Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Comparison of methods to detect differentially expressed genes between single-cell populations.

ABSTRACT: We compared five statistical methods to detect differentially expressed genes between two distinct single-cell populations. Currently, it remains unclear whether differential expression methods developed originally for conventional bulk RNA-seq data can also be applied to single-cell RNA-seq data analysis. Our results in three diverse comparison settings showed marked differences between the different methods in terms of the number of detections as well as their sensitivity and specificity. They, however, did not reveal systematic benefits of the currently available single-cell-specific methods. Instead, our previously introduced reproducibility-optimization method showed good performance in all comparison settings without any single-cell-specific modifications.

SUBMITTER: Jaakkola MK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5862313 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Comparison of methods to detect differentially expressed genes between single-cell populations.

Jaakkola Maria K MK Seyednasrollah Fatemeh F Mehmood Arfa A Elo Laura L LL

Briefings in bioinformatics 20170901 5

We compared five statistical methods to detect differentially expressed genes between two distinct single-cell populations. Currently, it remains unclear whether differential expression methods developed originally for conventional bulk RNA-seq data can also be applied to single-cell RNA-seq data analysis. Our results in three diverse comparison settings showed marked differences between the different methods in terms of the number of detections as well as their sensitivity and specificity. They ...[more]

PMID: 27373736

Similar Datasets

Reproducibility of Methods to Detect Differentially Expressed Genes from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.

Project description:Detection of differentially expressed genes is a common task in single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) studies. Various methods based on both bulk-cell and single-cell approaches are in current use. Due to the unique distributional characteristics of single-cell data, it is important to compare these methods with rigorous statistical assessments. In this study, we assess the reproducibility of 9 tools for differential expression analysis in scRNA-seq data. These tools include four methods originally designed for scRNA-seq data, three popular methods originally developed for bulk-cell RNA-seq data but have been applied in scRNA-seq analysis, and two general statistical tests. Instead of comparing the performance across all genes, we compare the methods in terms of the rediscovery rates (RDRs) of top-ranked genes, separately for highly and lowly expressed genes. Three real and one simulated scRNA-seq data sets are used for the comparisons. The results indicate that some widely used methods, such as edgeR and monocle, have worse RDR performances compared to the other methods, especially for the top-ranked genes. For highly expressed genes, many bulk-cell-based methods can perform similarly to the methods designed for scRNA-seq data. But for the lowly expressed genes performance varies substantially; edgeR and monocle are too liberal and have poor control of false positives, while DESeq2 is too conservative and consequently loses sensitivity compared to the other methods. BPSC, Limma, DEsingle, MAST, t-test and Wilcoxon have similar performances in the real data sets. Overall, the scRNA-seq based method BPSC performs well against the other methods, particularly when there is a sufficient number of cells.

| S-EPMC6979262 | biostudies-literature

Proportion statistics to detect differentially expressed genes: a comparison with log-ratio statistics.

Project description:BackgroundIn genetic transcription research, gene expression is typically reported in a test sample relative to a reference sample. Laboratory assays that measure gene expression levels, from Q-RT-PCR to microarrays to RNA-Seq experiments, will compare two samples to the same genetic sequence of interest. Standard practice is to use the log(2)-ratio as the measure of relative expression. There are drawbacks to using this measurement, including unstable ratios when the denominator is small. This paper suggests an alternative estimate based on a proportion that is just as simple to calculate, just as intuitive, with the added benefit of greater numerical stability.ResultsAnalysis of two groups of mice measured with 16 cDNA microarrays found similar results between the previously used methods and our proposed methods. In a study of liver and kidney samples measured with RNA-Seq, we found that proportion statistics could detect additional differentially expressed genes usually classified as missing by ratio statistics. Additionally, simulations demonstrated that one of our proposed proportion-based test statistics was robust to deviations from distributional assumptions where all other methods examined were not.ConclusionsTo measure relative expression between two samples, the proportion estimates that we propose yield equivalent results to the log(2)-ratio under most circumstances and better results than the log(2)-ratio when expression values are close to zero.

| S-EPMC3224106 | biostudies-literature

Differentially expressed genes between osteochondroprogenitor sub-populations

Project description:Cell based bone regeneration strategies offer promise for traumatic bone injuries, congenital defects, non-union fractures and other skeletal pathologies. Postnatal bone remodeling and fracture healing provide evidence that an osteochondroprogenitor cell is present in adult life which can differentiate to remodel or repair the fractured bone. However, cell based skeletal repair in the clinic is still in its infancy mostly due to poor characterization of progenitor cells and lack of knowledge about their in vivo behavior. Here we took a combined approach of high throughput screening, flow based cell sorting and in vivo transplantation to identify markers that identify osteochondroprogenitor cells. We show that the presence of tetraspanin CD9 enriches for osteochondroprogenitors within CD105+vemesenchymal cells and these cells readily form bone upon transplantation. In addition we have used Thy1.2 (CD90) and the ectonucleotidase CD73 to identify subsets within the CD9+ve population that lead to endochondral or intramembranous-like bone formation. Utilization of this unique cell surface phenotype to enrich for osteochondroprogenitor cells will allow for further characterization of the molecular mechanisms that regulate their osteogenic properties.

2014-12-22 | GSE64406 | GEO

Differentially expressed genes between osteochondroprogenitor sub-populations

2014-12-22 | E-GEOD-64406 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Statistical methods for ranking differentially expressed genes.

Project description:In the analysis of microarray data the identification of differential expression is paramount. Here I outline a method for finding an optimal test statistic with which to rank genes with respect to differential expression. Tests of the method show that it allows generation of top gene lists that give few false positives and few false negatives. Estimation of the false-negative as well as the false-positive rate lies at the heart of the method.

| S-EPMC193620 | biostudies-literature

Empirical evaluation of consistency and accuracy of methods to detect differentially expressed genes based on microarray data.

Project description:In this study, we empirically evaluated the consistency and accuracy of five different methods to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on microarray data.Five different methods were compared, including the t-test, significance analysis of microarrays (SAM), the empirical Bayes t-test (eBayes), t-tests relative to a threshold (TREAT), and assumption adequacy averaging (AAA). The percentage of overlapping genes (POG) and the percentage of overlapping genes related (POGR) scores were used to rank the different methods on their ability to maintain a consistent list of DEGs both within the same data set and across two different data sets concerning the same disease. The power of each method was evaluated based on a simulation approach which mimics the multivariate distribution of the original microarray data.For smaller sample sizes (6 or less per group), moderated versions of the t-test (SAM, eBayes, and TREAT) were superior in terms of both power and consistency relative to the t-test and AAA, with TREAT having the highest consistency in each scenario. Differences in consistency were most pronounced for comparisons between two different data sets for the same disease. For larger sample sizes AAA had the highest power for detecting small effect sizes, while TREAT had the lowest.For smaller sample sizes moderated versions of the t-test can generally be recommended, while for larger sample sizes selection of a method to detect DEGs may involve a compromise between consistency and power.

| S-EPMC3993975 | biostudies-literature

Comparison of methods for identifying differentially expressed genes across multiple conditions from microarray data.

Project description:Identification of genes differentially expressed across multiple conditions has become an important statistical problem in analyzing large-scale microarray data. Many statistical methods have been developed to address the challenging problem. Therefore, an extensive comparison among these statistical methods is extremely important for experimental scientists to choose a valid method for their data analysis. In this study, we conducted simulation studies to compare six statistical methods: the Bonferroni (B-) procedure, the Benjamini and Hochberg (BH-) procedure, the Local false discovery rate (Localfdr) method, the Optimal Discovery Procedure (ODP), the Ranking Analysis of F-statistics (RAF), and the Significant Analysis of Microarray data (SAM) in identifying differentially expressed genes. We demonstrated that the strength of treatment effect, the sample size, proportion of differentially expressed genes and variance of gene expression will significantly affect the performance of different methods. The simulated results show that ODP exhibits an extremely high power in indentifying differentially expressed genes, but significantly underestimates the False Discovery Rate (FDR) in all different data scenarios. The SAM has poor performance when the sample size is small, but is among the best-performing methods when the sample size is large. The B-procedure is stringent and thus has a low power in all data scenarios. Localfdr and RAF show comparable statistical behaviors with the BH-procedure with favorable power and conservativeness of FDR estimation. RAF performs the best when proportion of differentially expressed genes is small and treatment effect is weak, but Localfdr is better than RAF when proportion of differentially expressed genes is large.

| S-EPMC3280440 | biostudies-literature

Adaptive thresholds to detect differentially expressed genes in microarray data.

Project description:To detect changes in gene expression data from microarrays, a fixed threshold for fold difference is used widely. However, it is not always guaranteed that a threshold value which is appropriate for highly expressed genes is suitable for lowly expressed genes. In this study, aiming at detecting truly differentially expressed genes from a wide expression range, we proposed an adaptive threshold method (AT). The adaptive thresholds, which have different values for different expression levels, are calculated based on two measurements under the same condition. The sensitivity, specificity and false discovery rate (FDR) of AT were investigated by simulations. The sensitivity and specificity under various noise conditions were greater than 89.7% and 99.32%, respectively. The FDR was smaller than 0.27. These results demonstrated the reliability of the method.

| S-EPMC3163930 | biostudies-literature

Identification of differentially-expressed genes between early-stage adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma lung cancer using meta-analysis methods.

Project description:Lung adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell lung carcinoma (SCC) are two major subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous studies have demonstrated that fundamental differences exist in the underlying mechanisms of tumor development, growth and invasion between these subtypes. The investigation of differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) between these two NSCLC subtypes is useful for determining and understanding such differences. The present study aimed to identify those DEGs using meta-analysis and the data from four microarray experiments, consisting of 164 AC and 161 SCC samples. Raw gene expression values were converted into the probability of expression (POE) representing the differentially-expressed probability of a gene and expression barcode values representing its expression status. The results indicated that when applying a meta-analysis using barcode values, heterogeneity in genes across studies was less severe than when applying a meta-analysis using POE values. DEGs in each meta-analysis method overlapped substantially (P=1.3×10-4), but the barcode method yielded a lower global false discovery rate. Based on this and several other performance statistics, it was concluded that the barcode approach outperformed the POE method. Finally, using those DEGs, ontology and pathway analyses were conducted. A number of genes and enriched pathways were found to be closely associated with NSCLC.

| S-EPMC5431262 | biostudies-literature

Exploring the evolutionary history of the differentially expressed genes between human populations: action of recent positive selection.

Project description:Though debates exist on the early human evolutionary models such as the "Out of Africa" theory, which hypothesizes that modern humans migrated from Africa to Europe about 50,000 to 100,000 years ago, Africans and Europeans were geographically separated with minimal gene flow for tens of thousands of years. The variations between the current European and African populations, therefore, should have evolved during this timeframe. To gain more insights into the evolutionary history of human phenotypes including gene expression, it is critical to tell how recent positive selection has played a role in the variations observed in the current populations. Using the list of differentially expressed genes we previously identified between the HapMap samples derived from individuals of African (from Ibadan, Nigeria) and European (from Utah, USA) ancestry, we searched for evidence of selection among these differential genes. We found that 27 differentially expressed genes (out of 356 tested) between these two European and African populations have been under recent positive selection. Our findings suggest that the variation between these two populations appears to be affected primarily by neutral genetic drift and/or stabilizing selection and to a lesser degree by positive selection. Further annotation enrichment analyses showed that these 27 genes under selection were overrepresented in certain Gene Ontology biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components such as transcription, lipid binding and lysosome. Our results can provide unique insights into the evolutionary history of the variation in the gene expression phenotype between these two human populations.

| S-EPMC2585739 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data