Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Detecting Sepsis: Are Two Opinions Better Than One?


ABSTRACT: The diagnosis of sepsis requires that objective criteria be met with a corresponding subjective suspicion of infection. We conducted a study to characterize the agreement between different providers' suspicion of infection and the correlation with patient outcomes using prospective data from a general medicine ward. Registered nurse (RN) suspicion of infection was collected every 12 hours and compared with medical doctor or advanced practice professional (MD/APP) suspicion, defined as an existing order for antibiotics or a new order for blood or urine cultures within the 12 hours before nursing screen time. During the study period, 1386 patients yielded 11,489 screens, 3744 (32.6%) of which met at least 2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Infection was suspected by RN and MD/APP in 5.8% of cases, by RN only in 22.2%, by MD/APP only in 7.2%, and by neither provider in 64.7%. Overall agreement rate was 80.7% for suspicion of infection (? = 0.11, P < 0.001). Progression to severe sepsis or shock was highest when both providers suspected infection in a SIRS-positive patient (17.7%), was substantially reduced with single-provider suspicion (6.0%), and was lowest when neither provider suspected infection (1.5%) (P < 0.001). Provider disagreement regarding suspected infection is common, with RNs suspecting infection more often, suggesting that a collaborative model for sepsis detection may improve timing and accuracy. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:256-258.

SUBMITTER: Bhattacharjee P 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5865604 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Detecting Sepsis: Are Two Opinions Better Than One?

Bhattacharjee Poushali P   Churpek Matthew M MM   Snyder Ashley A   Howell Michael D MD   Edelson Dana P DP  

Journal of hospital medicine 20170401 4


The diagnosis of sepsis requires that objective criteria be met with a corresponding subjective suspicion of infection. We conducted a study to characterize the agreement between different providers' suspicion of infection and the correlation with patient outcomes using prospective data from a general medicine ward. Registered nurse (RN) suspicion of infection was collected every 12 hours and compared with medical doctor or advanced practice professional (MD/APP) suspicion, defined as an existin  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6715876 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1948959 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6125676 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7571320 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5320961 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7224563 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3899645 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3789709 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6346393 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8464963 | biostudies-literature