Dataset Information

Population-based differences in the outcome and presentation of lung cancer patients based upon racial, histologic, and economic factors in all lung patients and those with metastatic disease.

ABSTRACT: To investigate the interrelation between economic, marital, and known histopathologic/therapeutic prognostic factors in presentation and survival of patients with lung cancer in nine different ethnic groups. A retrospective review of the SEER database was conducted through the years 2007-2012. Population differences were assessed via chi-square testing. Multivariable analyses (MVA) were used to detect overall survival (OS) differences in the total population (TP, N = 153,027) and for those patients presenting with Stage IV (N = 70,968). Compared to Whites, Blacks were more likely to present with younger age, male sex, lower income, no insurance, single/widowed partnership, less squamous cell carcinomas, and advanced stage; and experience less definitive surgery, lower OS, and lung cancer-specific (LCSS) survival. White Hispanics presented with younger age, higher income, lower rates of insurance, single/widowed partnership status, advanced stage, more adenocarcinomas, and lower rates of definitive surgery, but no difference in OS and LCSS than Whites. In the TP and Stage IV populations, MVAs revealed that OS was better or equivalent to Whites for all other ethnic groups and was positively associated with insurance, marriage, and higher income. Blacks presented with more advanced disease and were more likely to succumb to lung cancer, but when adjusted for prognostic factors, they had a better OS in the TP compared to Whites. Disparities in income, marital status, and insurance rather than race affect OS of patients with lung cancer. Because of their presentation with advanced disease, Black and Hispanics are likely to have increased benefit from lung cancer screening.

SUBMITTER: Varlotto JM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5911616 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Population-based differences in the outcome and presentation of lung cancer patients based upon racial, histologic, and economic factors in all lung patients and those with metastatic disease.

Varlotto John Michael JM Voland Richard R McKie Kerrie K Flickinger John C JC DeCamp Malcolm M MM Maddox Debra D Rava Paul P Fitzgerald Thomas J TJ Graeber Geoffrey G Rassaei Negar N Oliveira Paulo P Ali Suhail S Belani Chandra C Glanzman Jonathan J Wakelee Heather A HA Patel Manali M Baima Jennifer J Zhang Jianying J Walsh William W

Cancer medicine 20180313 4

To investigate the interrelation between economic, marital, and known histopathologic/therapeutic prognostic factors in presentation and survival of patients with lung cancer in nine different ethnic groups. A retrospective review of the SEER database was conducted through the years 2007-2012. Population differences were assessed via chi-square testing. Multivariable analyses (MVA) were used to detect overall survival (OS) differences in the total population (TP, N = 153,027) and for those patie ...[more]

PMID: 29533006

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAppendiceal cancer incidence among individuals age < 50 years (early-onset appendiceal cancer) is rising with unknown etiologies. Distinct clinicopathologic/demographic features of early-onset appendiceal cancer remain unexplored. We compared patterns of appendiceal cancer among individuals by age of disease-onset.MethodsUsing the NIH/NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program data, we identified individuals age 20+ years diagnosed with appendiceal cancer from 2007 to 2016. Cochran-Armitage trend tests and multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine age-related differences in clinicopathologic/demographic features of appendiceal cancer.ResultsWe identified 8,851 patients with appendiceal cancer during the 10-year study period. Histologic subtype, tumor grade, stage, sex and race/ethnicity all significantly differed by age of appendiceal cancer diagnosis. After adjustment for race/ethnicity, sex, stage, insurance status, and tumor grade, young patients were 82% more likely to be Hispanic [OR, 1.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.48-2.25; P < 0.001] and 4-fold more likely to be American Indian or Alaska Native (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.77-9.16; P = 0.0009) compared with late-onset cases. Patients with early-onset appendiceal cancer were also 2- to 3.5-fold more likely to be diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors of the appendix (goblet cell carcinoid: OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.59-2.41; P < 0.0001; carcinoid: OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 2.80-4.42; P < 0.0001) compared with patients with late-onset appendiceal cancer. Among patients with neuroendocrine tumors, early-onset cases were also 45% to 61% less likely to present with high-grade (III-IV) tumors.ConclusionsApproximately one in every three patients with appendiceal cancer is diagnosed before age 50 years in the United States. Appendiceal cancer in young patients is classified by distinct histologic and demographic features.ImpactEarly-onset appendiceal cancer determinants can inform discovery of risk factors and molecular biomarkers of appendiceal cancer in young patients, with implications for appendiceal cancer prevention, detection, and treatment.

Project description:Infection with the hepatitis E virus (HEV) is one of the main causes of acute hepatitis worldwide. Given that, the histopathology of hepatitis E is relatively poorly characterized, and it is unclear what exactly determines its remarkable variability. The aim of our study was a systematic analysis of hepatitis E histology, especially with regard to the clinical setting. Fifty-two liver samples (48 biopsies, 1 liver explant, 3 autopsy livers) from 41 patients with molecularly proven hepatitis E (28 HEV genotype (gt) 3, three gt 1, one gt 4 and 9 undetermined gt) were systematically evaluated for 33 histopathologic features. Following one approach, the biopsies were assigned to one of five generic histologic patterns. In another approach, they were subjected to hierarchical clustering. We found that 23/41 (56%) patients were immunocompromised, whereas 18 (44%) had no known immunosuppression. Five patients (12%) had pre-existing liver disease (LD). The histopathologic spectrum ranged from almost normal to acute, chronic, and steato-hepatitis to subtotal necrosis, and was thus distributed across all five generic patterns. Hierarchical clustering, however, identified three histopathologic clusters (C1-C3), which segregated along the immune status and pre-existing LD: C1 comprised mostly patients with pre-existing LD; histology mainly reflected the respective LD without pointing to the additional hepatitis E. C2 comprised mostly immunocompetent patients; histology mainly displayed florid hepatitis. C3 comprised mostly immunocompromised patients; histology mainly displayed smoldering hepatitis. Accordingly, C1-C3 differed markedly with respect to their clinical and histopathologic differential diagnoses. Hierarchical clustering suggests three groups with distinct histopathologies, indicating biologically different manifestations of hepatitis E. The association of histopathologic changes with the patient's immune status and pre-existing LD plausibly explains the diversity of hepatitis E histopathology, and suggests that these factors are the crucial underlying determinants. We expect our results to improve patient management by guiding the clinico-pathologic diagnosis of hepatitis E.

Project description:BackgroundHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with a worse prognosis. Little is known about the relationship between histology and prognosis among different distant metastasis sites (DMS). Our aims were to explore the prognostic value of histologic subtypes in different DMS and screen out specific subtypes with particular DMS that need more attention in HER2+ MBC.MethodsHER2+ MBC patient data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2014. Chi-squared tests were utilized to compare histologic subtypes in four DMS. The logistic regression analyses were used to control confounding factors. The log-rank tests were used to analyze the correlation of histologic subtype with disease-specific survival and overall survival. The survival data was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.ResultsA total of 1174 HER2+ MBC patients were involved. First, the distribution of histological subtypes varied across metastatic sites, and the proportions of metastatic sites in different histological subtypes were also different. Furthermore, different histological subtypes within specific DMS showed divergent prognoses, and the different outcomes were shown by distinct DMS for specific histological subtypes. Among them, lobular carcinoma (ILC) subtypes showed the worst prognosis in bone metastasis, and lung metastasis predicted the worst prognosis in infiltration duct and lobular carcinoma (IDC-ILC) subtypes. After further consideration of hormone receptor (HR) status, the IDC-ILC subtype with liver metastasis in HR+/HER2+ MBC patients and the ILC subtype with bone metastasis in HR-/HER2+ MBC patients proved to be noteworthy.ConclusionsHistological subtypes are involved in determining the heterogeneity of HER2+ MBC patient prognosis, which is helpful to guide the prognosis prediction and monitoring of HER2+ breast cancer patients in clinics.

Dataset Information

Population-based differences in the outcome and presentation of lung cancer patients based upon racial, histologic, and economic factors in all lung patients and those with metastatic disease.

Publications

Population-based differences in the outcome and presentation of lung cancer patients based upon racial, histologic, and economic factors in all lung patients and those with metastatic disease.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets