Dataset Information

Early and sustained efficacy with apremilast monotherapy in biological-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis: a phase IIIB, randomised controlled trial (ACTIVE).

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:Evaluate apremilast efficacy across various psoriatic arthritis (PsA) manifestations beginning at week 2 in biological-naïve patients with PsA. METHODS:Patients were randomised (1:1) to apremilast 30?mg twice daily or placebo. At week 16, patients whose swollen and tender joint counts had not improved by ?10% were eligible for early escape. At week 24, all patients received apremilast through week 52. RESULTS:Among 219 randomised patients (apremilast: n=110; placebo: n=109), a significantly greater American College of Rheumatology 20 response at week 16 (primary outcome) was observed with apremilast versus placebo (38.2% (42/110) vs 20.2% (22/109); P=0.004); response rates at week 2 (first assessment) were 16.4% (18/110) versus 6.4% (7/109) (P=0.025). Improvements in other efficacy outcomes, including 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS-28) using C reactive protein (CRP), swollen joint count, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), enthesitis and morning stiffness severity, were observed with apremilast at week 2. At week 16, apremilast significantly reduced PsA disease activity versus placebo, with changes in DAS-28 (CRP) (P<0.0001), HAQ-DI (P=0.023) and Gladman Enthesitis Index (P=0.001). Improvements were maintained with continued treatment through week 52. Over 52 weeks, apremilast's safety profile was consistent with prior phase 3 studies in psoriasis and PsA. During weeks 0-24, the incidence of protocol-defined diarrhoea was 11.0% (apremilast) and 8.3% (placebo); serious adverse event rates were 2.8% (apremilast) and 4.6% (placebo). CONCLUSIONS:In biological-naïve patients with PsA, onset of effect with apremilast was observed at week 2 and continued through week 52. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT01925768; Results.

SUBMITTER: Nash P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5909747 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Early and sustained efficacy with apremilast monotherapy in biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: a phase IIIB, randomised controlled trial (ACTIVE).

Nash Peter P Ohson Kamal K Walsh Jessica J Delev Nikolay N Nguyen Dianne D Teng Lichen L Gómez-Reino Juan J JJ Aelion Jacob A JA

Annals of the rheumatic diseases 20180117 5

<h4>Objective</h4>Evaluate apremilast efficacy across various psoriatic arthritis (PsA) manifestations beginning at week 2 in biological-naïve patients with PsA.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients were randomised (1:1) to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo. At week 16, patients whose swollen and tender joint counts had not improved by ≥10% were eligible for early escape. At week 24, all patients received apremilast through week 52.<h4>Results</h4>Among 219 randomised patients (apremilast: n=110; place ...[more]

PMID: 29343507

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a spondyloarthritis that occurs in up to 30% of psoriasis patients. Patients with PsA are at risk for decreased quality of life due to both joint and skin symptoms, impaired physical function and disease progression. Treatments include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, conventional systemic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate, and biologic agents, including tumor necrosis factor-? inhibitors. The most recently introduced treatment option is apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor.MethodsThis review provides an in-depth discussion of apremilast's mechanism of action, and evidence of its clinical efficacy and safety from the Psoriatic Arthritis Long-term Assessment of Clinical Efficacy (PALACE) phase III pivotal clinical trials (PALACE 1, 2, and 3).ResultsThese trials demonstrate that apremilast is effective for the treatment of active PsA, despite prior conventional DMARDs or biologic treatment. The primary efficacy end point, a 20% improvement from baseline in modified American College of Rheumatology response criteria at Week 16, was achieved by significantly greater proportions of patients treated with apremilast 20 mg twice daily (BID) and apremilast 30 mg BID versus placebo in PALACE 1, 2, and 3. Improvements in this and other clinical and patient-reported end points, including swollen and tender joint counts, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score, physical function, and quality of life, were maintained, extending over 52 weeks of treatment among patients initially randomized to apremilast. Apremilast's safety profile has been acceptable, with diarrhea and nausea being the most common adverse events, with no evidence for an increased risk of infection or need for laboratory monitoring. The PALACE pivotal data indicate that apremilast presents a new option for the treatment of PsA that may be appropriate for use early in the treatment ladder. Ongoing PALACE open-label extension trials of up to 4 years will characterize the long-term clinical effects and safety of apremilast therapy.FundingCelgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA.

Project description:ObjectiveTo study cost-effectiveness of an interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor secukinumab, with other biologics and apremilast in patients with Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from payer perspective in Finland.MethodsIn this semi-Markov model, subcutaneous (SC) secukinumab was compared with SC treatments etanercept and its biosimilar, certolizumab pegol, adalimumab and its biosimilar, golimumab, ustekinumab, intravenous (IV) treatment infliximab, as well as oral non-biologic apremilast. Patients without prior exposure (naïve) to biologics and without moderate to severe psoriasis were considered for secukinumab 150 mg group. Secukinumab 300 mg group included naïve patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and all patients with prior biologic exposure. The PsA Response Criteria (PsARC) at 12-week was primary criteria for treatment response. Other clinical as well as cost related model inputs were derived from relevant clinical trials as well as Finnish publications. The key model outcomes were quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. An annual 3% discount rate was applied to all future costs and benefits. Model input variations were assessed through sensitivity analyses and alternative scenario analyses.ResultsFor a lifetime horizon (60 years), secukinumab 150 mg dominated all branded SC biologics and apremilast with highest QALY of 8.01 and lowest lifetime cost of €187,776, while it was cost-effective against IV infliximab among biologic-naïve patients without moderate to severe psoriasis. Secukinumab 300 mg was cost-effective against all branded SC biologics and apremilast and dominated IV infliximab among biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, while it was cost-effective in biologic experienced patients. With the one-way sensitivity analysis, PsARC response, drug acquisition cost, and health assessment questionnaire score were the most important parameters affecting the outcomes. Across all treatment groups, patients on secukinumab were most likely to achieve highest net monetary benefit than other competitors in probabilistic sensitivity analysis. With alternative scenario analysis, results largely remained unchanged.ConclusionsSecukinumab is a cost-effective treatment for PsA patients from a Finnish payer's perspective.

Project description:ObjectiveEvaluation of the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-23p19 subunit, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) through 1 year.MethodsAdults who met ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis, with active disease (≥3 swollen and ≥3 tender joints; C reactive protein ≥0.3 mg/dL) despite standard treatment (31% previously received ≤2 tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi)), were randomised (1:1:1) to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at Week0, Week4, then Q8W; or placebo with cross-over to guselkumab 100 mg Q4W at Week24 (PBO→Q4W) through Week48. Clinical efficacy through Week52 (employing non-responder imputation) and adverse events (AEs) through Week60 were evaluated.ResultsOf 381 treated patients, 90% completed the study. Numerical increases in the proportions of patients achieving ≥20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20) were observed post-Week24, reaching 73% (94/128) and 60% (76/127) for Q4W-randomised and Q8W-randomised patients, respectively, by Week52. Proportions of patients achieving ACR50/ACR70/skin responses and minimal/very low disease activity were maintained, as were improvements in physical function and health-related quality of life, through Week52 in guselkumab-randomised patients. Response to guselkumab was maintained in both TNFi-naïve and TNFi-experienced patients. Serious AEs and serious infections occurred in similar proportions of guselkumab Q4W-randomised (3% and 0%) and Q8W-randomised (6% and 2%) patients through Week60, with no new safety concerns versus observations through Week24. No guselkumab-treated patient and two patients receiving placebo died; no study participant developed opportunistic infection or inflammatory bowel disease.ConclusionGuselkumab provided sustained improvement across multiple clinical manifestations of PsA, maintaining a favourable benefit-risk profile, through 1 year regardless of prior TNFi exposure.

Dataset Information

Early and sustained efficacy with apremilast monotherapy in biological-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis: a phase IIIB, randomised controlled trial (ACTIVE).

Publications

Early and sustained efficacy with apremilast monotherapy in biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: a phase IIIB, randomised controlled trial (ACTIVE).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure