Dataset Information

Insulin/Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Are Two Agents Better Than One?

ABSTRACT: IN BRIEF Given the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes, treatment intensification is usually necessary to maintain glycemic control. However, for a variety of reasons, treatment is often not intensified in a timely manner. The combined use of basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist is recognized to provide a complementary approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of two co-formulation products, insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine/lixisenatide, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on either component agent alone. We consider the benefits and limitations of these medications based on data from randomized clinical trials and discuss how they may address barriers to treatment intensification.

SUBMITTER: Aroda VR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5898167 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Insulin/Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Are Two Agents Better Than One?

Aroda Vanita R VR Arulandu Joseph R JR Cannon Anthony J AJ

Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association 20180401 2

<b>IN BRIEF</b> Given the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes, treatment intensification is usually necessary to maintain glycemic control. However, for a variety of reasons, treatment is often not intensified in a timely manner. The combined use of basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist is recognized to provide a complementary approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of two co-formulation products, insulin degludec/lirag ...[more]

PMID: 29686453

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe objective of this study was to evaluate real-world treatment patterns of type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in Germany (GE), the United Kingdom (UK), France (FR), the Netherlands (NE), Belgium (BE), and Sweden (SE).MethodsAdult T2D patients initiating exenatide twice daily (exBID), liraglutide once daily (LIRA) or exenatide once weekly (exQW) were identified using the IMS LifeLink™ (IMS Health, Danbury, CT, USA): Electronic Medical Records (EMR; GE/UK/FR) and IMS LifeLink™: longitudinal prescriptions (LRx; NE/BE/GE/UK) databases, and national health register data (SE), between 2010 and 2012. Therapy initiation date was termed 'index date'. Eligible patients had ?180-day pre- and variable follow-up (minimum ?360-day post-index exBID and LIRA, ?180-day post-index exQW). Treatment modification and persistence were evaluated over 180 days. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models (PHMs; EMR databases only) evaluated stopping of the index therapy (measured as first of discontinuation or switch).Results30,206 exBID, 5,401 exQW, and 52,155 LIRA patients were included in the analysis (46.0-66.9% male; mean age range 55.4-59.3 years). Mean follow-up was 20.3-27.4 months for exBID and LIRA, and 7.6-13.9 months for exQW. Across the databases, the proportion experiencing a treatment modification at 180 days was highest among exBID (37.6-81.7%) compared to LIRA (36.8-56.6%) and exQW (32.3-47.7%). The proportion persistent at 180 days was lowest among exBID patients (46.8-73.5%) compared to LIRA (50.6-80.1%) or exQW (57.5-74.6%). In the KM analyses, LIRA patients had a lower proportion stopping therapy at all time points compared to exBID patients, across the databases. In the Cox PHMs, LIRA was associated with a significantly lower risk of stopping compared to exBID; in GE, exQW was associated with a lower risk compared to exBID and LIRA.ConclusionTreatment patterns varied among GLP-1 RA patients, with persistence highest among either LIRA or exQW across countries, and lowest among exBID. Longer-term data would be useful, particularly given limited exQW follow-up due to more recent launch.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Dulaglutide is a new, long-acting glucagon-like peptide analogue in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. It is available in two doses, 0.75 and 1.5 mg, given by injection once weekly. This systematic review reports the effectiveness and safety of dulaglutide in type 2 diabetes in dual and triple therapy. METHODS:MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, and conference abstracts were searched from 2005 to August 2014, and updated in January 2015. Company websites and references of included studies were checked for potentially relevant studies. European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration websites were searched. RESULTS:Four trials were included. All were manufacturer-funded randomized controlled trials from the Assessment of Weekly Administration of Dulaglutide in Diabetes (AWARD) program. AWARD-1 compared dulaglutide 1.5 mg against exenatide 10 µg twice daily and placebo, AWARD-2 compared dulaglutide 0.75 and 1.5 mg against insulin glargine, AWARD-5 compared dulaglutide 0.75 and 1.5 mg against sitagliptin 100 mg and placebo, and AWARD-6 compared dulaglutide 1.5 mg against liraglutide 1.8 mg. The duration of follow-up in the trials ranged from 26 to 104 weeks. The primary outcome of all the included trials was change in HbA1c. At 26 weeks, greater HbA1c reductions were seen with dulaglutide than with twice daily exenatide (dulaglutide 1.5/0.75 mg: -1.5%/-1.3%; exe: 0.99%) and sitagliptin (1.5/0.75 mg -1.22%/-1.01%; sitagliptin: -0.6%). HbA1c change was greater with dulaglutide 1.5 mg (-1.08%) than with glargine (-0.63%), but not with dulaglutide 0.75 mg (-0.76%). Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was found to be noninferior to liraglutide 1.8 mg. More patients treated with dulaglutide achieved HbA1c targets of <7% and ≤6.5%. Reduction in weight was greater with dulaglutide than with sitagliptin and exenatide. Hypoglycemia was infrequent. The main adverse events were nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. CONCLUSION:Dulaglutide is effective in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes but we need long follow-up data for safety concerns.

Dataset Information

Insulin/Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Are Two Agents Better Than One?

Publications

Insulin/Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Are Two Agents Better Than One?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure