Dataset Information

Neuroblastoma: clinical and biological approach to risk stratification and treatment.

ABSTRACT: Neuroblastoma is the most common extra-cranial solid tumor of childhood and the most common in the first year of life. It is a unique malignancy in that infants often present with either localized or metastatic disease that can spontaneously regress without intervention while older children can succumb to the disease after months to years of arduous therapy. Given this wide range of outcomes, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group was created to stratify patients based on presenting characteristics and tumor biology in order to guide intensity of treatment strategies. The goal has been to decrease therapy for low-risk patients to avoid long-term complications while augmenting and targeting therapies for high-risk patients to improve overall survival. The international risk stratification depends on age, stage, histology, MYCN gene amplification status, tumor cell ploidy and segmental chromosomal abnormalities. Treatment for asymptomatic low-risk patients with an estimated survival of >?98% is often observation or surgical resection alone, whereas intermediate-risk patients with an estimated survival of >?90% require moderate doses of response-adjusted chemotherapy along with resection. High-risk patients undergo multiple cycles of combination chemotherapy before surgery, followed by consolidation with myeloablative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and local radiation and finally immunotherapy with differentiation therapy as maintenance phase. With this approach, outcome for patients with neuroblastoma has improved, as the field continues to expand efforts in more targeted therapies for high-risk patients.

SUBMITTER: Tolbert VP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5918153 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Neuroblastoma: clinical and biological approach to risk stratification and treatment.

Tolbert Vanessa P VP Matthay Katherine K KK

Cell and tissue research 20180323 2

Neuroblastoma is the most common extra-cranial solid tumor of childhood and the most common in the first year of life. It is a unique malignancy in that infants often present with either localized or metastatic disease that can spontaneously regress without intervention while older children can succumb to the disease after months to years of arduous therapy. Given this wide range of outcomes, the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group was created to stratify patients based on presenting characte ...[more]

PMID: 29572647

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose The substratification of high-risk neuroblastoma is challenging, and new predictive imaging biomarkers are warranted for better patient selection. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic role of PET-based intratumor heterogeneity and its potential ability to improve risk stratification in neuroblastoma. Methods Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT scans from 112 consecutive children with newly diagnosed neuroblastoma were retrospectively analyzed. The primary tumor was segmented in the PET images. SUVs, volumetric parameters including metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and texture features were extracted. After the exclusion of imaging features with poor and moderate reproducibility, the relationships between the imaging indices and clinicopathological factors, as well as event-free survival (EFS), were assessed. Results The median follow-up duration was 33 months. Multivariate analysis showed that PET-based intratumor heterogeneity outperformed clinicopathological features, including age, stage, and MYCN, and remained the most robust independent predictor for EFS [training set, hazard ratio (HR): 6.4, 95% CI: 3.1–13.2, p < 0.001; test set, HR: 5.0, 95% CI: 1.8–13.6, p = 0.002]. Within the clinical high-risk group, patients with a high metabolic heterogeneity showed significantly poorer outcomes (HR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.6–6.8, p = 0.002 in the training set; HR: 4.4, 95% CI: 1.5–12.9, p = 0.008 in the test set) compared to those with relatively homogeneous tumors. Furthermore, intratumor heterogeneity outran the volumetric indices (MTVs and TLGs) and yielded the best performance of distinguishing high-risk patients with different outcomes with a 3-year EFS of 6% vs. 47% (p = 0.001) in the training set and 9% vs. 51% (p = 0.004) in the test set. Conclusion PET-based intratumor heterogeneity was a strong independent prognostic factor in neuroblastoma. In the clinical high-risk group, intratumor heterogeneity further stratified patients with distinct outcomes.

Project description:Rationale: No evidence-based tools exist to enhance precision in the selection of patient-specific optimal treatment durations to study in tuberculosis clinical trials. Objectives: To develop risk stratification tools that assign patients with tuberculosis into risk groups of unfavorable outcome and inform selection of optimal treatment duration for each patient strata to study in clinical trials. Methods: Publicly available data from four phase 3 trials, each evaluating treatment duration shortening from 6 to 4 months, were used to develop parametric time-to-event models that describe unfavorable outcomes. Regimen, baseline, and on-treatment characteristics were evaluated as predictors of outcomes. Exact regression coefficients of predictors were used to assign risk groups and predict optimal treatment durations. Measurements and Main Results: The parametric model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72. A six-item risk score (HIV status, smear grade, sex, cavitary disease status, body mass index, and Month 2 culture status) successfully grouped participants into low (1,060/3,791; 28%), moderate (1,740/3,791; 46%), and high (991/3,791; 26%) risk, requiring treatment durations of 4, 6, and greater than 6 months, respectively, to reach a target cure rate of 93% when receiving standard-dose rifamycin-containing regimens. With current one-duration-fits-all approaches, high-risk groups have a 3.7-fold (95% confidence interval, 2.7-5.1) and 2.4-fold (1.9-2.9) higher hazard risk of unfavorable outcomes compared with low- and moderate-risk groups, respectively. Four-month regimens were noninferior to the standard 6-month regimen in the low-risk group. Conclusions: Our model discrimination was modest but consistent with current models of unfavorable outcomes. Our results showed that stratified medicine approaches are feasible and may achieve high cure rates in all patients with tuberculosis. An interactive risk stratification tool is provided to facilitate decision-making in the regimen development pathway.

Dataset Information

Neuroblastoma: clinical and biological approach to risk stratification and treatment.

Publications

Neuroblastoma: clinical and biological approach to risk stratification and treatment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets