Dataset Information

Prognostic Impact of Statin Intensity in Heart Failure Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report From the CHART-2 (Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District 2) Study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The beneficial prognostic impact of statins has been established in patients with ischemic heart disease but not in those with heart failure (HF). In addition, it is still unclear whether patients benefit from statins regardless of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. METHODS AND RESULTS:We examined 2444 consecutive stage C or D HF patients with ischemic heart disease registered in CHART-2 (Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District 2), a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study in Japan. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the Japanese standard doses of statins and statin-intensity categories defined by the 2013 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines: higher (moderate-high)-intensity (n=868), lower (low)-intensity (n=526), and no statin (n=1050). The median follow-up period was 6.4 years (13929 person-years). Analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighted using a propensity score for multiple treatment revealed that both the higher-intesity group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68; P<0.001) and the lower-intensity group (HR: 0.82; P<0.001) had significantly lower incidence of the primary end point-a composite of all-cause death and HF admission-compared with the no statin group. The higher-intensity statin group had significantly lower incidence of the primary end point (HR: 0.82; P<0.001), all-cause death (HR: 0.83; P<0.001), and HF admission (HR: 0.78; P<0.001) than the lower-intensity statin group. Moreover, the use of statins, either higher- or lower-intensity, was associated with reduced incidence of the primary end point, regardless of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS:These results suggest that statin use, particularly the use of higher-intensity statins, has a beneficial prognostic impact in HF patients with ischemic heart disease, regardless of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00418041.

SUBMITTER: Oikawa T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5907545 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic Impact of Statin Intensity in Heart Failure Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report From the CHART-2 (Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District 2) Study.

Oikawa Takuya T Sakata Yasuhiko Y Nochioka Kotaro K Miura Masanobu M Tsuji Kanako K Onose Takeo T Abe Ruri R Kasahara Shintaro S Sato Masayuki M Shiroto Takashi T Takahashi Jun J Miyata Satoshi S Shimokawa Hiroaki H

Journal of the American Heart Association 20180314 6

<h4>Background</h4>The beneficial prognostic impact of statins has been established in patients with ischemic heart disease but not in those with heart failure (HF). In addition, it is still unclear whether patients benefit from statins regardless of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.<h4>Methods and results</h4>We examined 2444 consecutive stage C or D HF patients with ischemic heart disease registered in CHART-2 (Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District 2), a ...[more]

PMID: 29540427

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsPrognostic impacts of serum uric acid (UA) levels in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) remain inconclusive, especially for the whole range of serum UA levels.Methods and resultsIn the Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District-2 (CHART-2) study, we enrolled 4652 consecutive patients with CHF and classified them into four groups based on baseline serum UA levels by the Classification and Regression Tree: G1 (<3.8 mg/dL, N = 313), G2 (3.8-7.1 mg/dL, N = 3070), G3 (7.2-9.2 mg/dL, N = 1018), and G4 (>9.2 mg/dL, N = 251). Mean age was 71 ± 12, 69 ± 12, 68 ± 13, and 69 ± 15 years in G1, G2, G3, and G4, respectively (P < 0.001). During the median follow-up of 6.3 years, in G1, G2, G3, and G4, 111 (35%), 905 (29%), 370 (36%), and 139 (55%) patients died and 79 (25%), 729 (24%), 300 (29%), and 115 (46%) experienced heart failure hospitalization, respectively (both P < 0.001). G1 was characterized by a significantly high prevalence of women as compared with G2, G3, and G4 (59%, 32%, 24%, and 23%, respectively). Serum creatinine levels (0.8 ± 0.4, 0.9 ± 0.4, 1.2 ± 0.6, and 1.4 ± 0.8 mg/dL, respectively), prevalence of atrial fibrillation (34%, 39%, 45%, and 50%, respectively), and diuretics use (36%, 45%, 67%, and 89%, respectively) increased from G1, G2, G3 to G4 (all P < 0.001), while left ventricular ejection fraction decreased from G1, G2, G3 to G4 (59 ± 15, 58 ± 15, 54 ± 15, and 52 ± 17%, respectively, P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that, as compared with G2, both G1 and G4 had increased incidence of all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.67, P = 0.009; aHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.61, P = 0.037, respectively] and heart failure admission (aHR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.78, P = 0.008 and aHR 1.35, 95% CI, 1.06-1.71, P = 0.014, respectively). This U-shaped relationship was evident in the elderly patients. Furthermore, abnormal transitions to either higher or lower levels of serum UA from G2 were associated with increased mortality (aHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06-1.57, P = 0.012; aHR 1.57, 95% CI 1.12-2.20, P = 0.009).ConclusionsThese results demonstrate that serum UA levels have the U-shaped prognostic effects and abnormal transitions to either higher or lower levels are associated with poor prognosis in the elderly patients with CHF.

Project description:The prognostic values of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) have primarily been shown among patients with chronic heart failure (HF), with little representation of patients with acute HF (AHF). Therefore, we investigated the value of these echocardiographic parameters in predicting clinical outcomes among patients in the Korean Heart Failure (KorHF) Registry.The KorHF Registry consists of 3,200 patients who were hospitalized with AHF from 2005 to 2009. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival and readmission, and differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Predictors of survival were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.Echocardiograms from 2,910 of the 3,200 patients (90.9%) were evaluated. The median LVEF and LVEDD (37% and 56 mm, respectively) were used as cut-offs for the binary transformation of each parameter. The cumulative death-free survival rates for all patients did not significantly differ based on LVEF or LVEDD quartiles; however, an LVEF greater than the median was associated with a better prognosis in ischemic HF patients (log-rank test; p = 0.039). Among ischemic HF patients, LVEF (dichotomized) was a significant predictor of death in a Cox model after adjusting for a history of HF, age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), serum sodium, sex, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), atrial fibrillation (Af) and anemia (hazard ratio (HR) 1.475, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.099-1.979, p = 0.010). The cumulative readmission-free survival rates significantly differed among ischemic HF patients only when based on LVEDD quartiles (log-rank test; p = 0.001). In multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, LVEDD (dichotomized) remained a significant variable only among patients with ischemic HF after adjusting for sex, age, AMI, DM, COPD, serum sodium, SBP, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and anemia (HR 1.401, 95% CI 1.067-1.841, p = 0.015).Among ischemic AHF patients in the KorHF Registry, LVEF is associated with mortality, whereas LVEDD is only associated with readmission in a binary transformed form.

Project description:ImportanceAccurate prediction of risk of death or hospitalizations in patients with heart failure (HF) may allow physicians to explore how more accurate decisions regarding appropriateness and timing of disease-modifying treatments, advanced therapies, or the need for end-of-life care can be made.ObjectiveTo develop and validate a prognostic model for patients with HF.Design, setting, and participantsMultivariable analyses were performed in a stepwise fashion. Harrell C statistic was used to assess the discriminative ability. The derivation cohort was Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF) participants. The models were validated using the Aliskiren Trial to Minimize Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure Trial (ATMOSPHERE) study and in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF). A total of 8399 participants enrolled in PARADIGM-HF. Data were analyzed between June 2016 and June 2018.Main outcomes and measuresCardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization at both 1 and 2 years.ResultsComplete baseline clinical data were available for 8011 patients in PARADIGM-HF. The mean (SD) age of participants was 64 (11.4) years, 78.2% were men (n = 6567 of 8399), and 70.6% were New York Heart Association class II (n = 5919 of 8399). During a mean follow-up of 27 months, 1546 patients died, and 2031 had a cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. The common variables were: male sex, race/ethnicity (black or Asian), region (Central Europe or Latin America), HF duration of more than 5 years, New York Heart Association class III/ IV, left ventricular ejection fraction, diabetes mellitus, β-blocker use at baseline, and allocation to sacubitril/valsartan. Ranked by χ2, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide was the single most powerful independent predictor of each outcome. The C statistic at 1 and 2 years was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.71-0.76) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70-0.73) for the primary composite end point, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71-0.75) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.73) for cardiovascular death, and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.74) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.74) for all-cause death, respectively. When validated in ATMOSPHERE, the C statistic at 1 and 2 years was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68-0.71) for the primary composite end point, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.74) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72) for cardiovascular death, and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.74) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68-0.72) for all-cause death, respectively. An online calculator was created to allow calculation of an individual's risk (http://www.predict-hf.com).Conclusions and relevancePredictive models performed well and were developed and externally validated in large cohorts of geographically representative patients, comprehensively characterized with clinical and laboratory data including natriuretic peptides, who were receiving contemporary evidence-based treatment.

Dataset Information

Prognostic Impact of Statin Intensity in Heart Failure Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report From the CHART-2 (Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District 2) Study.

Publications

Prognostic Impact of Statin Intensity in Heart Failure Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report From the CHART-2 (Chronic Heart Failure Registry and Analysis in the Tohoku District 2) Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure