Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Disproportionate Sterilization of Latinos Under California's Eugenic Sterilization Program, 1920-1945.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:To compare population-based sterilization rates between Latinas/os and non-Latinas/os sterilized under California's eugenics law. METHODS:We used data from 17?362 forms recommending institutionalized patients for sterilization between 1920 and 1945. We abstracted patient gender, age, and institution of residence into a data set. We extracted data on institution populations from US Census microdata from 1920, 1930, and 1940 and interpolated between census years. We used Spanish surnames to identify Latinas/os in the absence of data on race/ethnicity. We used Poisson regression with a random effect for each patient's institution of residence to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and compare sterilization rates between Latinas/os and non-Latinas/os, stratifying on gender and adjusting for differences in age and year of sterilization. RESULTS:Latino men were more likely to be sterilized than were non-Latino men (IRR?=?1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?1.15, 1.31), and Latina women experienced an even more disproportionate risk of sterilization relative to non-Latinas (IRR?=?1.59; 95% CI?=?1.48, 1.70). CONCLUSIONS:Eugenic sterilization laws were disproportionately applied to Latina/o patients, particularly Latina women and girls. Understanding historical injustices in public health can inform contemporary public health practice.

SUBMITTER: Novak NL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5888070 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Disproportionate Sterilization of Latinos Under California's Eugenic Sterilization Program, 1920-1945.

Novak Nicole L NL   Lira Natalie N   O'Connor Kate E KE   Harlow Siobán D SD   Kardia Sharon L R SLR   Stern Alexandra Minna AM  

American journal of public health 20180322 5


<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare population-based sterilization rates between Latinas/os and non-Latinas/os sterilized under California's eugenics law.<h4>Methods</h4>We used data from 17 362 forms recommending institutionalized patients for sterilization between 1920 and 1945. We abstracted patient gender, age, and institution of residence into a data set. We extracted data on institution populations from US Census microdata from 1920, 1930, and 1940 and interpolated between census years. We used  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5308144 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7839637 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9299598 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6951861 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6014881 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4874826 | biostudies-literature
2021-09-09 | PXD018059 | Pride
| S-EPMC6038989 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5663427 | biostudies-literature