Dataset Information

Diffloop: a computational framework for identifying and analyzing differential DNA loops from sequencing data.

ABSTRACT: Summary:The 3D architecture of DNA within the nucleus is a key determinant of interactions between genes, regulatory elements, and transcriptional machinery. As a result, differences in DNA looping structure are associated with variation in gene expression and cell state. To systematically assess changes in DNA looping architecture between samples, we introduce diffloop, an R/Bioconductor package that provides a suite of functions for the quality control, statistical testing, annotation, and visualization of DNA loops. We demonstrate this functionality by detecting differences between ENCODE ChIA-PET samples and relate looping to variability in epigenetic state. Availability and implementation:Diffloop is implemented as an R/Bioconductor package available at https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/diffloop.html. Contact:aryee.martin@mgh.harvard.edu. Supplementary information:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

SUBMITTER: Lareau CA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5860605 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

diffloop: a computational framework for identifying and analyzing differential DNA loops from sequencing data.

Lareau Caleb A CA Aryee Martin J MJ

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20180201 4

<h4>Summary</h4>The 3D architecture of DNA within the nucleus is a key determinant of interactions between genes, regulatory elements, and transcriptional machinery. As a result, differences in DNA looping structure are associated with variation in gene expression and cell state. To systematically assess changes in DNA looping architecture between samples, we introduce diffloop, an R/Bioconductor package that provides a suite of functions for the quality control, statistical testing, annotation, ...[more]

PMID: 29028898

Similar Datasets

Project description:Stochastic fluctuations in gene expression give rise to distributions of protein levels across cell populations. Despite a mounting number of theoretical models explaining stochasticity in protein expression, we lack a robust, efficient, assumption-free approach for inferring the molecular mechanisms that underlie the shape of protein distributions. Here we propose a method for inferring sets of biochemical rate constants that govern chromatin modification, transcription, translation, and RNA and protein degradation from stochasticity in protein expression. We asked whether the rates of these underlying processes can be estimated accurately from protein expression distributions, in the absence of any limiting assumptions. To do this, we (1) derived analytical solutions for the first four moments of the protein distribution, (2) found that these four moments completely capture the shape of protein distributions, and (3) developed an efficient algorithm for inferring gene expression rate constants from the moments of protein distributions. Using this algorithm we find that most protein distributions are consistent with a large number of different biochemical rate constant sets. Despite this degeneracy, the solution space of rate constants almost always informs on underlying mechanism. For example, we distinguish between regimes where transcriptional bursting occurs from regimes reflecting constitutive transcript production. Our method agrees with the current standard approach, and in the restrictive regime where the standard method operates, also identifies rate constants not previously obtainable. Even without making any assumptions we obtain estimates of individual biochemical rate constants, or meaningful ratios of rate constants, in 91% of tested cases. In some cases our method identified all of the underlying rate constants. The framework developed here will be a powerful tool for deducing the contributions of particular molecular mechanisms to specific patterns of gene expression.

Project description:BackgroundPan-genomics is a recently emerging strategy that can be utilized to provide a more comprehensive characterization of genetic variation. Joint calling is routinely used to combine identified variants across multiple related samples. However, the improvement of variants identification using the mutual support information from multiple samples remains quite limited for population-scale genotyping.ResultsIn this study, we developed a computational framework for joint calling genetic variants from 5,061 sheep by incorporating the sequencing error and optimizing mutual support information from multiple samples' data. The variants were accurately identified from multiple samples by using four steps: (1) Probabilities of variants from two widely used algorithms, GATK and Freebayes, were calculated by Poisson model incorporating base sequencing error potential; (2) The variants with high mapping quality or consistently identified from at least two samples by GATK and Freebayes were used to construct the raw high-confidence identification (rHID) variants database; (3) The high confidence variants identified in single sample were ordered by probability value and controlled by false discovery rate (FDR) using rHID database; (4) To avoid the elimination of potentially true variants from rHID database, the variants that failed FDR were reexamined to rescued potential true variants and ensured high accurate identification variants. The results indicated that the percent of concordant SNPs and Indels from Freebayes and GATK after our new method were significantly improved 12%-32% compared with raw variants and advantageously found low frequency variants of individual sheep involved several traits including nipples number (GPC5), scrapie pathology (PAPSS2), seasonal reproduction and litter size (GRM1), coat color (RAB27A), and lentivirus susceptibility (TMEM154).ConclusionThe new method used the computational strategy to reduce the number of false positives, and simultaneously improve the identification of genetic variants. This strategy did not incur any extra cost by using any additional samples or sequencing data information and advantageously identified rare variants which can be important for practical applications of animal breeding.

Dataset Information

Diffloop: a computational framework for identifying and analyzing differential DNA loops from sequencing data.

Publications

diffloop: a computational framework for identifying and analyzing differential DNA loops from sequencing data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets