Dataset Information

Chertsey Outcome Score for Trauma: Development and validation of a new unifying patient reported outcome measure for orthopaedic trauma.

ABSTRACT: Lately there is an increasing tendency of using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) as a final indicator of the outcome of many surgical treatments in orthopaedics and in other medical specialties. Currently there are many outcome scores in orthopaedics and most of them are site specific. In the contrary there is a lack of trauma specific outcome scores.We have designed a new PROM especially for orthopaedic trauma patients, in order to measure in what extent the patients manage to return to their pre-injury state. This score uses as baseline the pre-injury status of the patient and has the aim to determine the percentage of rehabilitation after treatment for any injury.A total of 60 Chertsey Outcome Score for Trauma (COST) questionnaires were gathered in our outpatients department. The participants were 57% male (aged 46.81 years ± 18.5 years) and the questionnaires collected at mean 10 months post-injury. A Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.89 was identified for the whole construct. The three dimensions of the scale had good internal consistency as well (Cronbach's Alpha test values 0.74, 0.84 and 0.81 for symptoms, function and mental status respectively). Strong/moderate correlation (Spearman's Rho test 0.43-0.65) was observed between the respective physical/mental dimensions of the COST and SF-12v2 questionnaires.There is a need among the orthopaedic trauma society for a specific PROM of trauma. COST is a useful and easy to use tool for every trauma surgeon.

SUBMITTER: Iliopoulos E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5855518 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Chertsey Outcome Score for Trauma: Development and validation of a new unifying patient reported outcome measure for orthopaedic trauma.

Iliopoulos Efthymios E Agarwal Sujit S Khaleel Arshad A

Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi 20171104 6

<h4>Purpose</h4>Lately there is an increasing tendency of using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) as a final indicator of the outcome of many surgical treatments in orthopaedics and in other medical specialties. Currently there are many outcome scores in orthopaedics and most of them are site specific. In the contrary there is a lack of trauma specific outcome scores.<h4>Methods</h4>We have designed a new PROM especially for orthopaedic trauma patients, in order to measure in what extent ...[more]

PMID: 29198714

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPatient-reported outcome (PRO) measures developed and validated on patients with the currently defined phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are needed to support clinical trials in CRS.ObjectiveThis study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of the CRS-PRO, a new PRO measure of CRS.MethodsInstrument development was performed through structured interviews and focus groups with clinical experts and 45 patients with CRS meeting current definitions of disease, 21 patients with CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and 24 patients with CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) to identify items important to patients. Then another 50 patients (32 with CRSsNP and 18 with CRSwNP) with stable CRS symptoms were enrolled to evaluate the reliability of the instrument. Each patient completed the CRS-PRO, Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), and 4 Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System short forms at the baseline visit and then at least 7 days later.ResultsAfter the development process, 21 items were identified from the conceptual domains of physical symptoms, sensory impairment, psychosocial effects, and life impact. Using the responses of the 50 patients with CRS, 21 draft items were further refined to 12 items by eliminating conceptually similar or highly correlated items or those with low mean symptom severity. The 12-item questionnaire was shown to have excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α, 0.86) and test-retest reliability with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.89) and Pearson's correlation (r = 0.82, P < .0001). The 12-item CRS-PRO correlated highly with the longer SNOT-22 (r = 0.83, P < .0001) demonstrating its concurrent validity. We also demonstrated validity and reliability in a separate analysis for patients with CRSsNP and CRSwNP.ConclusionThe CRS-PRO is a concise, valid, and reliable measure that was developed with extensive input from patients with CRS with current disease definitions.

Project description:BackgroundDue to a lack of an appropriate disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for chronic heart failure including its social support and treatment aspects in China, this study was performed to develop a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with chronic heart failure and evaluate its reliability, validity, and feasibility.MethodsAccording to the standard PROM guidelines established by the Food and Drug Administration, an item pool was formed by reviewing a large amount of relevant literature and interviewing patients with chronic heart failure about their main symptoms. Thus, the primary scale was created after adjusting the items and language with the help of patients and experts in the field. Next, 155 patients from 8 hospitals in different districts were recruited for a pilot survey using questionnaires containing these items. The patients' responses were analyzed using the classical test theory and item response theory to select high-quality items and determine the subdomains of the scale. This was followed by a formal investigation in the same eight hospitals. In total, 360 patients and 100 healthy subjects were included to evaluate the reliability, validity, and feasibility of the items. Through this process, the final scale was established.ResultsThe final scale comprised 12 subdomains with 57 items related to physical, psychological, social, and therapeutic areas. The data analysis results of the formal investigation showed that the PROM for chronic heart failure had good reliability, validity, and feasibility. Reliability was verified by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which was 0.913 for the total scale, 0.903 for the physical domain, 0.941 for the psychological domain, 0.827 for the social domain, and 0.839 for the therapeutic domain. The construct validity results met the relative criteria of confirmatory factor analysis. Discriminant validity was represented by score comparisons of nine subdomains. The response rate and the effective rate of return of the CHF-PROM were 98.94% and 98.92%, respectively.ConclusionsThe final scale coincides with the theoretical framework and better reflects the overall quality of life of patients with chronic heart failure. This scale can be used as a valid instrument to evaluate clinical treatment and clinical trials of chronic heart failure.

Project description:ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate a tailored patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) evaluating the patient experience of recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) symptom severity. This measure was designed to supplement clinical testing methods, allowing full assessment of the patient experience of rUTI symptom burden, while enhancing patient-centred UTI management and monitoring.Subjects and methodsThe Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Symptom Scale (RUTISS) was developed and validated using a three-stage methodology, in accordance with gold-standard recommendations. Firstly, a two-round Delphi study was conducted to gain insights from 15 international expert clinicians working in rUTI, developing an initial pool of novel questionnaire items, assessing content validity and making item refinements. Next, two phases of one-to-one semi-structured cognitive interviews were conducted with a diverse sample of 28 people experiencing rUTI to assess questionnaire comprehensiveness and comprehensibility, making refinements after each phase. Finally, a comprehensive pilot of the RUTISS was conducted with 240 people experiencing rUTI across 24 countries, providing data for psychometric testing and item reduction.ResultsExploratory factor analysis indicated a four-factor structure comprising: 'urinary pain and discomfort', 'urinary urgency', 'bodily sensations' and 'urinary presentation', together accounting for 75.4% of the total variance in data. Qualitative feedback from expert clinicians and patients indicated strong content validity for items, which was supported by high content validity indices in the Delphi study (I-CVI > 0.75). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the RUTISS subscales were excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.87-0.94 and ICC = 0.73-0.82, respectively), and construct validity was strong (Spearman's ρ = 0.60-0.82).ConclusionThe RUTISS is a 28-item questionnaire with excellent reliability and validity, which dynamically assesses patient-reported rUTI symptoms and pain. This new PROM offers a unique opportunity to critically inform and strategically enhance the quality of rUTI management, patient-clinician interactions, and shared-decision making by monitoring key patient-reported outcomes.

Dataset Information

Chertsey Outcome Score for Trauma: Development and validation of a new unifying patient reported outcome measure for orthopaedic trauma.

Publications

Chertsey Outcome Score for Trauma: Development and validation of a new unifying patient reported outcome measure for orthopaedic trauma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets