tool in the form of a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire. QoL was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Results:Among subjects who were LSS-positive in the initial assessment, 54% were clinically diagnosed as negative for LSS (LSS-negative) after the one-year period, whereas 10% of those who were initially diagnosed as LSS-negative changed to LSS-positive during the same period. With the improvement or deterioration of LSS-positive/negative status, low-back pain-related QoL and some components of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey similarly improved or deteriorated. Decisive prognostic factors of LSS-positive status were not determined at the one-year follow-up. Conclusion:Approximately half of the subjects who had initially been diagnosed as LSS-positive converted to LSS-negative after one year. Prognostic factors of LSS-positive diagnosis after one-year follow-up were not detected.

SUBMITTER: Otani K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5841946 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsThe aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion.MethodsThe Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study (SSSS) was conducted between 2006 and 2012 at five public and two private hospitals. Six centres participated in this two-year MRI follow-up. We randomized 222 patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two adjacent levels into two groups, decompression alone and decompression with fusion. The presence or absence of a preoperative spondylolisthesis was noted. A new stenosis on two-year MRI was used as the primary outcome, defined as a dural sac cross-sectional area ≤ 75 mm2 at the operated level (restenosis) and/or at the level above (proximal adjacent level stenosis).ResultsA total of 211 patients underwent surgery at a mean age of 66 years (69% female): 103 were treated by decompression with fusion and 108 by decompression alone. A two-year MRI was available for 176 (90%) of the eligible patients. A new stenosis at the operated and/or adjacent level occurred more frequently after decompression and fusion than after decompression alone (47% vs 29%; p = 0.020). The difference remained in the subgroup with a preoperative spondylolisthesis, (48% vs 24%; p = 0.020), but did not reach significance for those without (45% vs 35%; p = 0.488). Proximal adjacent level stenosis was more common after fusion than after decompression alone (44% vs 17%; p < 0.001). Restenosis at the operated level was less frequent after fusion than decompression alone (4% vs 14%; p = 0.036). Vertebral slip increased by 1.1 mm after decompression alone, regardless of whether a preoperative spondylolisthesis was present or not.ConclusionAdding fusion to a decompression increased the rate of new stenosis on two-year MRI, even when a spondylolisthesis was present preoperatively. This supports decompression alone as the preferred method of surgery for spinal stenosis, whether or not a degenerative spondylolisthesis is present preoperatively.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1343-1351.

Project description:BackgroundLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a clinical syndrome based on anatomic narrowing of the spinal canal. It is well known that anatomic narrowing of the spinal canal is essential for manifestation, but not all of them cause symptoms. There are many studies assessing the relationship between dural tube compression on MRI and clinical symptoms; however, most of them are cross-sectional. The purpose of this study was to reveal the magnitude of dural tube compression's influence on the presence or development of LSS symptoms at the six-year follow-up and the occurrence of surgery during the follow-up period or not in the community setting.MethodsThis was a longitudinal observational study of 459 participants who were assessed for typical LSS symptoms, and whose Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and numerical rating scale of leg pain and numbness was recorded using a questionnaire and conventional MRI of the lumbar spine. Typical LSS symptoms were judged using an LSS diagnostic support tool, which was a self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire (LSS-SSHQ). After six years, 232 subjects (follow-up rate 50.5%) were followed-up with typical LSS symptoms using LSS-SSHQ by mail. The relationship between the magnitude of dural tube compression evaluated by dural tube cross-sectional area (DCSA) in the initial assessment and the time course of typical LSS symptoms for the six-year duration were analyzed. In addition, predictors of the presence of typical LSS symptoms at the six-year follow-up were assessed. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between typical LSS symptoms and DCSA during the initial assessment of patients who underwent surgery during the follow-up period. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for statistical analysis.Results(1) Severe dural tube compression did not show that LSS symptoms continued after six years. (2) Severe dural tube compression could not detect development of LSS-symptoms and surgery during the six-year period.ConclusionSevere dural tube compression could not detect typical LSS symptom development and occurrence of surgery during the six-year period.

Project description:Background and Objectives: The high prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and its negative impact on quality of life in the elderly is well known. However, the longitudinal time course of LSS symptoms remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the longitudinal time course and associated factors of LSS symptoms over a period of six years in a community. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted with data prospectively collected in 2004 and 2010 under a retrospective design. In 2004, 1578 subjects (age range: 40 to 79 years) were interviewed on LSS symptoms using a specially designed and validated questionnaire. In 2010, a follow-up study was performed by mail, to which 789 subjects of the 2004 study population responded. Considering that the presence of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip may influence the participants' answers in the questionnaire, analysis was performed in all 789 subjects with and 513 subjects without either knee or hip OA. Changes in LSS symptoms between the initial and the 6-year survey were investigated. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used for detecting the risk factors for LSS symptom presence at the six-year follow-up. Results: 1. At the six-year follow-up, more than half of the subjects who showed LSS symptoms at the initial analysis became LSS-negative, and 12-15% of those who were LSS-negative became LSS-positive. 2. From the multiple logistic regression analysis, a lower Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) score and a positive LSS symptom at the initial analysis were detected as predictive factors of the presence of LSS symptoms at the six-year follow-up in the total number of subjects, as well as just in those who did not have either knee or hip OA. Conclusions: More than half of the subjects who were LSS-positive at their initial assessment still experienced improvement in their symptoms even after 6 years. This means that both LSS symptoms and their time course vary from person to person. Predictive factors for the presence of LSS symptoms during the six-year follow-up period were RDQ score and positive LSS symptoms.

Project description:Purpose:To develop a self-administered diagnostic screening questionnaire for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) consisting of items with high content validity and to investigate the diagnostic value of the questionnaire and the items. Patients and Methods:A self-reported diagnostic LSS screening questionnaire was developed based on items from the existing literature describing key symptoms of LSS. The screening questionnaire (index test) was to be tested in a cohort of patients with persistent lumbar and/or leg pain recruited from a Danish publicly funded outpatient secondary care spine clinic with clinicians performing the reference test. However, to avoid unnecessary collection of data if the screening questionnaire proved to be of limited value, a case-control design was incorporated into the cohort design including an interim analysis. Additional cases for the case-control study were recruited at two Danish publicly funded spine surgery departments. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each individual item, and AUC (area under the curve) was calculated to examine the performance of the full questionnaire. Results:A 13-item Danish questionnaire was developed and tested in 153 cases and 230 controls. The interim analysis was not in favour of continuing the cohort study, and therefore, only results from the case-control study are reported. There was a positive association for all items except the presence of back pain. However, the association was only moderate with ORs up to 3.3. When testing the performance of the whole questionnaire, an AUC of 0.72 was reached with a specificity of 20% for a fixed sensitivity of 95%. Conclusion:The items were associated with LSS and therefore have some potential to identify LSS patients. However, the association was not strong enough to provide sufficient accuracy for a diagnostic tool. Additional dimensions of symptoms of LSS need identification to obtain a reliable questionnaire for screening purposes.

Dataset Information

Prospective one-year follow-up of lumbar spinal stenosis in a regional community.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets