Dataset Information

The clinical impact of detector choice for beam scanning.

ABSTRACT: Recently, the developers of Eclipse have recommended the use of ionization chambers for all profile scanning, including for the modeling of VMAT and stereotactic applications. The purpose of this study is to show the clinical impact caused by the choice of detector with respect to its ability to accurately measure dose in the penumbra and tail regions of a scanned profile. Using scan data acquired with several detectors, including an IBA CC13, a PTW 60012, and a Sun Nuclear EDGE Detector, three complete beam models are created, one for each respective detector. Next, using each beam model, dose volumes are retrospectively recalculated from actual anonymous patient plans. These plans include three full-arc VMAT prostate plans, three left chest wall plans delivered using irregular compensators, two half-arc VMAT lung plans, three MLC-collimated static-field pairs, and two SBRT liver plans. Finally, plans are reweighted to deliver the same number of monitor units, and mean dose-to-target volumes and organs at risk are calculated and compared. Penumbra width did not play a role. Dose in the tail region of the profile made the largest difference. By overresponding in the tail region of the profile, the 60012 diode detector scan data affected the beam model in such a way that target doses were reduced by as much as 0.4% (in comparison to CC13 and EDGE data). This overresponse also resulted in an overestimation of dose to peripheral critical structure, whose dose consisted mainly of scatter. This study shows that, for modeling the 6 MV beam of Acuros XB in Eclipse Version 11, the choice to use a CC13 scanning ion chamber or an EDGE Detector was an unimportant choice, providing nearly identical models in the treatment planning system.

SUBMITTER: Gersh JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5875504 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The clinical impact of detector choice for beam scanning.

Gersh Jacob A JA Best Ryan C M RC Watts Ronald J RJ

Journal of applied clinical medical physics 20140708 4

Recently, the developers of Eclipse have recommended the use of ionization chambers for all profile scanning, including for the modeling of VMAT and stereotactic applications. The purpose of this study is to show the clinical impact caused by the choice of detector with respect to its ability to accurately measure dose in the penumbra and tail regions of a scanned profile. Using scan data acquired with several detectors, including an IBA CC13, a PTW 60012, and a Sun Nuclear EDGE Detector, three ...[more]

PMID: 25207408

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeA clinical-prototype, dedicated, cone-beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) system with offset detector is undergoing clinical evaluation at our institution. This study is to estimate the normalized glandular dose coefficients ( DgNCT ) that provide air kerma-to-mean glandular dose conversion factors using Monte Carlo simulations.Materials and methodsThe clinical prototype CBBCT system uses 49 kV x-ray spectrum with 1.39 mm 1st half-value layer thickness. Monte Carlo simulations (GATE, version 8) were performed with semi-ellipsoidal, homogeneous breasts of various fibroglandular weight fractions ( fg=0.01,0.15,0.5,1) , chest wall diameters ( d=8,10,14,18,20 cm), and chest wall to nipple length ( l=0.75d ), aligned with the axis of rotation (AOR) located at 65 cm from the focal spot to determine the DgNCT . Three geometries were considered - 40×30 -cm detector with no offset that served as reference and corresponds to a clinical CBBCT system, 30×30 -cm detector with 5 cm offset, and a 30×30 -cm detector with 10 cm offset.ResultsFor 5 cm lateral offset, the DgNCT ranged 0.177-0.574 mGy/mGy and reduction in DgNCT with respect to reference geometry was observed only for 18 cm ( 6.4%±0.23% ) and 20 cm ( 9.6%±0.22% ) diameter breasts. For the 10 cm lateral offset, the DgNCT ranged 0.221-0.581 mGy/mGy and reduction in DgNCT was observed for all breast diameters. The reduction in DgNCT was 1.4%±0.48% , 7.1%±0.13% , 17.5%±0.19% , 25.1%±0.15% , and 27.7%±0.08% for 8, 10, 14, 18, and 20 cm diameter breasts, respectively. For a given breast diameter, the reduction in DgNCT with offset-detector geometries was not dependent on fg . Numerical fits of DgNCTd,l,fg were generated for each geometry.ConclusionThe DgNCT and the numerical fit, DgNCTd,l,fg would be of benefit for current CBBCT systems using the reference geometry and for future generations using offset-detector geometry. There exists a potential for radiation dose reduction with offset-detector geometry, provided the same technique factors as the reference geometry are used, and the image quality is clinically acceptable.

Project description:Proton therapy makes use of the favorable depth-dose distribution with its characteristic Bragg peak to spare normal tissue distal of the target volume. A steep dose gradient would be desired in lateral dimensions, too. The widespread spot scanning delivery technique is based, however, on pencil-beams with in-air spot full-widths-at-half-maximum of typically 1 cm or more. This hampers the sparing of organs-at-risk if small-scale structures adjacent to the target volume are concerned. The trimming of spot scanning fields with collimating apertures constitutes a simple measure to increase the transversal dose gradient. The current study describes the clinical implementation of brass apertures in conjunction with the pencil-beam scanning delivery mode at a horizontal, clinical treatment head based on commercial hardware and software components. Furthermore, clinical cases, which comprised craniopharyngiomas, re-irradiations and ocular tumors, were evaluated. The dosimetric benefits of 31 treatment plans using apertures were compared to the corresponding plans without aperture. Furthermore, an overview of the radiation protection aspects is given. Regarding the results, robust optimization considering range and setup uncertainties was combined with apertures. The treatment plan optimizations followed a single-field uniform dose or a restricted multi-field optimization approach. Robustness evaluation was expanded to account for possible deviations of the center of the pencil-beam delivery and the mechanical center of the aperture holder. Supplementary apertures improved the conformity index on average by 15.3%. The volume of the dose gradient surrounding the PTV (evaluated between 80 and 20% dose levels) was decreased on average by 17.6%. The mean dose of the hippocampi could be reduced on average by 2.9 GyRBE. In particular cases the apertures facilitated a sparing of an organ-at-risk, e.g. the eye lens or the brainstem. For six craniopharyngioma cases the inclusion of apertures led to a reduction of the mean dose of 1.5 GyRBE (13%) for the brain and 3.1 GyRBE (16%) for the hippocampi.

Project description:An iterative method is proposed to calibrate radiation sensitivities of an arbitrary two-dimensional (2D) array of detectors. The array is irradiated with a wide open- field beam at the central position, as well as at laterally and longitudinal shifted positions; the 2D beam profile of the wide field is reconstructed iteratively from the ratios of shifted images to the central image. The propagation errors due to output variation and inaccurate array positioning are estimated and removed from the reconstructed beam profile by an error-locking scheme with narrow open-field irradiations. The beam profile is interpolated when necessary and then compared to raw detector responses to determine sensitivities. Two additional methods were implemented for comparison: 1) the commercial iterative calibration method for MapCHECK2 with translation and rotation operations; 2) a labor-intensive noniterative method without the issue of error propagation. A MapCHECK2 2D detector array was used to validate the proposed method with the 6 MV photon beam from a Varian iX linear accelerator. All calibration methods were repeated three times. A total of 5, 9, and 29 irradiations were required to implement the commercial method, the proposed method and the noniterative method respec- tively. Moreover, a 5 mm positioning error was intentionally introduced into the calibration procedures of the commercial and the proposed method to test their robustness. Under the normal operation condition of the linear accelerator and with careful alignment of the MapCHECK2, the deviations of the calibrated sensitivities of the proposed method and commercial method with respect to the noniterative method were 0.30% ± 0.29% and 0.92% ± 0.63% respectively; when the 5 mm positioning error was presented, these two methods resulted in deviations of 0.40% ± 0.36% and 3.58% ± 1.94%, respectively. A patient study suggested that, due to this 5 mm positioning error, the mean DTA (dose to agreement) passing rate by the commercial method was 2.7% lower than that by the noniterative method, whereas the proposed method led to a comparable passing rate. It is evident from this study that the proposed iterative method leads to within 1% mean calibration results to established methods. It requires much fewer number of measurements than noniterative method and is more robust against the positioning error than the commercial iterative method. The method also eliminates the need of rotation operations and, therefore, is applicable to inline detector arrays without rotation function, such as electronic portal imager device (EPID).

Dataset Information

The clinical impact of detector choice for beam scanning.

Publications

The clinical impact of detector choice for beam scanning.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets