Dataset Information

Non-intubated thoracoscopic bullectomy under sedation is safe and comfortable in the perioperative period.

ABSTRACT: Background:Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery can be performed under sedation using adjuvant regional anesthesia, however, the benefits of non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery under sedation have not yet been completely verified. In this study, we compare the perioperative safety and pain complaints of sedation without intubation in thoracoscopic bullectomy with that of conventional general anesthesia with double-lumen intubation and mechanical ventilation. Methods:Forty-one patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax who were scheduled for thoracoscopic bullectomy were enrolled in this study. Twenty-one patients were under sedation anesthesia (SA group) and 20 patients were under general anesthesia (GA group). In SA group, sedation was done with dexmedetomidine (a loading dose of 1 µg/kg for 10 min and then maintained in dosages of 0.3-1 µg/kg/h) and ketamine (2-4 mg/kg/h intraoperatively). Meanwhile, in GA group, induction with propofol and rocuronium, intubation with double lumen endotracheal tube and maintenance with 1.0-2.5% sevoflurane was done. In both groups, thoracoscopic bullectomy was performed in the same manner and all operations were conducted by single surgeon. Time for anesthesia [including emergence time and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time] and operation, postoperative pain, sore throat, hoarseness, adverse events (nausea, vomiting, hypotension and bradycardia), dose of rescue analgesic drug used for 24 hours post-operatively and perioperative arterial blood gas analysis were recorded. Results:The times for anesthesia, operation and emergence were significantly shorter in SA than GA. Incidence of sore throat were significantly lower in SA. The difference of other adverse events in the two groups was not significant. Conclusions:Our study demonstrated that compared to double-lumen intubation with general anesthesia, non-intubation with sedation for bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax was safe and efficient to reduce perioperative time.

SUBMITTER: Hwang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5906215 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Non-intubated thoracoscopic bullectomy under sedation is safe and comfortable in the perioperative period.

Hwang Jinwook J Shin Jae Seung JS Son Joo Hyung JH Min Too Jae TJ

Journal of thoracic disease 20180301 3

<h4>Background</h4>Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery can be performed under sedation using adjuvant regional anesthesia, however, the benefits of non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery under sedation have not yet been completely verified. In this study, we compare the perioperative safety and pain complaints of sedation without intubation in thoracoscopic bullectomy with that of conventional general anesthesia with double-lumen intubation and mechanical ventilation.<h4>Methods</h4>Forty-one patie ...[more]

PMID: 29707324

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNon-intubated anesthesia thoracoscopic surgery is an evolving form of minimally invasive thoracic surgery. It has had encouraging results in the treatment of lung cancer, and the current concept of enhanced recovery after surgery has become indispensable to surgical treatment. Our center retrospectively evaluated the clinical effect of rapid postoperative rehabilitation in patients who underwent thoracoscopic lung surgery under non-intubated anesthesia.MethodsThe clinical data of 192 patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 75 received double-lumen endotracheal intubation anesthesia, and 117 received a laryngeal mask instead of endotracheal intubated anesthesia. Comparing the intra-and post-operative indicators difference of these 2 groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, hemoglobin counts and platelet count 24 h after surgery between the non-intubated anesthesia and intubated anesthesia groups (P>0.05). In terms of the postoperative rehabilitation indicators of the VATS patients, the non-intubated anesthesia group had an earlier recovery in terms of water (food) intake, out-of-bed activity, and defecation (exhaust) times (P<0.001), less postoperative complications and adverse throat reactions (P<0.05), and higher levels of satisfaction (P<0.05) than the intubated anesthesia group. Compared to the intubated anesthesia group, the non-intubated anesthesia group had fewer changes of white blood cell counts, neutrophil percentages and lymphocytes percentages 24 h postoperatively (9.25×109 vs. 7.67×109, P=0.045; 7.06 vs. 5.53, P=0.039; 1.45 vs. 1.27, P=0.017), significant reduction pleural drainage after restoring oral intake in postoperative 24 and 48 h (198.43 vs. 131.07 and 114.04 vs. 57.47 mL, P<0.001), shorter postoperative thoracic tube drainage times (3.73 vs. 3.13 d, P<0.001). Notably, there was no difference between the smoking history and previous medical history of the patients in the 2 groups.ConclusionsCompared to intubation by general anesthesia, non-intubated thoracoscopic anesthesia is a safe and effective option. Patients who undergo non-intubated thoracoscopic lung surgery have a rapid recovery after surgery. Thus, it is worthy of promotion in clinical surgery settings.

Project description:ObjectiveNonintubated anesthesia, electromagnetic navigation (EMN)-guided preoperative localization, and uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are recent innovations in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of applying nonintubated anesthesia in a "one-stage" localization and resection workflow.MethodsPatients who underwent EMN-guided preoperative percutaneous localization with indocyanine green (ICG) and uniportal VATS were included. Perioperative data were compared between patients receiving nonintubated anesthesia and those receiving general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.ResultsForty-six patients with a total of 50 nodules were included in the study. Overall, finger palpation could be avoided in 94% of the nodules, whereas fluorescent green signals with a clear border on the pleural surface were noted in 91.3% (21 of 23) of nodules in the nonintubated group and 88.9% (24 of 27) of nodules in the intubated group. Intraoperatively, the nonintubated group had a lower median pH (7.33 [interquartile range (IQR), 7.28-7.40] vs 7.41 [IQR, 7.38-7.44]; P = .003), higher median arterial CO2 (45.5 [IQR, 41.1-58.7] mm Hg vs 38.4 [IQR, 35.3-40.6] mm Hg; P < .001), and lower arterial oxygen (322 [IQR, 211-433] mm Hg vs 426 [IQR, 355-471] mm Hg; P = .005) levels compared with the intubated group. The nonintubated group also had a shorter median registration time (2.0 [IQR, 1.0-3.0] minutes vs 3.0 [IQR, 2.0-8.0] minutes; P = .008) and total time in the operating room (150 [IQR, 130-175] minutes vs 170 [IQR, 135-203] minutes; P = .035), whereas no between-group differences were seen in localization and operative time. The duration of chest drainage, postoperative complications, pathologic diagnosis, and margins were similar in the 2 groups.ConclusionsNonintubated "one-stage" EMN-guided percutaneous ICG localization and uniportal VATS can be an option for selected patients undergoing treatment for small peripheral nodules.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Lung cancer is currently the leading malignant tumor in both domestic and foreign morbidity and mortality. Surgical treatment is the main treatment option for lung cancer. The aim of this study is to explore the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) combined with respiratory function exercise combined with single-hole thoracoscopic surgery on lung cancer patients with postoperative pulmonary complications, postoperative pain, time to get out of bed, time to extubation and length of hospital stay. METHODS:A total of 240 patients who underwent endoscopic lung cancer surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University and the Yancheng First People's Hospital from October 2017 to October 2019 were randomly divided into 4 groups, with 60 patients in each group. Patients in group A underwent single-hole thoracoscopic surgery, and preoperatively performed ERAS concept education and respiratory function training; group B used conventional 3-hole thoracoscopic surgery, and performed ERAS concept education and respiratory function training before operation; group C used conventional 3-hole thoracoscopic operation surgery, routine hospitalization education and nursing guidance, routine respiratory function training, no preoperative ERAS concept education; group D used single-hole thoracoscopic surgery, routine hospitalization education and nursing guidance, routine respiratory function training, no preoperative ERAS concept mission. The number of postoperative pulmonary complications, postoperative pain, time to get out of bed, extubation time, and hospital stay were recorded in the four groups. RESULTS:Compared with the groups B, C, and D, the incidence of pulmonary complications was significantly reduced, and the time to get out of bed, extubation time, and hospital stay were significantly shortened in group A. Compared with groups B, C, the postoperative pain was significantly reduced in group A. Compared with group C, the pulmonary complications were significantly reduced, and the time to get out of bed, extubation time and hospital stay were significantly shortened in group B. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between group A and group D, group B and group C (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS:For patients with single-hole thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, the ERAS concept guidance can effectively reduce the incidence of pulmonary complications and postoperative pain, shorten the time to get out of bed, the time to extubate, and the length of hospital stay.

Dataset Information

Non-intubated thoracoscopic bullectomy under sedation is safe and comfortable in the perioperative period.

Publications

Non-intubated thoracoscopic bullectomy under sedation is safe and comfortable in the perioperative period.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets