Dataset Information

Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Muscle fatigue induced by repetitive movements contributes to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Men and women respond differently to muscle fatigue during isometric single-joint efforts, but sex differences during dynamic multi-joint tasks have not been clearly identified. Moreover, most studies comparing men and women during fatigue development assessed endurance time. However, none evaluated sex differences in kinematic adaptations to fatigue during multi-joint dynamic tasks. The objective of the study was to compare how men and women adapt their upper body kinematics during a fatiguing repetitive pointing task. METHODS:Forty men and 41 women performed repetitive pointing movements (one per second) between two targets while maintaining their elbow elevated at shoulder height. The task ended when participants rated a perceived level of fatigue of 8/10. Trunk, humerothoracic, and elbow angles were compared between the first and last 30 s of the experiment and between men and women. Linear positions of the index finger (distance from the target) and the elbow (arm elevation) as well as movement timing were documented as task performance measures. RESULTS:Men (7.4?±?3.2 min) and women (8.3?±?4.5 min) performed the repetitive pointing task for a similar duration. For both sex groups, trunk range of motion increased with fatigue while shoulder's and elbow's decreased. Moreover, participants modified their trunk posture to compensate for the decreased humerothoracic elevation. Movements at all joints also became more variable with fatigue. However, of the 24 joint angle variables assessed, only two Sex × Fatigue interactions were observed. Although average humerothoracic elevation angle decreased in both subgroups, this decrease was greater in men (standardized response mean [SRM] -?1.63) than in women (SRM -?1.44). Moreover, the movement-to-movement variability of humerothoracic elevation angle increased only in women (SRM 0.42). CONCLUSION:Despite many similarities between men's and women's response to fatigue induced by repetitive pointing movements, some sex differences were observed. Those subtle differences may indicate that men's shoulder muscles were more fatigued than women's despite a similar level of perceived exertion. They may also indicate that men and women do not adapt the exact same way to a similar fatigue.

SUBMITTER: Bouffard J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5907702 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements.

Bouffard Jason J Yang Chen C Begon Mickael M Côté Julie J

Biology of sex differences 20180419 1

<h4>Background</h4>Muscle fatigue induced by repetitive movements contributes to the development of musculoskeletal disorders. Men and women respond differently to muscle fatigue during isometric single-joint efforts, but sex differences during dynamic multi-joint tasks have not been clearly identified. Moreover, most studies comparing men and women during fatigue development assessed endurance time. However, none evaluated sex differences in kinematic adaptations to fatigue during multi-joint d ...[more]

PMID: 29673397

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundUpper limb kinematic assessments provide quantifiable information on qualitative movement behavior and limitations after stroke. A comprehensive characterization of spatiotemporal kinematics of stroke subjects during upper limb daily living activities is lacking. Herein, kinematic expressions were investigated with respect to different movement types and impairment levels for the entire task as well as for motion subphases.MethodChronic stroke subjects with upper limb movement impairments and healthy subjects performed a set of daily living activities including gesture and grasp movements. Kinematic measures of trunk displacement, shoulder flexion/extension, shoulder abduction/adduction, elbow flexion/extension, forearm pronation/supination, wrist flexion/extension, movement time, hand peak velocity, number of velocity peaks (NVP), and spectral arc length (SPARC) were extracted for the whole movement as well as the subphases of reaching distally and proximally. The effects of the factors gesture versus grasp movements, and the impairment level on the kinematics of the whole task were tested. Similarities considering the metrics expressions and relations were investigated for the subphases of reaching proximally and distally between tasks and subgroups.ResultsData of 26 stroke and 5 healthy subjects were included. Gesture and grasp movements were differently expressed across subjects. Gestures were performed with larger shoulder motions besides higher peak velocity. Grasp movements were expressed by larger trunk, forearm, and wrist motions. Trunk displacement, movement time, and NVP increased and shoulder flexion/extension decreased significantly with increased impairment level. Across tasks, phases of reaching distally were comparable in terms of trunk displacement, shoulder motions and peak velocity, while reaching proximally showed comparable expressions in trunk motions. Consistent metric relations during reaching distally were found between shoulder flexion/extension, elbow flexion/extension, peak velocity, and between movement time, NVP, and SPARC. Reaching proximally revealed reproducible correlations between forearm pronation/supination and wrist flexion/extension, movement time and NVP.ConclusionSpatiotemporal differences between gestures versus grasp movements and between different impairment levels were confirmed. The consistencies of metric expressions during movement subphases across tasks can be useful for linking kinematic assessment standards and daily living measures in future research and performing task and study comparisons.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03135093. Registered 26 April 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03135093 .

Project description:A proper movement categorization reduces the complexity of understanding or reproducing human movements in fields such as physiology, rehabilitation, and robotics, through partitioning a wide variety of human movements into representative sub-motion groups. However, how to establish a categorization (especially a quantitative categorization) for various human lower limb movements is rarely investigated in literature and remains challenging due to the diversity and complexity of the lower limb movements (diverse gait modes and interaction styles with the environment). Here we present a quantitative categorization for the various lower limb movements. To this end, a similarity measure between movements was first built based on limb kinematic synergies that provide a unified and physiologically meaningful framework for evaluating the similarities among different types of movements. Then, a categorization was established via hierarchical cluster analysis for thirty-four lower limb movements, including walking, running, hopping, sitting-down-standing-up, and turning in different environmental conditions. According to the movement similarities, the various movements could be divided into three distinct clusters (cluster 1: walking, running, and sitting-down-standing-up; cluster 2: hopping; cluster 3: turning). In each cluster, cluster-specific movement synergies were required. Besides the uniqueness of each cluster, similarities were also found among part of the synergies employed by these different clusters, perhaps related to common behavioral goals in these clusters. The mix of synergies shared across the clusters and synergies for specific clusters thus suggests the coexistence of the conservation and augmentation of the kinematic synergies underlying the construction of the diverse and complex motor behaviors. Overall, the categorization presented here yields a quantitative and hierarchical representation of the various lower limb movements, which can serve as a basis for the understanding of the formation mechanisms of human locomotion and motor function assessment and reproduction in related fields.

Dataset Information

Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements.

Publications

Sex differences in kinematic adaptations to muscle fatigue induced by repetitive upper limb movements.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets