Unknown

Dataset Information

0

SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:To assess the effect on needed nursing time for dressing change. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS:A parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients who are in need for a peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in one teaching hospital in Belgium. The follow-up lasted 180 days or until catheter removal, whatever came first. A computer generated table was used to allocate devices. Randomised patients were 105 adults (StatLock, n=53; SecurAcath, n=52) and primary analysis was based on all patients (n=92) with time measurements (StatLock, n=43; SecurAcath, n=49). INTERVENTIONS:StatLock which has to be changed weekly versus SecurAcath which could remain in place for the complete catheter dwell time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:Needed time for the dressing change at each dressing change (SecurAcath) or at each dressing change combined with the change of the securement device (StatLock). RESULTS:Median time needed for dressing change was 7.3?min (95%?CI 6.4?min to 8.3?min) in the StatLock group and in the SecurAcath group 4.3?min (95%?CI 3.8 min to 4.9?min) (P<0.0001). The time in the SecurAcath group was reduced with 41% (95% CI 29% to 51%). Incidence rates of migration, dislodgement and catheter-related bloodstream infection were comparable across groups. Pain scores were higher with SecurAcath than with StatLock at insertion (P=0.02) and at removal (P<0.001) and comparable during dressing change (P=0.38) and during dwell time (P=0.995). User-friendliness was scored at insertion and removal. All statements regarding the user-friendliness were scored significantly higher for StatLock than for SecurAcath (P<0.05). Only for the statement regarding the recommending routine use of the device, which was asked at removal, no difference was found between the two devices (P=0.32). CONCLUSION:Use of SecurAcath saves time during dressing change compared with StatLock. Training on correct placement and removal of SecurAcath is critical to minimise pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT02311127; Pre-results.

SUBMITTER: Goossens GA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5855473 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial.

Goossens Godelieve Alice GA   Grumiaux Niel N   Janssens Christel C   Jérôme Martine M   Fieuws Steffen S   Moons Philip P   Stas Marguerite M   Maleux Geert G  

BMJ open 20180224 2


<h4>Objectives</h4>To assess the effect on needed nursing time for dressing change.<h4>Design, setting, participants</h4>A parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients who are in need for a peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in one teaching hospital in Belgium. The follow-up lasted 180 days or until catheter removal, whatever came first. A computer generated table was used to allocate devices. Randomised patients were 105 adults (StatLock, n=53; SecurAcath, n  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4974875 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5010186 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6244619 | biostudies-literature