Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A meta-analysis of birth-origin effects on reproduction in diverse captive environments.


ABSTRACT: Successfully establishing captive breeding programs is a priority across diverse industries to address food security, demand for ethical laboratory research animals, and prevent extinction. Differences in reproductive success due to birth origin may threaten the long-term sustainability of captive breeding. Our meta-analysis examining 115 effect sizes from 44 species of invertebrates, fish, birds, and mammals shows that, overall, captive-born animals have a 42% decreased odds of reproductive success in captivity compared to their wild-born counterparts. The largest effects are seen in commercial aquaculture, relative to conservation or laboratory settings, and offspring survival and offspring quality were the most sensitive traits. Although a somewhat weaker trend, reproductive success in conservation and laboratory research breeding programs is also in a negative direction for captive-born animals. Our study provides the foundation for future investigation of non-genetic and genetic drivers of change in captivity, and reveals areas for the urgent improvement of captive breeding.

SUBMITTER: Farquharson KA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5849764 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A meta-analysis of birth-origin effects on reproduction in diverse captive environments.

Farquharson Katherine A KA   Hogg Carolyn J CJ   Grueber Catherine E CE  

Nature communications 20180313 1


Successfully establishing captive breeding programs is a priority across diverse industries to address food security, demand for ethical laboratory research animals, and prevent extinction. Differences in reproductive success due to birth origin may threaten the long-term sustainability of captive breeding. Our meta-analysis examining 115 effect sizes from 44 species of invertebrates, fish, birds, and mammals shows that, overall, captive-born animals have a 42% decreased odds of reproductive suc  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5508737 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2408661 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9958737 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7825229 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7941775 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8610968 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5007670 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7671150 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3017793 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3701588 | biostudies-literature