Dataset Information

Paratracheal Paraseptal Emphysema and Expiratory Central Airway Collapse in Smokers.

ABSTRACT: RATIONALE:Expiratory central airway collapse is associated with respiratory morbidity independent of underlying lung disease. However, not all smokers develop expiratory central airway collapse, and the etiology of expiratory central airway collapse in adult smokers is unclear. Paraseptal emphysema in the paratracheal location, by untethering airway walls, may predispose smokers to developing expiratory central airway collapse. OBJECTIVES:To evaluate whether paratracheal paraseptal emphysema is associated with expiratory central airway collapse. METHODS:We analyzed paired inspiratory and expiratory computed tomography scans from participants enrolled in a multicenter study (Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) of smokers aged 45 to 80 years. Expiratory central airway collapse was defined as greater than or equal to 50% reduction in cross-sectional area of the trachea during expiration. In a nested case-control design, participants with and without expiratory central airway collapse were included in a 1:2 fashion, and inspiratory scans were further analyzed using the Fleischner Society criteria for presence of centrilobular emphysema, paraseptal emphysema, airway wall thickening, and paratracheal paraseptal emphysema (maximal diameter???0.5 cm). RESULTS:A total of 1,320 patients were included, 440 with and 880 without expiratory central airway collapse. Those with expiratory central airway collapse were older, had higher body mass index, and were less likely to be men or current smokers. Paratracheal paraseptal emphysema was more frequent in those with expiratory central airway collapse than control subjects (16.6 vs. 11.8%; P?=?0.016), and after adjustment for age, race, sex, body mass index, smoking pack-years, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, paratracheal paraseptal emphysema was independently associated with expiratory central airway collapse (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.98; P?=?0.001). Furthermore, increasing size of paratracheal paraseptal emphysema (maximal diameter of at least 1 cm and 1.5 cm) was associated with greater odds of expiratory central airway collapse (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.25; P?=?0.003 and 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.64; P?=?0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Paraseptal emphysema adjacent to the trachea is associated with expiratory central airway collapse. The identification of this risk factor on inspiratory scans should prompt further evaluation for expiratory central airway collapse. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 00608764).

SUBMITTER: Copeland CR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5879141 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Paratracheal Paraseptal Emphysema and Expiratory Central Airway Collapse in Smokers.

Copeland Carla R CR Nath Hrudaya H Terry Nina L J NLJ Wilson Carla G CG Kim Young-Il YI Lynch David A DA Bodduluri Sandeep S Wells J Michael JM Dransfield Mark T MT Díaz Alejandro A AA Washko George R GR Foreman Marilyn G MG Bhatt Surya P SP

Annals of the American Thoracic Society 20180401 4

<h4>Rationale</h4>Expiratory central airway collapse is associated with respiratory morbidity independent of underlying lung disease. However, not all smokers develop expiratory central airway collapse, and the etiology of expiratory central airway collapse in adult smokers is unclear. Paraseptal emphysema in the paratracheal location, by untethering airway walls, may predispose smokers to developing expiratory central airway collapse.<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate whether paratracheal parasepta ...[more]

PMID: 29298081

Similar Datasets

Project description:IMPORTANCE:Central airway collapse greater than 50% of luminal area during exhalation (expiratory central airway collapse [ECAC]) is associated with cigarette smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, its prevalence and clinical significance are unknown. OBJECTIVE:To determine whether ECAC is associated with respiratory morbidity in smokers independent of underlying lung disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:Analysis of paired inspiratory-expiratory computed tomography images from a large multicenter study (COPDGene) of current and former smokers from 21 clinical centers across the United States. Participants were enrolled from January 2008 to June 2011 and followed up longitudinally until October 2014. Images were initially screened using a quantitative method to detect at least a 30% reduction in minor axis tracheal diameter from inspiration to end-expiration. From this sample of screen-positive scans, cross-sectional area of the trachea was measured manually at 3 predetermined levels (aortic arch, carina, and bronchus intermedius) to confirm ECAC (>50% reduction in cross-sectional area). EXPOSURES:Expiratory central airway collapse. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:The primary outcome was baseline respiratory quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] scale 0 to 100; 100 represents worst health status; minimum clinically important difference [MCID], 4 units). Secondary outcomes were baseline measures of dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] scale 0 to 4; 4 represents worse dyspnea; MCID, 0.7 units), baseline 6-minute walk distance (MCID, 30 m), and exacerbation frequency (events per 100 person-years) on longitudinal follow-up. RESULTS:The study included 8820 participants with and without COPD (mean age, 59.7 [SD, 6.9] years; 4667 [56.7%] men; 4559 [51.7%] active smokers). The prevalence of ECAC was 5% (443 cases). Patients with ECAC compared with those without ECAC had worse SGRQ scores (30.9 vs 26.5 units; P?<?.001; absolute difference, 4.4 [95% CI, 2.2-6.6]) and mMRC scale scores (median, 2 [interquartile range [IQR], 0-3]) vs 1 [IQR, 0-3]; P?<?.001]), but no significant difference in 6-minute walk distance (399 vs 417 m; absolute difference, 18 m [95% CI, 6-30]; P?=?.30), after adjustment for age, sex, race, body mass index, forced expiratory volume in the first second, pack-years of smoking, and emphysema. On follow-up (median, 4.3 [IQR, 3.2-4.9] years), participants with ECAC had increased frequency of total exacerbations (58 vs 35 events per 100 person-years; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.29-1.72]; P?<?.001) and severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization (17 vs 10 events per 100 person-years; IRR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.51-2.21]; P?<?.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:In a cross-sectional analysis of current and former smokers, the presence of ECAC was associated with worse respiratory quality of life. Further studies are needed to assess long-term associations with clinical outcomes.

Project description:PurposeWe noted incidental findings on chest computed tomography (CT) imaging of expiratory central airway collapse (ECAC) in dyspneic patients after military deployment to southwest Asia (mainly Iraq and Afghanistan). We developed a standardized chest CT protocol with dynamic expiration to enhance diagnostic reliability and investigated demographic, clinical, and deployment characteristics possibly associated with ECAC.Materials and methodsWe calculated ECAC in 62 consecutive post-9/11 deployers with dyspnea who underwent multi-detector chest CT acquisition. ECAC was defined as ≥70% reduction in the cross-sectional tracheal area at dynamic expiration. We compared demographics (age, smoking, body mass index), comorbid conditions (gastroesophageal reflux, obstructive sleep apnea [OSA]), and clinical findings (air trapping, forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted) in deployers with and without ECAC. We examined associations between ECAC and forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted, air trapping, OSA, deployment duration, and blast exposure.ResultsAmong 62 consecutive deployers with persistent dyspnea, 37% had ECAC. Three had severe (>85%) collapse. Those with ECAC were older (mean age 46 vs. 40 y, P=0.02), but no other demographic or clinical characteristics were statistically different among the groups. Although not statistically significant, ECAC odds were 1.5 times higher (95% confidence interval: 0.9, 2.5) for each additional year of southwest Asia deployment. Deployers with ECAC had 1.6 times greater odds (95% confidence interval: 0.5, 4.8) of OSA.ConclusionsFindings suggest that ECAC is common in symptomatic southwest Asia deployers. Chest high-resolution CT with dynamic expiration may provide an insight into the causes of dyspnea in this population, although risk factors for ECAC remain to be determined. A standardized semiquantitative approach to CT-based assessment of ECAC should improve reliable diagnosis in dyspneic patients.

Project description:Spirometric parameters are the mainstay for diagnosis of COPD, but cannot distinguish airway obstruction from emphysema. We aimed to develop a computer model that quantifies airway collapse on forced expiratory flow-volume loops. We then explored and validated the relationship of airway collapse with computed tomography (CT) diagnosed emphysema in two large independent cohorts.A computer model was developed in 513 Caucasian individuals with ?15 pack-years who performed spirometry, diffusion capacity and CT scans to quantify emphysema presence. The model computed the two best fitting regression lines on the expiratory phase of the flow-volume loop and calculated the angle between them. The collapse was expressed as an Angle of collapse (AC) which was then correlated with the presence of emphysema. Findings were validated in an independent group of 340 individuals.AC in emphysema subjects (N?=?251) was significantly lower (131°?±?14°) compared to AC in subjects without emphysema (N?=?223), (152°?±?10°) (p?<?0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed AC as best indicator of visually scored emphysema (R2?=?0.505, p?<?0.0001) with little significant contribution of KCO, %predicted and FEV1, %predicted to the total model (total R2?=?0.626, p?<?0.0001). Similar associations were obtained when using CT-automated density scores for emphysema assessment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves pointed to 131° as the best cut-off for emphysema (95.5% positive predictive value, 97% specificity and 51% sensitivity). Validation in a second group confirmed the significant difference in mean AC between emphysema and non-emphysema subjects. When applying the 131° cut-off, a positive predictive value of 95.6%, a specificity of 96% and a sensitivity of 59% were demonstrated.Airway collapse on forced expiration quantified by a computer model correlates with emphysema. An AC below 131° can be considered as a specific cut-off for predicting the presence of emphysema in heavy smokers.

Dataset Information

Paratracheal Paraseptal Emphysema and Expiratory Central Airway Collapse in Smokers.

Publications

Paratracheal Paraseptal Emphysema and Expiratory Central Airway Collapse in Smokers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets