Dataset Information

Systemic and Adjuvant Therapies for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma represents the second most common primary liver cancer and is increasing in incidence. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced, nonsurgical stage and only about 1 in 5 cases are surgically resectable. Despite surgery, the 5-year survival is low at only 30%. Multifocal, node- or margin-positive disease is at a higher risk of recurrence after resection. There is no level 1 evidence in support of postoperative adjuvant therapy. A recent adjuvant therapy phase III trial from the Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive-Actions Concertées dans les Cancers Colo-Rectaux et Digestifs (PRODIGE) group reported no survival advantage with adjuvant gemcitabine and oxaliplatin therapy. Locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma is treated with gemcitabine-based systemic chemotherapy with suboptimal response and survival. Integration of local therapy such as focal radiation along with induction chemotherapy is now being investigated in multicenter clinical trials. Recent molecular profiling studies have indicated that about 30% to 40% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cases have actionable mutations. These include fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), isocitrate dehyrogenase 1 (IDH1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and BRAF genetic aberrations. Clinical trials targeting these mutations as well as immune therapy using programmed cell death 1 (PD1) inhibitors indicated a promising early signal showing clinical efficacy.

SUBMITTER: Chun YS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5937242 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jul-Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Systemic and Adjuvant Therapies for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Chun Yun Shin YS Javle Milind M

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center 20170701 3

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma represents the second most common primary liver cancer and is increasing in incidence. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced, nonsurgical stage and only about 1 in 5 cases are surgically resectable. Despite surgery, the 5-year survival is low at only 30%. Multifocal, node- or margin-positive disease is at a higher risk of recurrence after resection. There is no level 1 evidence in support of postoperative adjuvant therapy. A recent adjuvant therapy phase III ...[more]

PMID: 28975832

Similar Datasets

Project description:Presentation of the Case A 37-year-old woman presented at 35 weeks of gestation with her third child with failure to adequately gain weight and was noted by her obstetrician to have delay in the growth of her baby. Ultrasound of the abdomen incidentally revealed the presence of a liver lesion. After additional evaluation, she ultimately delivered her daughter at 36 weeks uneventfully. She subsequently underwent additional evaluation. Liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 5-cm solitary solid mass in segment 4A of the liver, concerning for malignancy. Serum α-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen (CA)19-9, CA15-3, and CA125 were all normal. Liver biopsy was positive for adenocarcinoma. The tumor cells demonstrated a phenotype suggesting a possible breast primary, although the immunohistochemistry did not support that diagnosis and the tumor was negative for mammaglobin, gross cystic disease fluid protein (GCDFP)-15, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) (Table 1). The tumor was also CDX2 and cardiotrophin-1 negative, but cytokeratin (CK) 19 positive. Her endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, breast mammogram, and breast MRI were completely normal. A positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan showed a fluorodeoxyglucose-avid 5.8-cm × 6.0-cm hypoattenuating lesion with peripheral enhancement involving segment 4 and segment 8 at the dome. In addition, central necrosis within the lesion was noted. The left main portal vein was mildly attenuated by the mass. She eventually underwent a left hepatectomy en bloc with caudate resection, portal lymphadenectomy, cholecystectomy, and omental pedicle flap. On exploration of the abdomen, no additional disease was noted. The final pathology revealed a 9.4-cm moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the intrahepatic bile ducts. Venous invasion was present. Perineural invasion was absent. The margins were negative. Thirteen lymph nodes were obtained, all of which were negative, consistent with a stage T2, N0, MX intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The tumor was positive for CK7, CK19, and CA19-9 and negative for CK20, CDX2, CA125, ER, PR, GCDFP-15, synaptophysin, and chromogranin (Table 1). The uninvolved liver was unremarkable and a trichrome stain showed no fibrosis. Following an uneventful postoperative recovery, she was referred for consideration of adjuvant therapy.

Project description:Background and aimsThe prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after radical resection is far from satisfactory; however, the clinical value of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of AT and identify potential patients who would be benefited from AT.MethodsData from ICC patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively collected from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China between December 2012 and December 2015. Patients were divided into AT and non-AT groups based on whether AT was administered or not. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method before and after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the established staging systems.ResultsA total of 412 patients were enrolled in this study, and 77 patients (18.9%) received AT, including 32 (7.8%) patients who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 21 (5.1%) patients who received chemotherapy, 10 (2.4%) patients who received radiotherapy, and 14 (3.4%) patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The median OS and DFS were both longer in the AT group than in the non-AT group (43.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .015; 16.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .045, respectively), and the advantage of AT was confirmed for both the OS and DFS (P = .023; P = .046, respectively) after 1:2 PSM. Furthermore, based on the established nomogram, only "middle-risk" patients receiving AT cherished a longer median OS (43.0 months vs 20.0 months, P = .033). In subgroup analyses that were stratified by different AT strategies, patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy had a longer median OS (37.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .039), while patients receiving postoperative TACE had a longer median DFS (50.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .007).ConclusionWith the current data, we conclude that AT benefits ICC patients following radical resection, especially those "middle-risk" patients, as evaluated by the established nomogram. However, exactly which patients are the most suitable for AT requires further study and validation.

Project description:BackgroundThe effectiveness of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after hepatectomy remains unclear. This study was performed to identify ICC patients who would benefit from adjuvant TACE.Patients and methodsThe study included 553 patients who underwent hepatectomy for ICC between January 2008 and February 2011 at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital and who were treated with or without TACE (122 with TACE and 431 without TACE). Survival risk stratification was performed using the established prognostic nomogram (ICC nomogram). The predictive performance was evaluated by concordance index and calibration. The tumor recurrence and overall survival (OS) rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsThe predictive performance of the ICC nomogram was demonstrated by the well-fitted calibration curves and an optimal c-index of 0.71 for OS prediction. In the whole cohort, the 5-year recurrence and OS rates between the TACE and non-TACE groups were significantly different (5-year recurrence: 72.9% vs. 78.1%; OS: 38.4% vs. 29.7%). After 1:1 PSM, the TACE and non-TACE groups (122 patients each) had similar 5-year recurrence and OS rates (5-year recurrence: 72.9% vs. 74.2%; OS: 38.4% vs. 36.0%). By survival risk stratification based on ICC nomogram, only the patients in the lowest tertile (nomogram scores ?77) benefited from adjuvant TACE (TACE vs. non-TACE groups: 90.4% vs. 95.9% for 5-year recurrence; 21.3% vs. 6.2% for 5-year OS).ConclusionAdjuvant TACE following liver resection might be suitable for ICC patients with high ICC nomogram scores (?77).Implications for practiceThe accurate predictive performance of the established prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) following liver resection was reconfirmed in an independent cohort with 553 patients. Based on the survival risk stratification using the nomogram, adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization following liver resection might be suitable only for ICC patients with high scores from the nomogram.

Dataset Information

Systemic and Adjuvant Therapies for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Publications

Systemic and Adjuvant Therapies for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets