Dataset Information

Biases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate on a large scale, across 272 common types of laboratory tests, the impact of healthcare processes on the predictive value of electronic health record (EHR) data.

Design

Retrospective observational study.

Setting

Two large hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts, with inpatient, emergency, and ambulatory care.

Participants

All 669?452 patients treated at the two hospitals over one year between 2005 and 2006.

Main outcome measures

The relative predictive accuracy of each laboratory test for three year survival, using the time of the day, day of the week, and ordering frequency of the test, compared to the value of the test result.

Results

The presence of a laboratory test order, regardless of any other information about the test result, has a significant association (P<0.001) with the odds of survival in 233 of 272 (86%) tests. Data about the timing of when laboratory tests were ordered were more accurate than the test results in predicting survival in 118 of 174 tests (68%).

Conclusions

Healthcare processes must be addressed and accounted for in analysis of observational health data. Without careful consideration to context, EHR data are unsuitable for many research questions. However, if explicitly modeled, the same processes that make EHR data complex can be leveraged to gain insight into patients' state of health.

SUBMITTER: Agniel D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5925441 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Biases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study.

Agniel Denis D Kohane Isaac S IS Weber Griffin M GM

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 20180430

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate on a large scale, across 272 common types of laboratory tests, the impact of healthcare processes on the predictive value of electronic health record (EHR) data.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective observational study.<h4>Setting</h4>Two large hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts, with inpatient, emergency, and ambulatory care.<h4>Participants</h4>All 669 452 patients treated at the two hospitals over one year between 2005 and 2006.<h4>Main outcome measures</h4>The relative p ...[more]

PMID: 29712648

Similar Datasets

Project description: To assess the short term association of inpatient implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) with patient outcomes of mortality, readmissions, and adverse safety events. Observational study with difference-in-differences analysis. Medicare, 2011-12. Patients admitted to 17 study hospitals with a verifiable "go live" date for implementation of inpatient EHRs during 2011-12, and 399 control hospitals in the same hospital referral region. All cause readmission within 30 days of discharge, all cause mortality within 30 days of admission, and adverse safety events as defined by the patient safety for selected indicators (PSI)-90 composite measure among Medicare beneficiaries admitted to one of these hospitals 90 days before and 90 days after implementation of the EHRs (n=28?235 and 26?453 admissions), compared with the control group of all contemporaneous admissions to hospitals in the same hospital referral region (n=284?632 and 276?513 admissions). Analyses were adjusted for beneficiaries' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Before and after implementation, characteristics of admissions were similar in both study and control hospitals. Among study hospitals, unadjusted 30 day mortality (6.74% to 7.15%, P=0.06) and adverse safety event rates (10.5 to 11.4 events per 1000 admissions, P=0.34) did not significantly change after implementation of EHRs. There was an unadjusted decrease in 30 day readmission rates, from 19.9% to 19.0% post-implementation (P=0.02). In difference-in-differences analysis, however, there was no significant change in any outcome between pre-implementation and post-implementation periods (all P?0.13). Despite concerns that implementation of EHRs might adversely impact patient care during the acute transition period, we found no overall negative association of such implementation on short term inpatient mortality, adverse safety events, or readmissions in the Medicare population across 17 US hospitals.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:The use of electronic medical record (EMR) data is necessary to improve clinical research efficiency. However, it is not easy to identify patients who meet research eligibility criteria and collect the necessary information from EMRs because the data collection process must integrate various techniques, including the development of a data warehouse and translation of eligibility criteria into computable criteria. This research aimed to demonstrate an electronic medical records retrieval system (ERS) and an example of a hospital-based cohort study that identified both patients and exposure with an ERS. We also evaluated the feasibility and usefulness of the method. DESIGN:The system was developed and evaluated. PARTICIPANTS:In total, 800 000 cases of clinical information stored in EMRs at our hospital were used. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES:The feasibility and usefulness of the ERS, the method to convert text from eligible criteria to computable criteria, and a confirmation method to increase research data accuracy. RESULTS:To comprehensively and efficiently collect information from patients participating in clinical research, we developed an ERS. To create the ERS database, we designed a multidimensional data model optimised for patient identification. We also devised practical methods to translate narrative eligibility criteria into computable parameters. We applied the system to an actual hospital-based cohort study performed at our hospital and converted the test results into computable criteria. Based on this information, we identified eligible patients and extracted data necessary for confirmation by our investigators and for statistical analyses with our ERS. CONCLUSIONS:We propose a pragmatic methodology to identify patients from EMRs who meet clinical research eligibility criteria. Our ERS allowed for the efficient collection of information on the eligibility of a given patient, reduced the labour required from the investigators and improved the reliability of the results.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The rapid implementation of patient portals, through which patients can view their electronic health record, creates possibilities for information exchange and communication between patients and health care professionals. However, real-time disclosure of test results and clinical reports poses a source of concern. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to examine negative experiences resulting from real-time disclosure of medical information through a patient portal. METHODS:Data were collected over a 2-year period in 4 datasets consisting of incidents reported by health care professionals, complaints of patients, patient issues at a portal helpdesk, and a survey among health care professionals. Incidents, complaints, issues, and answers on the survey were counted and analyzed through an iterative process of coding. RESULTS:Within the chosen time frame of 2 years, on average, 7978 patients per month logged into the portal at least once. The amount of negative incidents and complaints was limited. A total of 6 incidents, 4 complaints, and 2506 issues at the helpdesk concerning the patient portal were reported, of which only 2, 1, and 3 cases of these respective databases concerned real-time disclosure of medical information through the patient portal. Moreover, 32 out of 216 health care professionals reported patients that had negative experiences with real-time disclosure. Most negative consequences concerned confused and anxious patients when confronted with unexpected or incomprehensible results. CONCLUSIONS:Real-time access through a patient portal did not substantially result in negative consequences. The negative consequences that did occur can be mitigated by adequate preparation and instruction of patients concerning the various functionalities of the patient portal, real-time disclosure of test results in particular, and can also be managed through educating health care professionals about the patient portal and making adjustments in the daily practice of health care professionals.

Project description:Background:Globally, electronic information and communication technology has been applied and much expanded in the healthcare industry. However, in developing counties including Ethiopia, EMR system adoption and utilization for medical practice are still inconsistent, and healthcare institutions which started utilization currently have also failed to sustain. A desirable readiness of healthcare experts is mandatory to expand digital health service delivery. Thus, this study is aimed at estimating the proportion of the willingness of professionals in Bahir Dar city to use EMR and at identifying factors associated with this proportion. Methods:An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from September 1 to October 30, 2019, among 634 health professionals. Respondents were selected using a simple random sampling method. Data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 23 for further analysis. Descriptive statistics were computed to describe study variables and presented using tables. Willingness to use the EMR system was computed. Bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression models were fitted to identify the associated factors. The odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was used to measure the strength of association. Results:A total of 616 health professionals participated in the study with a response rate of 97%. The proportion of willingness to use the EMR system was 85.9%. Among health professionals who were not willing to use EMR, lack of access to EMR training (73.4%) was a major barrier to the willingness to use EMR. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that those health professionals who had good computer skill (AOR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3-4.6), good knowledge on EMR (AOR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1-4.4), gotten EMR training (AOR = 3.8; 95% CI: 1.7-8.1), EMR guideline access (AOR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.4-5.6), and management support (AOR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.4-4.8) were more likely willing to use the EMR system. Conclusions:Majority of the professionals were willing to use the EMR system. EMR program should involve computer illiterate, less knowledgeable, those unable to access EMR guidelines, and managerially unsupported professionals. Enhancing health professionals' attitude and contextualizing EMR training in the healthcare curricula are highly recommended to scale up EMR use.

Dataset Information

Biases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study.

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Main outcome measures

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Biases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure