Dataset Information

New patient-controlled abdominal compression method in radiography: radiation dose and image quality.

ABSTRACT: Background:The radiation dose for patients can be reduced with many methods and one way is to use abdominal compression. In this study, the radiation dose and image quality for a new patient-controlled compression device were compared with conventional compression and compression in the prone position. Purpose:To compare radiation dose and image quality of patient-controlled compression compared with conventional and prone compression in general radiography. Material and Methods:An experimental design with quantitative approach. After obtaining the approval of the ethics committee, a consecutive sample of 48 patients was examined with the standard clinical urography protocol. The radiation doses were measured as dose-area product and analyzed with a paired t-test. The image quality was evaluated by visual grading analysis. Four radiologists evaluated each image individually by scoring nine criteria modified from the European quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Results:There was no significant difference in radiation dose or image quality between conventional and patient-controlled compression. Prone position resulted in both higher dose and inferior image quality. Conclusion:Patient-controlled compression gave similar dose levels as conventional compression and lower than prone compression. Image quality was similar with both patient-controlled and conventional compression and was judged to be better than in the prone position.

SUBMITTER: Piippo-Huotari O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5946613 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

New patient-controlled abdominal compression method in radiography: radiation dose and image quality.

Piippo-Huotari Oili O Norrman Eva E Anderzén-Carlsson Agneta A Geijer Håkan H

Acta radiologica open 20180503 5

<h4>Background</h4>The radiation dose for patients can be reduced with many methods and one way is to use abdominal compression. In this study, the radiation dose and image quality for a new patient-controlled compression device were compared with conventional compression and compression in the prone position<i>.</i><h4>Purpose</h4>To compare radiation dose and image quality of patient-controlled compression compared with conventional and prone compression in general radiography.<h4>Material and ...[more]

PMID: 29760949

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:To evaluate the image quality of low-dose chest digital radiographic images obtained with a new spatial noise reduction algorithm, compared to a conventional de-noising technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In 69 patients, the dose reduction protocol was divided into A, B, and C test groups- 60% (n = 22), 50% (n = 23), and 40% (n = 24) of the baseline dose. In each patient, baseline dose radiographs were obtained with conventional image processing while low-dose images were acquired with new image processing. A set of baseline and low-dose radiographic images per patient was evaluated and scored on a 5-point scale over seven anatomical landmarks (radiolucency of unobscured lung, pulmonary vascularity, trachea, edge of rib, heart border, intervertebral disc space, and pulmonary vessels in the retrocardiac area) and three representative abnormal findings (nodule, consolidation, and interstitial marking) by two thoracic radiologists. A comparison of paired baseline and low-dose images was statistically analyzed using a non-inferiority test based on the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS:In A, B, and C test groups, the mean dose reduction rate of the baseline radiation dose was 63.4%, 53.9%, and 47.8%, respectively. In all test groups, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was less than the non-inferiority margin of 0.5 every seven anatomical landmarks and three representative abnormal findings, which suggested that the image quality of the low-dose image was not inferior to that of the baseline dose image even if the maximum average dose reduction rate was reduced to 47.8% of the baseline dose. CONCLUSION:In our study, an image processing technique integrating a new noise reduction algorithm achieved dose reductions of approximately half without compromising image quality for abnormal lung findings and anatomical landmarks seen on chest radiographs. This feature-preserving, noise reduction algorithm adopted in the proposed engine enables a lower radiation dose boundary for the sake of patient's and radiography technologist's radiation safety in routine clinical practice, in compliance with regulatory guidelines.

Project description:BackgroundMultiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is a commonly used modality in pediatric computed tomography (CT) scans. However, the purposes and focus of each phase, such as CT angiography (CTA), and parenchymal phase, are different. In routine practice, the same scanning parameters are used for all phases, resulting in unnecessary radiation exposure for children. Accurately and rapidly adjusting the scanning parameters for each phase of CECT is challenging in clinical settings. This retrospective cross-sectional study was designed to investigate the feasibility of using both CARE kV and CARE Dose 4D to reduce the radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic quality in multiphase CECT scans of children.MethodsOverall, 57 children (33 males and 24 females) who underwent multiphase abdominal CECT in Xinjiang Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital with an average age of 6.52±4.30 years (range, 0.1-15 years), were enrolled. The tube voltage was automatically modulated using CARE kV. The tube current was automatically modulated using CARE Dose 4D. Different dose saving optimization indices (DI) were used for the three phases: a DI value of 3 was used for the unenhanced CT phase, a DI value of 12 was used for the CTA phase, and a DI value of 7 was used for the parenchymal phase. The tube voltage and volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were recorded for each phase. Two reviewers subjectively evaluated the overall image quality and noise level of the three phases using a 5-point Likert scale (1-2 points: unqualified, 3 points: qualified, 4 points: better, 5 points: best). The CT and noise values of the descending aorta, liver, and back muscle were measured objectively. The voltage distribution and the image quality and CTDIvol in each phase were compared.ResultsThe most selected tube voltage in the unenhanced CT, CTA, and parenchymal phases was 100 kV (49/57, 85.96%), 70 kV (36/57, 63.16%), and 80 kV (32/57, 56.14%), respectively. The differences between the three phases were statistically significant (P<0.001). The CTDIvol values of the three phases were 3.99±1.99, 2.02±1.71, and 3.18±2.10 mGy, respectively, with a significant difference between the three phases (P<0.001). The CTDIvol decreased linearly as the DI value increased. All images met the diagnostic requirements. The overall quality scores for the three phases were 4.24±0.42, 4.41±0.49, and 4.50±0.45, respectively, with no significant linear relationship with the change in the DI.ConclusionsThe combined use of CARE Dose 4D and CARE kV could effectively reduce the radiation dose in children during multiphase abdominal CECT without compromising the diagnostic image quality.

Project description:To evaluate the image quality of virtual monochromatic images synthesized from dual-source dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in comparison with conventional polychromatic single-energy CT for the same radiation dose.In dual-energy CT, besides the material-specific information, one may also synthesize monochromatic images at different energies, which can be used for routine diagnosis similar to conventional polychromatic single-energy images. In this work, the authors assessed whether virtual monochromatic images generated from dual-source CT scanners had an image quality similar to that of polychromatic single-energy images for the same radiation dose. First, the authors provided a theoretical analysis of the optimal monochromatic energy for either the minimum noise level or the highest iodine contrast to noise ratio (CNR) for a given patient size and dose partitioning between the low- and high-energy scans. Second, the authors performed an experimental study on a dual-source CT scanner to evaluate the noise and iodine CNR in monochromatic images. A thoracic phantom with three sizes of attenuating rings was used to represent four adult sizes. For each phantom size, three dose partitionings between the low-energy (80 kV) and the high-energy (140 kV) scans were used in the dual-energy scan. Monochromatic images at eight energies (40 to 110 keV) were generated for each scan. Phantoms were also scanned at each of the four polychromatic single energy (80, 100, 120, and 140 kV) with the same radiation dose.The optimal virtual monochromatic energy depends on several factors: phantom size, partitioning of the radiation dose between low- and high-energy scans, and the image quality metrics to be optimized. With the increase of phantom size, the optimal monochromatic energy increased. With the increased percentage of radiation dose on the low energy scan, the optimal monochromatic energy decreased. When maximizing the iodine CNR in monochromatic images, the optimal energy was lower than that when minimizing noise level. When the total radiation dose was equally distributed between low and high energy in dual-energy scans, for minimum noise, the optimal energies were 68, 71, 74, and 77 keV for small, medium, large, and extra-large (xlarge) phantoms, respectively; for maximum iodine CNR, the optimal energies were 66, 68, 70, 72 keV. With the optimal monochromatic energy, the noise level was similar to and the CNR was better than that in a single-energy scan at 120 kV for the same radiation dose. Compared to an 80 kV scan, however, the iodine CNR in monochromatic images was lower for the small, medium, and large phantoms.In dual-source dual-energy CT, optimal virtual monochromatic energy depends on patient size, dose partitioning, and the image quality metric optimized. With the optimal monochromatic energy, the noise level was similar to and the iodine CNR was better than that in 120 kV images for the same radiation dose. Compared to single-energy 80 kV images, the iodine CNR in virtual monochromatic images was lower for small to large phantom sizes.

Dataset Information

New patient-controlled abdominal compression method in radiography: radiation dose and image quality.

Publications

New patient-controlled abdominal compression method in radiography: radiation dose and image quality.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets