Dataset Information

Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

ABSTRACT: A novel reduction technique of intramedullary nailing (IMN) for femoral shaft fractures was introduced, and in this study, its therapeutic effect was compared with patients treated with the traditional traction table. From November 2012 to August 2015, the patients with femoral shaft fractures fixed with anterograde IMN were reviewed. Seventy-four patients treated with the traction table and forty-eight patients treated with the double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) met the inclusion criteria of this study. The surgical time, blood loss, open reduction rate and complications were reviewed in this study. The fracture healing was assessed by the radiographs conducted at each follow-up. The functional outcome (hip and knee flexion, Harris Hip Score, and Lysholm knee score) was evaluated at the final follow-up. Average surgical time, blood loss, hip and knee flexion, and Harris Hip Score showed no difference (P > 0.05) between the two groups. However, the DRTR was superior to the traction table in fracture healing, Lysholm knee score, open reduction and complications rate (P < 0.05). Thus, we concluded that minimally invasive treatment of femoral shaft fractures could be obtained with the DRTR.

SUBMITTER: Zhang R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5899094 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

Zhang Ruipeng R Yin Yingchao Y Li Shilun S Jin Lin L Hou Zhiyong Z Zhang Yingze Y

Scientific reports 20180413 1

A novel reduction technique of intramedullary nailing (IMN) for femoral shaft fractures was introduced, and in this study, its therapeutic effect was compared with patients treated with the traditional traction table. From November 2012 to August 2015, the patients with femoral shaft fractures fixed with anterograde IMN were reviewed. Seventy-four patients treated with the traction table and forty-eight patients treated with the double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) met the inclusion criteria ...[more]

PMID: 29654282

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCurrently, we found that double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) is a treatment with operation convenience and fast in our clinical work. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of DRTR in the reduction of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients remain unknown. Therefore, the study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of DRTR and traction table (TT) in the reduction of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.MethodsFrom October 2018 to December 2020, the elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were reviewed. 22 patients treated with TT and 20 patients treated with DRTR met the inclusion criteria of this study, and baseline clinical characteristics were recorded. The reduction time, operation time, incision length and intraoperative blood loss were reviewed. The safety outcome was assessed by postoperative complications, and the efficacy outcomes were evaluated by the fracture healing time based on the radiographs conducted at each follow-up (1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery) and hip function (hip flexion, Harris Hip Score) at the final follow-up (12 months after surgery).ResultsThere were no significant differences in terms of demographics and fracture characteristics of cases enrolled. In DRTR group, the average intraoperative reduction time [(34.8±7.6) min] and the average operation time [(87.1±12.2) min] were superior to those [(56.6±9.3); (123.1±15.0) min] in TT group (P<0.0001). However, there were no statistical significance in terms of the average incision lengths [(6.4±0.9) vs. (6.8±1.1) cm; P=0.1619], , the average intraoperative blood loss [(152.6±22.9) vs. (146.8±20.7) mL; P=0.3941], the average fracture healing times [(13.8±1.5) vs. (14.4±1.8) weeks; P=0.2350] and the average Harris hip score a year after operation [(84.4±6.6) vs. (82.7±7.2); P=0.4496] between the two groups. One patient in TT group experienced lower extremity intermuscular venous thrombosis postoperatively. No other operation-related complications were observed postoperatively nor during follow-up.ConclusionsMinimally invasive reduction with DRTR in unstable intertrochanteric fractures could effectively shorten the intraoperative reduction time and operation time in this study. Therefore, minimally invasive reduction with DRTR might be a good choice for intertrochanteric reduction of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Dataset Information

Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

Publications

Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets