Dataset Information

Early rehabilitation for volumetric muscle loss injury augments endogenous regenerative aspects of muscle strength and oxidative capacity.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries occur due to orthopaedic trauma or the surgical removal of skeletal muscle and result in debilitating long-term functional deficits. Current treatment strategies do not promote significant restoration of function; additionally appropriate evidenced-based practice physical therapy paradigms have yet to be established. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate early rehabilitation paradigms of passive range of motion and electrical stimulation in isolation or combination to understand the genetic and functional response in the tissue remaining after a multi-muscle VML injury.

Methods

Adult male mice underwent an ~?20% multi-muscle VML injury to the posterior compartment (gastrocnemius, soleus, and plantaris muscle) unilaterally and were randomized to rehabilitation paradigm twice per week beginning 2 days post-injury or no treatment.

Results

The most salient findings of this work are: 1) that the remaining muscle tissue after VML injury was adaptable in terms of improved muscle strength and mitigation of stiffness; but 2) not adaptable to improvements in metabolic capacity. Furthermore, biochemical (i.e., collagen content) and gene (i.e., gene arrays) assays suggest that functional adaptations may reflect changes in the biomechanical properties of the remaining tissue due to the cellular deposition of non-contractile tissue in the void left by the VML injury and/or differentiation of gene expression with early rehabilitation.

Conclusions

Collectively this work provides evidence of genetic and functional plasticity in the remaining skeletal muscle with early rehabilitation approaches, which may facilitate future evidenced-based practice of early rehabilitation at the clinical level.

SUBMITTER: Greising SM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5975473 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Early rehabilitation for volumetric muscle loss injury augments endogenous regenerative aspects of muscle strength and oxidative capacity.

Greising Sarah M SM Warren Gordon L GL Southern W Michael WM Nichenko Anna S AS Qualls Anita E AE Corona Benjamin T BT Call Jarrod A JA

BMC musculoskeletal disorders 20180529 1

<h4>Background</h4>Volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries occur due to orthopaedic trauma or the surgical removal of skeletal muscle and result in debilitating long-term functional deficits. Current treatment strategies do not promote significant restoration of function; additionally appropriate evidenced-based practice physical therapy paradigms have yet to be established. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate early rehabilitation paradigms of passive range of motion and electr ...[more]

PMID: 29843673

Similar Datasets

Project description:The primary objective of this study was to determine if low- or high-resistance voluntary wheel running leads to functional improvements in muscle strength (i.e., isometric and isokinetic torque) and metabolic function (i.e., permeabilized fibre bundle mitochondrial respiration) after a volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury. C57BL/6J mice were randomized into one of four experimental groups at age 12 weeks: uninjured control, VML untreated (VML), low-resistance wheel running (VML-LR) and high-resistance wheel running (VML-HR). All mice, excluding the uninjured, were subject to a unilateral VML injury to the plantar flexor muscles and wheel running began 3 days post-VML. At 8 weeks post-VML, peak isometric torque was greater in uninjured compared to all VML-injured groups, but both VML-LR and VML-HR had greater (∼32%) peak isometric torque compared to VML. All VML-injured groups had less isokinetic torque compared to uninjured, and there was no statistical difference among VML, VML-LR and VML-HR. No differences in cumulative running distance were observed between VML-LR and VML-HR groups. Because adaptations in VML-HR peak isometric torque were attributed to greater gastrocnemius muscle mass, atrophy- and hypertrophy-related protein content and post-translational modifications were explored via immunoblot; however, results were inconclusive. Permeabilized fibre bundle mitochondrial oxygen consumption was 22% greater in uninjured compared to VML, but there was no statistical difference among VML, VML-LR and VML-HR. Furthermore, neither wheel running group demonstrated a change in the relative protein content of the mitochondrial biogenesis transcription factor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1-α (PGC-1α). These results indicate that resistance wheel running alone only has modest benefits in the VML-injured muscle. NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of the study? Does initiation of a resistance wheel running regimen following volumetric muscle loss (VML) improve the functional capacity of skeletal muscle? What is the main finding and its importance? Resistance wheel running led to greater muscle mass and strength in mice with a VML injury but did not result in a full recovery. Neither low- nor high-resistance wheel running was associated with a change in permeabilized muscle fibre respiration despite runners having greater whole-body treadmill endurance capacity, suggesting resilience to metabolic adaptations in VML-injured muscle. Resistance wheel running may be a suitable adjuvant rehabilitation strategy, but alone does not fully mitigate VML pathology.

Project description:A key event in the etiology of volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury is the bulk loss of structural cues provided by the underlying extracellular matrix (ECM). To re-establish the lost cues, there is broad consensus within the literature supporting the utilization of implantable scaffolding. However, while scaffold based regenerative medicine strategies have shown potential, there remains a significant amount of outcome variability observed across the field. We suggest that an overlooked source of outcome variability is differences in scaffolding architecture. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that implant alignment has a significant impact on genotypic and phenotypic outcomes following the repair of VML injuries. Using a rat VML model, outcomes across three autograft implant treatment groups (aligned implants, 45° misaligned, and 90° misaligned) and two recovery time points (2 weeks and 12 weeks) were examined (n = 6-8/group). At 2 weeks post-repair there were no significant differences in muscle mass and torque recovery between the treatment groups, however we did observe a significant upregulation of MyoD (2.5 fold increase) and Pax7 (2 fold increase) gene expression as well as the presence of immature myofibers at the implant site for those animals repaired with aligned autografts. By 12 weeks post-repair, functional and structural differences between the treatment groups could be detected. Aligned autografts had significantly greater mass and torque recovery (77 ± 10% of normal) when compared to 45° and 90° misaligned autografts (64 ± 10% and 61 ± 11%, respectively). Examination of tissue structure revealed extensive fibrosis and a significant increase in non-contractile tissue area fraction for only those animals treated using misaligned autografts. When taken together, the results suggest that implant graft orientation has a significant impact on in-vivo outcomes and indicate that the effect of graft alignment on muscle phenotype may be mediated through genotypic changes to myogenesis and fibrosis at the site of injury and repair. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: A key event in the etiology of volumetric muscle loss injury is the bulk loss of architectural cues provided by the underlying extracellular matrix. To re-establish the lost cues, there is broad consensus within the literature supporting the utilization of implantable scaffolding. Yet, although native muscle is a highly organized tissue with network and cellular alignment in the direction of contraction, there is little evidence within the field concerning the importance of re-establishing native architectural alignment. The results of this study suggest that critical interactions exist between implant and native muscle alignment cues during healing, which influence the balance between myogenesis and fibrosis. Specifically, it appears that alignment of implant architectural cues with native muscle cues is necessary to create a pro-myogenic environment and contractile force recovery. The results also suggest that misaligned cues may be pathological, leading to fibrosis and poor contractile force recovery.

Dataset Information

Early rehabilitation for volumetric muscle loss injury augments endogenous regenerative aspects of muscle strength and oxidative capacity.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Early rehabilitation for volumetric muscle loss injury augments endogenous regenerative aspects of muscle strength and oxidative capacity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets