Dataset Information

Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?

ABSTRACT: Conversion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection has been associated with worse outcome, but this might have been related to a learning curve effect. This study aimed to evaluate incidence, predictive factors and outcomes of laparoscopic conversion after the implementation phase of laparoscopic surgery at a population level. Patients undergoing elective resection of non-locally advanced, non-metastatic colorectal cancer between 2011 and 2015 were included. Data were extracted from the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Patients were grouped as laparoscopic completed (LR), laparoscopic converted (CONV) with further specification of timing (within or after 30 min) as registered in the DSCA, and open resection (OR). Uni- and multi-variate analyses were used to determine predictors of conversion and outcome (complicated course and mortality), with evaluation of trends over time. A total of 23,044 patients with colon cancer and 11,324 with rectal cancer were included. Between 2011 and 2015, use of laparoscopy increased from 55 to 84% in colon cancer, and from 49 to 89% in rectal cancer. Conversion rates decreased from 11.8 to 8.6% and from 13 to 8.0%, respectively. Laparoscopic hospital volume was independently associated with conversion rate. Only for colon cancer, the rate of complicated course was significantly higher after CONV compared to OR (adjusted odds ratio 1.486; 95% CI 1.298-1.702), and significantly higher after late (>?30 min) compared to early conversion (adjusted odds ratio 1.341; 1.046-1.719). There was no impact of CONV on mortality in both colon and rectal cancer. The use of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery increased to more than 80% at a national level, accompanied by a decrease in conversion which is significantly related to the laparoscopic hospital volume. Conversion was only associated with complicated course in colon cancer, especially when the reason for conversion consisted of an intra-operative complication, without affecting mortality.

SUBMITTER: de Neree Tot Babberich MPM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5988765 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?

de Neree Tot Babberich Michael P M MPM van Groningen Julia T JT Dekker Evelien E Wiggers Theo T Wouters Michel W J M MWJM Bemelman Willem A WA Tanis Pieter J PJ

Surgical endoscopy 20180117 7

Conversion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection has been associated with worse outcome, but this might have been related to a learning curve effect. This study aimed to evaluate incidence, predictive factors and outcomes of laparoscopic conversion after the implementation phase of laparoscopic surgery at a population level. Patients undergoing elective resection of non-locally advanced, non-metastatic colorectal cancer between 2011 and 2015 were included. Data were extracted from the Dutc ...[more]

PMID: 29344789

Similar Datasets

Project description:Fast-track surgery (FTS), a multimodal rehabilitation technique, has been recommended as surgical therapy for colorectal cancer. The objective of the present study was to compare the outcomes of FTS and conventional laparoscopic surgery. This study was a blinded randomized trial. A total of 70 patients with colorectal cancer were divided into two groups and underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection. The FTS group consisted of 31 patients and the control group consisted of 39 patients. Protocols for the treatment of the FTS group included skipping pre-operative mechanical bowel preparation, early restoration of diet and early post-operative ambulation. Outcome measures, length of hospital stay, post-operative surgical stress response [C-reactive protein (CRP)] and post-operative complications were compared between the two groups. The average length of total hospital stay for the FTS and the control groups was 5.9±0.8 and 10.9±1.3 days, respectively (P<0.05), and the length of post-operative hospital stay for the FTS and control group was 4.3±0.8 and 8.0±1.1 days, respectively. (P<0.05) First flatus time for the FTS and control groups was 1.6±0.8 and 2.5±0.9 days, respectively (P<0.05). Defecation time for the FTS and control groups was 2.2±0.7 and 4.5±0.7 days, respectively (P<0.05). The time to restoration of a solid diet also showed a significant difference between the FTS and control groups (1.1±0.3 vs. 3.6±0.9 days; P<0.05). Following surgery, due to post-operative surgical stress, the two groups CRP levels increased significantly, but the levels of the FTS group were lower than those of the conventional control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in post-operative complications between the FTS and control groups. This study confirms that FTS shortens hospital stay and accelerates the recovery of bowel function without increase of post-operative complications. FTS is safe, improves post-operative recovery and is a better option than conventional laparoscopic surgery for treating colorectal cancer patients.

Project description:BackgroundSeveral systematic reviews and meta-analyses populate the literature on the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. The utility of this body of work is unclear. The objective of this study was to synthesize all such systematic reviews in terms of clinical effectiveness, to appraise their quality, and to determine whether areas of duplication exist across reviews.MethodsSystematic reviews comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer were identified using a comprehensive search protocol (1991 to 2008). The primary outcome was overall survival. The methodological quality of reviews was appraised using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument. Abstraction and quality appraisal was carried out by two independent reviewers. Reviews were synthesized, and outcomes were compared qualitatively. A citation analysis was carried out using simple matrices to assess the comprehensiveness of each review.ResultsIn total, 27 reviews were included; 13 reviews included only randomized controlled trials. Rectal cancer was addressed exclusively by four reviews. There was significant overlap between review purposes, populations and, outcomes. The mean AMSTAR score (out of 11) was 5.8 (95% CI: 4.6 to 7.0). Overall survival was evaluated by ten reviews, none of which found a significant difference. Three reviews provided a selective meta-analysis of time-to-event data. Previously published systematic reviews were poorly and highly selectively referenced (mean citation ratio 0.16, 95% CI: 0.093 to 0.22). Previously published trials were not comprehensively identified and cited (mean citation ratio 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.65).ConclusionsNumerous overlapping systematic reviews of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer exist in the literature. Despite variable methods and quality, survival outcomes are congruent across reviews. A duplication of research efforts appears to exist in the literature. Further systematic reviews or meta-analyses are unlikely to be justified without specifying a significantly different research objective. This works lends support to the registration and updating of systematic reviews.

Project description:BackgroundRecent advancements in molecularly targeted chemotherapy for stage IV colorectal cancer have enabled the possibility of complete resection in primary colorectal cancer, which often involves distant liver or lung metastases, by aggressive surgical resection followed by multi-combination chemotherapy.Case descriptionA 73-year-old man treated previously for hyperuricemia, hypertension, and a dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysm was referred to us after an incidental finding of multiple liver masses on abdominal ultrasound during follow-up for the aneurysm. A detailed examination by contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a ring-enhancing mass larger than 5 cm in diameter in segment 3 of the liver and more than 6 low-density areas with total diameter of 1 to 2 cm in both lobes. A barium enema examination revealed a Borrmann type 2 lesion covering two-thirds of the circumference of the colon, with a 5-cm major axis in the rectosigmoid colon. Biopsy revealed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with stage IV rectal cancer. Because there was no intestinal obstruction, we administered 9 cycles of bevacizumab with capecitabine and oxaliplatin as chemotherapy. Subsequent diagnostic imaging revealed the metastatic lesions in liver segment 3 had reduced to 2 low-density areas with a diameter of 8 mm, and the other hepatic metastases had disappeared; the main tumor had flattened and shrunk. Therefore, we used hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) to perform anterior resection of the rectosigmoid colon and partial resection of liver segment 3 as conversion therapy. The patient was discharged 10 days after surgery. The rectal lesion was a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with a depth of invasion of p-MP and a spread of L0, V0, and pN0. The partial hepatectomy did not indicate viable cancer cells; only necrotic, lysed tissue was observed. Postoperative chemotherapy involved 4 cycles of bevacizumab with capecitabine and oxaliplatin. At more than 42 months postoperatively, no metastasis or recurrence has been observed.ConclusionsThis rare case demonstrates that conversion surgery can be a viable option following systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced colon cancer and H3 liver metastases.

Dataset Information

Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?

Publications

Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets