Dataset Information

Memory Binding Test Distinguishes Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia from Cognitively Normal Elderly.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

We aimed to assess reliability and cross-sectional discriminative validity of the Memory Binding Test (MBT) to distinguish persons with amnestic cognitive impairment (aMCI) and dementia from cognitively normal elderly controls.

Method

The MBT was administered to 20 participants with dementia, 31 with aMCI and 246 controls, who received the first administration of the MBT from May 2003 to December 2007, as a substudy of the community-based Einstein Aging Study (age range: 70+). The optimal index resulted from comparing the partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC AUC) of four major MBT indices for specificities ?0.70. Optimal cut-score of the optimal index was selected by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity. Age and education effects were assessed using stratified cut-scores and adjusted logistic regression. Reliability was computed as intraclass correlation between scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up for participants who remained cognitively normal.

Results

Total number of Items recalled in the Paired condition (TIP) was elected the optimal index. TIP cut-score was ?22 for differentiating aMCI alone (sensitivity = 0.74, specificity = 0.73) and aMCI and dementia combined (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.73) from controls. It was ?17 for differentiating dementia from aMCI and controls (sensitivity = 0.95, specificity = 0.87). Age and education adjustments did not materially improve discriminative validity. The reliability of TIP was 0.77.

Conclusions

MBT achieved moderate to good reliability. TIP had superior cross-sectional discriminative validity than the other MBT indices. We recommend using the empirical cut-score of TIP ?22 for discriminating aMCI and dementia and ?17 for discriminating dementia alone.

SUBMITTER: Buschke H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5860053 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Memory Binding Test Distinguishes Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia from Cognitively Normal Elderly.

Buschke Herman H Mowrey Wenzhu B WB Ramratan Wendy S WS Zimmerman Molly E ME Loewenstein David A DA Katz Mindy J MJ Lipton Richard B RB

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists 20160927 1

<h4>Objective</h4>We aimed to assess reliability and cross-sectional discriminative validity of the Memory Binding Test (MBT) to distinguish persons with amnestic cognitive impairment (aMCI) and dementia from cognitively normal elderly controls.<h4>Method</h4>The MBT was administered to 20 participants with dementia, 31 with aMCI and 246 controls, who received the first administration of the MBT from May 2003 to December 2007, as a substudy of the community-based Einstein Aging Study (age range: ...[more]

PMID: 27680087

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionLipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) is a circulating enzyme with pro-inflammatory and oxidative activities associated with cardiovascular disease and ischemic stroke. While high plasma Lp-PLA2 activity was reported as a risk factor for dementia in the Rotterdam study, no association between Lp-PLA2 mass and dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD) was detected in the Framingham study. The objectives of the current study were to explore the relationship of plasma Lp-PLA2 activity with cognitive diagnoses (AD, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and cognitively healthy subjects), cardiovascular markers, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of AD, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype.MethodsSubjects with mild AD (n = 78) and aMCI (n = 59) were recruited from the Memory Clinic, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland; cognitively healthy subjects (n = 66) were recruited from the community. Subjects underwent standardised medical, neurological, neuropsychological, imaging, genetic, blood and CSF evaluation. Differences in Lp-PLA2 activity between the cognitive diagnosis groups were tested with ANOVA and in multiple linear regression models with adjustment for covariates. Associations between Lp-PLA2 and markers of cardiovascular disease and AD were explored with Spearman's correlation coefficients.ResultsThere was no significant difference in plasma Lp-PLA2 activity between AD (197.1 (standard deviation, SD 38.4) nmol/min/ml) and controls (195.4 (SD 41.9)). Gender, statin use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) were independently associated with Lp-PLA2 activity in multiple regression models. Lp-PLA2 activity was correlated with LDL and inversely correlated with high-density lipoprotein (HDL). AD subjects with APOE-ε4 had higher Lp-PLA2 activity (207.9 (SD 41.2)) than AD subjects lacking APOE-ε4 (181.6 (SD 26.0), P = 0.003) although this was attenuated by adjustment for LDL (P = 0.09). No strong correlations were detected for Lp-PLA2 activity and CSF markers of AD.ConclusionPlasma Lp-PLA2 was not associated with a diagnosis of AD or aMCI in this cross-sectional study. The main clinical correlates of Lp-PLA2 activity in AD, aMCI and cognitively healthy subjects were variables associated with lipid metabolism.

Project description:ObjectivesThis study aimed to primarily examine the association between memory deficit and increased fall risk, second, explore the underlying neuroanatomical linkage of this association in the elderly with aMCI and mild AD.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, a total of 103 older adults were included (55 cognitively normal, CN; 48 cognitive impairment, CI, elderly with aMCI, and mild AD). Memory was assessed by the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT). Fall risk was evaluated by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test, heel strike angles, and stride speed, which were collected by an inertial-sensor-based wearable instrument (the JiBuEn™ gait analysis system). Brain volumes were full-automatic segmented and quantified using AccuBrain® v1.2 from three-dimensional T1-weighted (3D T1W) MR images. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine the extent of the association between memory deficit and fall risk, the association of brain volumes with memory, and fall risk. Age, sex, education, BMI, and HAMD scores were adjusted. Sensitivity analysis was conducted.ResultsCompared to CN, participants with aMCI and mild AD had poorer cognitive performance (p < 0.001), longer TUG time (p = 0.018), and smaller hippocampus and medial temporal volumes (p = 0.037 and 0.029). In the CI group, compared to good short delayed memory (SDM) performance (AVLT > 5), the elderly with bad SDM performance (AVLT ≤ 3) had longer TUG time, smaller heel strike angles, and slower stride speed. Multivariable regression analysis showed that elderly with poor memory had higher fall risk than relative good memory performance among cognitive impairment elderly. The TUG time increased by 2.1 s, 95% CI, 0.54∼3.67; left heel strike angle reduced by 3.22°, 95% CI, -6.05 to -0.39; and stride speed reduced by 0.09 m/s, 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.00 for the poor memory elderly among the CI group, but not found the association in CN group. In addition, serious medial temporal atrophy (MTA), small volumes of the frontal lobe and occipital lobe were associated with long TUG time and small heel strike angles; small volumes of the temporal lobe, frontal lobe, and parietal lobe were associated with slow stride speed.ConclusionOur findings suggested that memory deficit was associated with increased fall risk in the elderly with aMCI and mild AD. The association might be mediated by the atrophy of medial temporal, frontal, and parietal lobes. Additionally, increased fall risk, tested by TUG time, heel stride angles, and stride speed, might be objective and convenient kinematics markers for dynamic monitoring of both memory function and fall risk.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Determination of β-amyloid (Aβ) positivity and likelihood of underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD) relies on dichotomous biomarker cut-off values. Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Aβ within the normal range may still have a substantial risk of developing dementia, primarily of Alzheimer type. Their prognosis, as well as predictors of clinical progression, are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to explore the associations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (Aβ42, total tau, phosphorylated tau) and other characteristics, including modifiable vascular factors, with the risk of progression to dementia among patients with MCI and normal CSF Aβ42. METHODS:Three hundred eighteen memory clinic patients with CSF and clinical data, and at least 1-year follow-up, were included. Patients had normal CSF Aβ42 levels based on clinical cut-offs. Cox proportional hazard models with age as time scale and adjusted for sex, education, and cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination) were used to investigate predictors of progression to dementia and Alzheimer-type dementia. Potential predictors included CSF biomarkers, cognitive performance (verbal learning and memory), apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 genotype, medial temporal lobe atrophy, family history of dementia, depressive symptoms, and vascular factors, including the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) risk score. Predictive performance of patient characteristics was further explored with Harrell C statistic. RESULTS:Lower normal Aβ42 and higher total tau and phosphorylated tau were associated with higher dementia risk, and the association was not driven by Aβ42 values close to cut-off. Additional predictors included poorer cognition, APOE ε4 genotype, higher systolic blood pressure, and lower body mass index, but not the CAIDE dementia risk score. Aβ42 individually and in combination with other CSF biomarkers improved the risk prediction compared to age and cognition alone. Medial temporal lobe atrophy or vascular factors did not increase the predictive performance. CONCLUSIONS:Possibility of underlying AD pathology and increased dementia risk should not be ruled out among MCI patients with CSF Aβ42 within the normal range. While cut-offs may be useful in clinical practice to identify high-risk individuals, personalized risk prediction tools incorporating continuous biomarkers may be preferable among individuals with intermediate risk. The role of modifiable vascular factors could be explored in this context.

Dataset Information

Memory Binding Test Distinguishes Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia from Cognitively Normal Elderly.

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Memory Binding Test Distinguishes Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia from Cognitively Normal Elderly.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets