Dataset Information

Community Oncologists' Decision-Making for Treatment of Older Patients With Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Background: This study's objectives were to describe community oncologists' beliefs about and confidence with geriatric care and to determine whether geriatric-relevant information influences cancer treatment decisions. Methods: Community oncologists were recruited to participate in 2 multisite geriatric oncology trials. Participants shared their beliefs about and confidence in caring for older adults. They were also asked to make a first-line chemotherapy recommendation (combination vs single-agent vs no chemotherapy) for a hypothetical vignette of an older patient with advanced pancreatic cancer. Each oncologist received one randomly chosen vignette that varied on 3 variables: age (72/84 years), impaired function (yes/no), and cognitive impairment (yes/no). Other patient characteristics were held constant. Logistic regression models were used to identify associations between oncologist/vignette-patient characteristics and treatment decisions. Results: Oncologist response rate was 61% (n=305/498). Most oncologists agreed that "the care of older adults with cancer needs to be improved" (89%) and that "geriatrics training is essential" (72%). However, <25% were "very confident" in recognizing dementia or conducting a fall risk or functional assessment, and only 23% reported using the geriatric assessment in clinic. Each randomly varied patient characteristic was independently associated with the decision to treat: younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.01; 95% CI, 2.73-9.20), normal cognition (aOR, 5.42; 95% CI, 3.01-9.76), and being functionally intact (aOR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.12-7.00). Accounting for all vignettes across all scenarios, 161 oncologists (52%) said they would offer chemotherapy. All variables were independently associated with prescribing single-agent over combination chemotherapy (older age: aOR, 3.22; 95% CI 1.43-7.25, impaired cognition: aOR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.36-7.20, impaired function: aOR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.12-5.72). Oncologists' characteristics were not associated with decisions about providing chemotherapy. Conclusion: Geriatric-relevant information, when available, strongly influences community oncologists' treatment decisions.

SUBMITTER: Mohile SG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5878087 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Community Oncologists' Decision-Making for Treatment of Older Patients With Cancer.

Mohile Supriya G SG Magnuson Allison A Pandya Chintan C Velarde Carla C Duberstein Paul P Hurria Arti A Loh Kah Poh KP Wells Megan M Plumb Sandy S Gilmore Nikesha N Flannery Marie M Wittink Marsha M Epstein Ronald R Heckler Charles E CE Janelsins Michelle M Mustian Karen K Hopkins Judith O JO Liu Jane J Peri Srihari S Dale William W

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN 20180301 3

<b>Background:</b> This study's objectives were to describe community oncologists' beliefs about and confidence with geriatric care and to determine whether geriatric-relevant information influences cancer treatment decisions. <b>Methods:</b> Community oncologists were recruited to participate in 2 multisite geriatric oncology trials. Participants shared their beliefs about and confidence in caring for older adults. They were also asked to make a first-line chemotherapy recommendation (combinati ...[more]

PMID: 29523669

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeAlthough comorbidities, frailty, and functional impairment are common in older adults (OA) with cancer, little is known about how these factors are considered during the treatment decision-making process by OAs, their families, and health care providers. Our aim was to better understand the treatment decision process from all these perspectives.MethodsA mixed methods multi-perspective longitudinal study using semi-structured interviews and surveys with 29 OAs aged ?70 years with advanced prostate, breast, colorectal, or lung cancer, 24 of their family members,13 oncologists, and 15 family physicians was conducted. The sample was stratified on age (70-79 and 80+). All interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsThere was no difference in the treatment decision-making experience based on age. Most OAs felt that they should have the final say in the treatment decision, but strongly valued their oncologists' opinion. "Trust in my oncologist" and "chemotherapy as the last resort to prolong life" were the most important reasons to accept treatment. Families indicated a need to improve communication between them, the patient and the specialist, particularly around goals of treatment. Comorbidity and potential side-effects did not play a major role in the treatment decision-making for patients, families, or oncologists. Family physicians reported no involvement in decisions but desired to be more involved.ConclusionThis first study using multiple perspectives showed neither frailty nor comorbidity played a role in the treatment decision-making process. Efforts to improve communication were identified as an opportunity that may enhance quality of care. In a mixed methods study multiple perspective study with older adults with cancer, their family members, their oncologist and their family physician we explored the treatment decision making process and found that most older adults were satisfied with their decision. Comorbidity, functional status and frailty did not impact the older adult's or their family members' decision.

Project description:BackgroundNeurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are present across various tumor types with an estimated overall prevalence of less than 1%. Tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors (TRKis) block the constitutively activated tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) fusion protein produced in cancers with NTRK gene fusions (NTRK+) from downstream signaling. Many treatment guidelines now include TRKis as first-line (1L) or subsequent treatment options for TRK fusion cancer.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess treatment patterns subsequent to a finding of NTRK+ status among patients with TRK fusion cancer.Patients and methodsThis was a one-time, retrospective, multi-site patient chart abstraction by oncology practices in the USA from June to September 2020. US medical oncologists from the Oncology Provider Extended Network (OPEN) who had treated patients with NTRK+ advanced/metastatic solid tumors abstracted information into electronic case report forms (eCRFs) for adult patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors and a NTRK+ tumor test result with a known fusion partner. Data abstracted into eCRFs by oncologists included demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of patients with advanced/metastatic TRK fusion solid tumors. Responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. Median treatment durations across the lines of therapy were estimated by Kaplan-Meier time to discontinuation.ResultsA total of 19 medical oncologists abstracted data from 110 patient charts. Median patient age at advanced/metastatic diagnosis was 62 years. The majority of patients were male (58.2%) and White (79.1%). Solid tumor types reported in at least 10% of the study cohort were lung (24.5%), cholangiocarcinoma (13.6%), pancreatic (10.9%), and colorectal (10.0%). Results for patients with hepatobiliary cancers (i.e., cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma) and colorectal cancer, and appendiceal cancer are also included. Median duration of 1L TRKi therapy was 16.8 months across all solid tumor types, whereas median duration of 1L was 5.6 months among patients receiving non-TRKi therapies (p = 0.017). Among the solid tumor types represented by at least 10% of the study population, median duration of 1L TRKi therapy was only reached in patients with pancreatic cancer (3.3 months). Median duration of TRKi in the second-line (2L) setting was 7.9 months overall, relative to 5.3 months among patients receiving non-TRKi therapies (p = 0.003). Across lung, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers, the median durations of 2L TRKi therapy were 14.1, 6.0, 6.1, and 4.1 months, respectively.Conclusion and relevanceAmong patients with advanced/metastatic TRK fusion solid tumors, medical oncologists reported that approximately two-thirds initiated a TRKi during the study period. Treatment with a TRKi was longer in duration compared to non-TRKi treatment in 1L and 2L therapy. Additional research is needed to gain insight into the association between early TRKi therapy initiation and clinical outcomes in the real-world setting.

Dataset Information

Community Oncologists' Decision-Making for Treatment of Older Patients With Cancer.

Publications

Community Oncologists' Decision-Making for Treatment of Older Patients With Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets