Dataset Information

Patient-initiated recruitment for clinical research: Evaluation of an outpatient letter research statement.

ABSTRACT:

Background

UK Hospital Trusts are charged with increasing patients' research awareness and willingness to take part in research. This includes implementing strategies to encourage patient-initiated enquiries about participation.

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of a research statement inserted in outpatient letters in one clinical service, and to derive suggestions on potential steps towards increasing patient-initiated recruitment.

Setting

A medical outpatient clinic of a research-active hospital trust, serving an inner-city multi-ethnic population across two boroughs.

Methods

Pre-intervention and post-intervention questionnaires were administered face-to-face to new patients. Questionnaires included closed questions and one open comments section. Data were analysed for frequencies, with thematic coding of open-ended responses.

Results

The response rates were 87% for the pre-intervention survey and 92% for the post-intervention survey. In the post-intervention survey, 85% of patients did not notice the research statement in the letter. More than half found the statement "a little unclear," whilst one-third considered it "clear." Three-quarters of respondents perceived the statement to be "a little helpful." Only one person enquired about participating in clinical research having read the statement in the outpatient letter.

Conclusion

The analysis suggests that simple, single-solution approaches such as including research statements in outpatient letters are unlikely to be sufficient to significantly facilitate patient-initiated recruitment. Recruitment efforts need to take into consideration the diversity of patient constituencies including the reasons they seek health care, and how patients can meaningfully access information (research literacy).

SUBMITTER: Wienroth M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5867329 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient-initiated recruitment for clinical research: Evaluation of an outpatient letter research statement.

Wienroth Matthias M Caffrey Louise L Wolfe Charles C McKevitt Christopher C

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 20171122 2

<h4>Background</h4>UK Hospital Trusts are charged with increasing patients' research awareness and willingness to take part in research. This includes implementing strategies to encourage patient-initiated enquiries about participation.<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the impact of a research statement inserted in outpatient letters in one clinical service, and to derive suggestions on potential steps towards increasing patient-initiated recruitment.<h4>Setting</h4>A medical outpatient clinic of a ...[more]

PMID: 29164743

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo determine whether direct access to hospital review initiated by patients with rheumatoid arthritis would result in improved clinical and psychological outcome, reduced overall use of healthcare resources, and greater satisfaction with care than seen in patients receiving regular review initiated by a rheumatologist.DesignTwo year randomised controlled trial extended to six years.SettingRheumatology outpatient department in teaching hospital.Participants209 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis for over two years; 68 (65%) in the direct access group and 52 (50%) in the control group completed the study (P = 0.04).Main outcome measuresClinical outcomepain, disease activity, early morning stiffness, inflammatory indices, disability, grip strength, range of movement in joints, and bone erosion. Psychological status: anxiety, depression, helplessness, self efficacy, satisfaction, and confidence in the system. Number of visits to hospital physician and general practitioner for arthritis.ResultsParticipants were well matched at baseline. After six years there was only one significant difference between the two groups for the 14 clinical outcomes measured (deterioration in range of movement in elbow was less in direct access patients). There were no significant differences between groups for median change in psychological status. Satisfaction and confidence in the system were significantly higher in the direct access group at two, four, and six years: confidence 9.8 v 8.4, 9.4 v 8.0, 8.7 v 6.9; satisfaction 9.3 v 8.3, 9.3 v 7.7, 8.9 v 7.1 (all P < 0.02). Patients in the direct access group had 38% fewer hospital appointments (median 8 v 13, P < 0.0001).ConclusionsOver six years, patients with rheumatoid arthritis who initiated their reviews through direct access were clinically and psychologically at least as well as patients having traditional reviews initiated by a physician. They requested fewer appointments, found direct access more acceptable, and had more than a third fewer medical appointments. This radical responsive management could be tested in other chronic diseases.

Project description:BackgroundPercutaneous kidney biopsies are essential for diagnosis and management of kidney diseases. However, post-procedural bleeding is a significant risk associated with biopsies. At the McGill University Health Center, the 2 main hospitals, the Royal Victoria Hospital and the Montreal General Hospital, have different observation protocols for outpatient native kidney biopsies. Currently, patients are admitted for a 24-hour inpatient observation at the Montreal General Hospital, whereas patients biopsied at the Royal Victoria Hospital are discharged after 6 to 8 hours of observation at the end of the day. Most Canadian centers do not admit patients for an overnight observation, and it was unclear why this practice continued at the Montreal General Hospital.ObjectiveOur objective was to determine the incidence of complications post-renal biopsy over the past 5 years at both hospital sites, and compare them to each other, as well as to established rates in the available literature.DesignThis assessment was designed as a quality assurance audit.SettingThis audit was conducted from a local registry of renal biopsies performed at the McGill University Health Center between January 2015 to January 2020.PatientsWe included all adult patients (between the ages 18 and 80) with outpatient native kidney biopsies performed at the McGill University Health Center between 2015 and 2020.MeasurementsWe collected the included patients' baseline demographics and risk factors at the time of biopsy, including age, BMI, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, pre- and post-biopsy hemoglobin, platelet, urea, coagulation profile, blood pressure, kidney side/size as well as needle size, and number of passes made.MethodsWe compared the incidence of both minor and major bleeding complications at the Montreal General and the Royal Victoria Hospital. Variables that were measured included hemoglobin before and after biopsy, incidence of minor bleeding complications (defined by hematomas and gross hematuria), and incidence of major complications (defined by post-biopsy bleeding requiring either transfusions or another procedure to stop the bleeding), as well as the incidence of admissions post-biopsy.ResultsThe incidence of major complications was 2.87% over 5 years (5/174 patients), which is comparable with that reported in the literature. Our transfusion incidence was 1.72% (3/174 patients) and our embolization incidence was 2.3% (4/174 patients) over the 5 study years. Our total number of major events was low and the patients who had major events had significant risk factors for bleeding. All events occurred within 6 hours of observation.LimitationsThis was a retrospective study with a low event number. Additionally, since the events included only those recorded at the McGill University Health Center, it is possible that the events of interest may have occurred at other hospital sites without the author's knowledge.ConclusionsBased on the results of this audit, all major bleeding events occurred within 6 hours of a percutaneous kidney biopsy, suggesting that patients should be monitored for 6 to 8 hours following biopsy. The next step after this quality assurance audit is a quality improvement project and a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess whether post-biopsy practices should be amended at the McGill University Health Center.

Project description:BackgroundEHR phenotyping offers the ability to rapidly assemble a precisely defined cohort of patients prescreened for eligibility to participate in health-related research. Even so, stakeholders in the process must still contend with the practical and ethical challenges associated with research recruitment. Patient perspectives on these matters are particularly important given that the success of research recruitment depends on patients' willingness to participate.MethodsWe conducted 15 focus groups (n =?110 participants) in four counties in diverse regions of the southeastern US: Appalachia, the Mississippi Delta, and the Piedmont area of North Carolina. Based on a hypothetical study of a behavioral intervention for type 2 diabetes, we asked about the acceptability and appropriateness of direct investigator versus physician-mediated contact with patients for research recruitment, and whether patients should be asked to opt in or opt out of further contact in response to recruitment letters.ResultsFor initial contact, nearly all participants said it would be acceptable for researchers to contact patients directly and three-fourths said that it would be acceptable for researchers to contact patients through their physicians. When we asked which would be most appropriate, a substantial majority chose direct contact. Themes that arose in the discussion included trust and transparency, decision-making power, the effect on research, and the effect on patient care. For response expectations, the vast majority of participants said both opt-in and opt-out would be acceptable-typically finding neither especially problematic and noting that both afford patients the opportunity to make their own decisions.ConclusionsExternal validity relies heavily on researchers' success enrolling eligible patients and failure to reach accrual targets is a costly and common barrier to advancing scientific knowledge. Our results suggest that patients recognize multiple advantages and disadvantages of different research recruitment strategies and place value on the implications not just for themselves, but also for researchers and healthcare providers. Our findings, including rich qualitative detail, contribute to the body of empirical and ethical literature on improving research recruitment and suggest specific ways forward as well as important areas for future research.

Project description:BackgroundClinical research nurses (CRNs) have first-hand experience with ethical challenges and play a crucial role in upholding ethical conduct and adherence to the principles of informed consent in clinical research. This study explores the ethical challenges encountered by CRNs in the process of obtaining informed consent for clinical research.MethodsA qualitative exploratory design. Semistructured interviews (n = 14) were conducted with diverse CRNs in Sweden. These CRNs covered a wide range of research fields, including pharmaceutical and academic studies, interventions, and observational research, spanning different trial phases, patient categories, and medical conditions. The interviews were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis.ResultsThe analysis identified three main categories: (i) threats to voluntariness, (ii) measures to safeguard voluntariness, and (iii) questionable exclusion of certain groups. CRNs face challenges due to time constraints, rushed decisions, information overload, and excessive reliance on physicians' recommendations. Overestimating therapeutic benefits in stages of advanced illness emerged as a risk to voluntariness. CRNs outlined proactive solutions, such as allowing ample decision-making time and offering support, especially for terminally ill patients. Concerns were also voiced about excluding certain demographics, such as those with language barriers or cognitive impairments.ConclusionsIn conclusion, upholding ethical research standards requires recognising various factors affecting patient voluntariness. Researchers and CRNs should prioritise refining the informed consent process, overcoming participation challenges, and aligning scientific rigour with personalised care. Additionally, a concerted effort is vital to meet the diverse needs of patient populations, including equitable inclusion of individuals with language barriers or cognitive limitations in clinical studies. These findings have significant implications for enhancing the ethics of clinical research and advancing person-centred care.

Project description:Introduction/objectivesIn February 2019, recruitment began in Iowa Research Network offices for a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) funded Advance Care Planning (ACP) study to be conducted in 7 primary care practice-based research networks across the United States and Canada. The main study trained clinicians and nursing staff in serious illness care conversations and requested they refer eligible patients. Eligible patients were those with serious illness or frailty expected to live 1 to 2 years. Clinicians indicated it was difficult to identify eligible patients. This study aimed to find better methods for increasing patient recruitment for the ACP study.MethodsResearch staff brainstormed and implemented strategies to increase patient referrals from clinicians. Participating offices used Epic for their medical record and the Gagne Index was used to generate a list of eligible patients in Epic SlicerDicer. When patients from the Epic SlicerDicer report appeared on the schedule, clinicians and nursing staff were notified that they might be eligible for ACP. Clinicians and nursing staff were asked to complete a survey identifying their perception of implemented strategies. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare referral numbers before and after the Gagne Index/Epic SlicerDicer intervention.ResultsSeven clinicians referred patients prior to and 11 after the Gagne Index/Epic SlicerDicer intervention. Clinicians referred a total of 120 patients; 31 patients prior to and 89 patients after the Gagne Index/Epic SlicerDicer implementation (P = .002). Survey results indicated that several strategies facilitated clinician referrals, including patients identified as potentially appropriate on the schedule, quarterly meetings with researchers, and e-mails with a list of potentially eligible patients.ConclusionsNotifying clinical staff about potential study participants increased patient referrals in this ACP study. Research staff must have time, funding, and patience to support clinical staff who are expected to refer patients to studies.

Dataset Information

Patient-initiated recruitment for clinical research: Evaluation of an outpatient letter research statement.

Background

Objectives

Setting

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Patient-initiated recruitment for clinical research: Evaluation of an outpatient letter research statement.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets