Dataset Information

Gestational weight gain in Chinese women -- results from a retrospective cohort in Changsha, China.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The generalizability of the gestational weight gain (GWG) ranges recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to Chinese women is disputed.

Methods

In 2016, 16,780 pregnant women who gave birth to live singletons in Changsha, China, were enrolled. First, subjects with optimal pregnancy outcomes were identified for the GWG percentile distribution description and for comparison to the IOM recommendations. Second, all subjects with optimal GWG according to the IOM body mass index (BMI) cutoffs and those with optimal GWG according to the Asian BMI cutoffs were selected. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between those two groups.

Results

A total of 13,717 births with optimal pregnancy outcomes were selected to describe the GWG distribution. The height and central position of the GWG distributions determined by the Asian BMI cutoffs differed from those determined by the IOM BMI cutoffs among the overweight and obese groups. The recommended IOM GWG ranges were narrower than and shifted to the left of the observed distributions. In both BMI classification schemes, however, the IOM-recommended ranges were within the middle 70% (Pc 15th-85th) and 50% (Pc 25th-75th) of the observed distribution. A total of 6438 (38.37%) and 6110 (36.41%) women gained optimal GWG, according to the IOM and Asian BMI classifications, respectively. Compared with those with optimal GWG according to IOM BMI cutoffs, women with optimal GWG according to the Asian BMI cutoffs had lower risks of both macrosomia (adjusted OR?=?0.79, 95%CI: 0.67-0.94) and large-for-gestational age (adjusted OR?=?0.86, 95%CI: 0.76, 0.98). However, no significantly different risks of preterm, low birthweight, small-for-gestational age, pregnancy-induced hypertension, or gestational diabetes were found between them.

Conclusions

The IOM-recommended GWG ranges are within the middle 70% of the distributions in Chinese women, and pre-pregnancy weight status should be determined by the Asian BMI cut-off points for monitoring and making GWG recommendations to Chinese women.

SUBMITTER: Huang X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5975263 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Gestational weight gain in Chinese women -- results from a retrospective cohort in Changsha, China.

Huang Xin X Tan Hongzhuan H Cai Ming M Shi Ting T Mi Chunmei C Lei Jun J

BMC pregnancy and childbirth 20180529 1

<h4>Background</h4>The generalizability of the gestational weight gain (GWG) ranges recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to Chinese women is disputed.<h4>Methods</h4>In 2016, 16,780 pregnant women who gave birth to live singletons in Changsha, China, were enrolled. First, subjects with optimal pregnancy outcomes were identified for the GWG percentile distribution description and for comparison to the IOM recommendations. Second, all subjects with optimal GWG according to the IOM body m ...[more]

PMID: 29843642

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionDespite the important clinical significance, limited data on the joint contribution of prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) to preeclampsia, the second leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. This study aimed to estimate the risk of preeclampsia by GWG among women with varied prepregnancy BMI.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using data of 117 738 singleton pregnant women aged 18-49 years from 150 maternity hospitals in China between 2015 and 2018. GWG was calculated as the measured weight at the time of preeclampsia assessment minus prepregnancy weight; GWG velocity was calculated as the GWG divided by the gestational age at weighing. The non-linear associations of GWG with preeclampsia were examined by restricted cubic spline regression analysis according to prepregnancy BMI. The association of the GWG categories with preeclampsia was further examined by performing robust Poisson regression stratified by the prepregnancy BMI categories.ResultsAmong participants, 2426 (2.06%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia. Compared to women with normal BMI, those who were overweight and obese had 1.92- fold (95%CI, 1.73-2.14) and 5.06- fold (95%CI, 4.43-5.78) increased risks for preeclampsia, respectively. The association of GWG velocity with preeclampsia was presented as a J-shaped curve with the varied inflexion point (where the rate of preeclampsia was 2%), which was 0.54, 0.38, and 0.25 kg/week in women with normal BMI, overweight, and obesity, respectively; a steep risk rise was observed along with GWG velocity beyond the inflexion points. The overall adjusted relative risk for preeclampsia was calculated among women with the different GWG categories of GWG.ConclusionsThe findings highlight that high prepregnancy BMI and exceed GWG contributed to increased risk of preeclampsia with a superimposed effect and underscore the need to optimize the recommendations for GWG for women with different prepregnancy BMI.

Project description:ObjectiveTo explore the joint and independent effects of gestational weight gain (GWG) and pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) on pregnancy outcomes in a population of Chinese Han women and to evaluate pregnant women's adherence to the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain guidelines.MethodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 48,867 primiparous women from mainland China who had a full-term singleton birth between January 1, 2011 and December 30, 2011. The independent associations of pre-pregnancy BMI, GWG and categories of combined pre-pregnancy BMI and GWG with outcomes of interest were examined using an adjusted multivariate regression model. In addition, women with pre-pregnancy hypertension were excluded from the analysis of the relationship between GWG and delivery of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, and women with gestational diabetes (GDM) were excluded from the analysis of the relationship between GWG and delivery of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants.ResultsOnly 36.8% of the women had a weight gain that was within the recommended range; 25% and 38.2% had weight gains that were below and above the recommended range, respectively. The contribution of GWG to the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes was modest. Women with excessive GWG had an increased likelihood of gestational hypertension (adjusted OR 2.55; 95% CI = 1.92-2.80), postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted OR 1.30; 95% CI = 1.17-1.45), cesarean section (adjusted OR 1.31; 95% CI = 1.18-1.36) and delivery of an LGA infant (adjusted OR 2.1; 95% CI = 1.76-2.26) compared with women with normal weight gain. Conversely, the incidence of GDM (adjusted OR 1.64; 95% CI = 1.20-1.85) and SGA infants (adjusted OR 1.51; 95% CI = 1.32-1.72) was increased in the group of women with inadequate GWG. Moreover, in the obese women, excessive GWG was associated with an apparent increased risk of delivering an LGA infant. In the women who were underweight, poor weight gain was associated with an increased likelihood of delivering an SGA infant. After excluding the mothers with GDM or gestational hypertension, the ORs for delivery of LGA and SGA infants decreased for women with high GWG and increased for women with low GWG.ConclusionsGWG above the recommended range is common in this population and is associated with multiple unfavorable outcomes independent of pre-pregnancy BMI. Obese women may benefit from avoiding weight gain above the range recommended by the 2009 IOM. Underweight women should avoid low GWG to prevent delivering an SGA infant. Pregnant women should therefore be monitored to comply with the IOM recommendations and should have a balanced weight gain that is within a range based on their pre-pregnancy BMI.

Dataset Information

Gestational weight gain in Chinese women -- results from a retrospective cohort in Changsha, China.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Gestational weight gain in Chinese women -- results from a retrospective cohort in Changsha, China.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets