Initial Clinical Experience with AZD5718, a Novel Once Daily Oral 5-Lipoxygenase Activating Protein Inhibitor.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ericsson H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5944575 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background and objectiveAZD5718, a 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP) inhibitor, is in clinical development for treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study evaluated AZD5718 pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability in healthy male Japanese subjects.MethodsFour cohorts of eight Japanese subjects were randomized to receive oral doses of AZD5718 (60, 180, 360, and 600 mg) or matching placebo administered as a single dose on Day 1 and as once-daily doses from Day 3 to Day 10 in fasted conditions. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety data were collected.ResultsThe pharmacokinetics characteristics of AZD5718 in Japanese male subjects were similar to those reported in a previous study, and the pharmacokinetics were characterized as rapid absorption with median time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) of 1-2 h Creatine-normalized urine maximum concentration (Cmax) with mean half-lives ranging from 8 to 21 h, and supra-proportional increase in exposure over the 60-600 mg dose range evaluated. Also, an increase in steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) compared to the first dose was observed. After both single and multiple doses of AZD5718, a clear dose/concentration-effect relationship was shown for urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) versus AZD5718 exposure with > 80 % inhibition at plasma concentrations in the lower nM range. No clinically relevant safety and tolerability findings were observed.ConclusionsThe observed pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were similar to reported data for non-Japanese healthy subjects, which support further evaluation of AZD5718 at similar doses/exposures in Japanese and non-Japanese subjects for future evaluation in patients with CAD and CKD.
| S-EPMC8481180 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPatients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remain at risk for kidney and cardiovascular events resulting from residual albuminuria, despite available treatments. Leukotrienes are proinflammatory and vasoconstrictive lipid mediators implicated in the etiology of chronic inflammatory diseases. AZD5718 is a potent, selective, and reversible 5-lipoxygenase activating protein (FLAP) inhibitor that suppresses leukotriene production.MethodsFLAIR (FLAP Inhibition in Renal disease) is an ongoing phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AZD5718 in patients with proteinuric CKD with or without type 2 diabetes. Participants receive AZD5718 at 3 different doses or placebo once daily for 12 weeks, followed by an 8-week extension in which they also receive dapagliflozin (10 mg/d) as anticipated future standard of care. The planned sample size is 632 participants, providing 91% power to detect 30% reduction in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) between the maximum dose of AZD5718 and placebo. The dose-response effect of AZD5718 on UACR after the dapagliflozin extension is the primary efficacy objective. Key secondary objectives are the dose-response effect of AZD5718 plus current standard of care on UACR and acute effects of treatment on the estimated glomerular filtration rate. Safety, tolerability, AZD5718 pharmacokinetics, and analyses of biomarkers that may predict or reflect response to AZD5718 are additional objectives.ConclusionFLAIR will provide data on the effects of 5-lipoxygenase pathway inhibition in patients with proteinuric CKD with or without type 2 diabetes, and will form the basis for future clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04492722).
| S-EPMC8589691 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimTo assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor, GSK2190915, after oral dosing in two independent phase I studies, one in Western European and one in Japanese subjects, utilizing different formulations.MethodWestern European subjects received single (50-1000 mg) or multiple (10-450 mg) oral doses of GSK2190915 or placebo in a dose-escalating manner. Japanese subjects received three of four GSK2190915 doses (10-200 mg) plus placebo once in a four period crossover design. Blood samples were collected for GSK2190915 concentrations and blood and urine were collected to measure leukotriene B₄ and leukotriene E₄, respectively, as pharmacodynamic markers of drug activity.ResultsThere was no clear difference in adverse events between placebo and active drug-treated subjects in either study. Maximum plasma concentrations of GSK2190915 and area under the curve increased in a dose-related manner and mean half-life values ranged from 16-34 h. Dose-dependent inhibition of blood leukotriene B₄ production was observed and near complete inhibition of urinary leukotriene E₄ excretion was shown at all doses except the lowest dose. The EC₅₀ values for inhibition of LTB₄ were 85 nM and 89 nM in the Western European and Japanese studies, respectively.ConclusionGSK2190915 is well-tolerated with pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Western European and Japanese subjects that support once daily dosing for 24 h inhibition of leukotrienes. Doses of ≥50 mg show near complete inhibition of urinary leukotriene E₄ at 24 h post-dose, whereas doses of ≥150 mg are required for 24 h inhibition of blood LTB₄.
| S-EPMC3575944 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsTo understand patient preferences for once-daily oral versus once-weekly injectable type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) medication administration profiles, and reasons for their preferences.Materials and methodsThe REVISE study, a cross-sectional online survey of 600 participants with T2DM (United Kingdom, n = 300; United States, n = 300), elicited general preferences for once-daily oral versus once-weekly injectable diabetes medications, and reasons for the preference. Participants then viewed two videos describing the administration procedures for injectable dulaglutide and oral semaglutide, based on the product instructions for use. Thereafter, participants indicated their preference for a once-weekly injectable or a once-daily oral medication based on the video descriptions. Participants who switched preferences were asked to identify the reasons influencing their decision.ResultsThe participants were predominantly male (n = 349; 58.2%), with a mean (SD) age of 64 (11.3) years. Nearly all (n = 557; 92.8%) were taking an oral T2DM medication, and 158 (26.3%) were using an injectable. Initially, 76.5% (n = 459; 95% confidence interval [CI] 73.1-79.9) preferred a once-daily oral and 23.5% a once-weekly injectable (n = 141; 95% CI 20.1-26.9; P < 0.0001). After viewing the videos describing the product-specific administration, the proportions of participants preferring each option were not statistically different (oral semaglutide administration description (n = 315; 52.5%; 95% CI 48.5-56.5; dulaglutide administration description (n = 285; 47.5%; 95% CI 43.5-51.5; NS, P = 0.2207). The most common reason for switching preferences was the timing and steps of administration.ConclusionSeveral treatment-related characteristics, including route, frequency and complexity of the treatment, play a role in patients' preferences for T2DM treatments and should be considered during treatment selection.
| S-EPMC7839441 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients with coronary artery disease remain at increased risk of recurrent life-threatening cardiovascular events even after adequate guideline-based treatment of conventional risk factors, including blood lipid levels. Inflammation is a critical pathway in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and is independently associated with risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Leukotrienes are potent pro-inflammatory and vasoactive mediators synthesized by leukocytes in atherosclerotic lesions. AZD5718 is a novel antagonist of 5-lipoxygenase activating protein that suppresses leukotriene biosynthesis. FLAVOUR is a phase IIa efficacy and safety study of AZD5718 in patients with myocardial infarction 1-4 weeks before randomization. Stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery after percutaneous intervention must be <50%, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade must be ? 2. Enrolled participants receive standard care plus oral AZD5718 200 mg, 50 mg, or placebo once daily for up to 12 weeks (extended from 4 weeks by protocol amendment). The planned sample size is 100 participants randomized to 12 weeks' treatment. Change in urine leukotriene E4 levels is the primary efficacy outcome. FLAVOUR also aims to evaluate whether AZD5718 can improve coronary microvascular function, as measured by transthoracic colour Doppler-assisted coronary flow velocity reserve. Centrally pretrained study sonographers use standardized protocols and equipment. Additional outcomes include assessment of comprehensive echocardiographic parameters (including coronary flow, global strain, early diastolic strain rate and left ventricular ejection fraction), arterial stiffness, biomarkers, health-related quality of life, and safety. Specific anti-inflammatory therapies may represent novel promising treatments to reduce residual risk in patients with coronary artery disease. By combining primary pharmacodynamic and secondary cardiovascular surrogate efficacy outcomes, FLAVOUR aims to investigate the mechanistic basis and potential benefits of AZD5718 treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.
| S-EPMC7451793 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We investigated the effect of two dosing regimens of oral iron on iron status and hematological parameters in patients with CKD. In this single center, open label, randomized, active controlled clinical trial, stable adult patients with CKD stage G3-4 with percentage transferrin saturation (%TSAT) ≤ 30% and serum ferritin ≤ 500 ng/ml were eligible. Participants were randomized to receive either 100 mg of ferrous ascorbate once daily (OD group) or 100 mg of ferrous ascorbate twice daily (BD group, total daily dose 200 mg). The primary outcome was change in %TSAT between groups over 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were changes in other iron status and hematological parameters, serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and hepcidin. 80 participants were enrolled out of which 76 completed the study. Change in %TSAT was not significantly different between groups (β = - 1.43, 95% CI - 3.99 to 1.12, BD group as reference). The rise in serum ferritin was less in the OD group as compared to BD group (β = - 0.36, 95% CI - 0.61 to - 0.10) whereas MCHC increased in the OD group as compared to decrease in the BD group (β = 0.37, 95% CI 0.067-0.67). These observations need exploration to ascertain the impact of different oral iron dosing strategies in CKD.
| S-EPMC9813132 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionTrelagliptin, a novel once-weekly oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, has shown favorable efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Trelagliptin was launched in Japan, and is expected to be initially used for switchover from a daily DPP-4 inhibitor in the clinical setting. Thus, the present study was carried out to explore the efficacy and safety of trelagliptin after a daily DPP-4 inhibitor was switched to it.Materials and methodsThis was an open-label, phase 3 exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trelagliptin in Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who had stable glycemic control on once-daily sitagliptin therapy. Eligible patients received trelagliptin 100 mg orally before breakfast once a week for 12 weeks. The primary end-point was blood glucose by the meal tolerance test, and additional end-points were glycemic control (efficacy) and safety.ResultsAltogether, 14 patients received the study drug. The blood glucose did not markedly change from baseline at major assessment points in the meal tolerance test, and a decrease in blood glucose was observed at several other assessment points. Adverse events were reported in 42.9% (6/14) of patients, but all adverse events were mild or moderate in severity, and most were not related to the study drug. No cases of death, serious adverse events or hypoglycemia were reported.DiscussionIt is considered possible to switch a once-daily DPP-4 inhibitor to trelagliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with stable glycemic control in combination with diet and exercise therapy without any major influences on glycemic control or safety.
| S-EPMC5835476 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of maraviroc along with darunavir/ritonavir, all once daily, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected individuals.DesignMODERN was a multicentre, double-blind, noninferiority, phase III study in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral-naive adults with plasma HIV-1 RNA at least 1000 copies/ml and no evidence of reduced susceptibility to study drugs.MethodsAt screening, participants were randomized 1 : 1 to undergo either genotypic or phenotypic tropism testing. Participants with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 were randomized 1 : 1 to receive maraviroc 150 mg once daily or tenofovir/emtricitabine once daily each with darunavir/ritonavir once daily for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml (Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) at Week 48. A substudy evaluated bone mineral density, body fat distribution and serum bone turnover markers.ResultsSeven hundred and ninety-seven participants were dosed (maraviroc, n = 396; tenofovir/emtricitabine, n = 401). The Data Monitoring Committee recommended early study termination due to inferior efficacy in the maraviroc group. At Week 48, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml was 77.3% for maraviroc and 86.8% for tenofovir/emtricitabine [difference of -9.54% (95% confidence interval: -14.83 to -4.24)]. More maraviroc participants discontinued for lack of efficacy, which was not associated with non-R5 tropism or resistance. Discontinuations for adverse events, Category C events, Grade 3/4 adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between groups.ConclusionA once-daily nucleos(t)ide-sparing two-drug regimen of maraviroc and darunavir/ritonavir was inferior to a three-drug regimen of tenofovir/emtricitabine and darunavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults.
| S-EPMC4856180 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundData on the safety and effectiveness of once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in comparison to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and to one another in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and recent stroke are scarce.Patients and methodsBased on prospectively obtained data from the observational registry Novel-Oral-Anticoagulants-in-Ischemic-Stroke-Patients(NOACISP)-LONGTERM (NCT03826927) from Basel, Switzerland, we compared the occurrence of the primary outcome - the composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause death - among consecutive AF patients treated with either VKA, QD DOAC, or BID DOAC following a recent stroke using Cox proportional hazards regression including adjustment for potential confounders.ResultsWe analyzed 956 patients (median age 80 years, 46% female), of whom 128 received VKA (13.4%), 264 QD DOAC (27.6%), and 564 BID DOAC (59%). Over a total follow-up of 1596 patient-years, both QD DOAC and BID DOAC showed a lower hazard for the composite outcome compared to VKA (adjusted HR [95% CI] 0.69 [0.48, 1.01] and 0.66 [0.47, 0.91], respectively). Upon direct comparison, the hazard for the composite outcome did not differ between patients treated with QD versus BID DOAC (adjusted HR [95% CI] 0.94 [0.70, 1.26]). Secondary analyses focusing on the individual components of the composite outcome revealed no clear differences in the risk-benefit profile of QD versus BID DOAC.Discussion and conclusionThe overall benefit of DOAC over VKA seems to apply to both QD and BID DOAC in AF patients with a recent stroke, without clear evidence that one DOAC dosing regimen is more advantageous than the other.
| S-EPMC9446322 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To quantify contrast material enhancement of breast lesions scanned with dedicated breast computed tomography (CT) and to compare their conspicuity with that at unenhanced breast CT and mammography.Approval of the institutional review board and the Radiation Use Committee and written informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Between September 2006 and April 2009, 46 women (mean age, 53.2 years; age range, 35-72 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 lesions underwent unenhanced breast CT and contrast material-enhanced breast CT before biopsy. Two radiologists independently scored lesion conspicuity for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus mammography and for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus unenhanced breast CT. Mean lesion voxel intensity was measured in Hounsfield units and normalized to adipose tissue intensity on manually segmented images obtained before and after administration of contrast material. Regression models focused on conspicuity and quantified enhancement were used to estimate the effect of pathologic diagnosis (benign vs malignant), lesion type (mass vs calcifications), breast density, and interradiologist variability.Fifty-four lesions (25 benign, 29 malignant) in 46 subjects were analyzed. Malignant lesions were seen significantly better at contrast-enhanced breast CT than at unenhanced breast CT (P < .001) or mammography (P < .001). Malignant calcifications (malignant lesions manifested mammographically as microcalcifications only, n = 7) were seen better at contrast-enhanced breast CT than at unenhanced breast CT (P < .001) and were seen similarly at contrast-enhanced breast CT and mammography. Malignant lesions enhanced 55.9 HU +/- 4.0 (standard error), whereas benign lesions enhanced 17.6 HU +/- 6.1 (P < .001). Ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 5) enhanced a mean of 59.6 HU +/- 2.8. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of lesion enhancement yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.876.Conspicuity of malignant breast lesions, including ductal carcinoma in situ, is significantly improved at contrast-enhanced breast CT. Quantifying lesion enhancement may aid in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.
| S-EPMC2923727 | biostudies-other