Dataset Information

Publication rates of podium and poster abstract presentations at the 2010 and 2011 society of gynecologic oncology conferences.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

This study aimed to determine the publication rate of oral and poster abstracts presented at the 2010 and 2011 Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) conferences as well as the journals that most commonly published these studies, their 5-year impact factor, the time to publication, and the reasons for nonpublication.

Methods

Abstracts presented at the 2010-2011 SGO conferences were included in this study. We searched Google, Google Scholar, and PubMed to locate published reports of these abstracts. If an abstract's full-text manuscript could not be located, an author of the conference abstract was contacted via email to inquire whether the research was published. If the research was unpublished, the authors were asked to provide the reason for nonpublication. The time to publication, journal, and journal impact factor were noted for abstracts that reached full-text publication.

Results

A total of 725 abstracts were identified, of which 386 (53%) reached publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Oral presentations were published at a higher rate than poster presentations. Most (70%) reached publication within 2?years of abstract presentation. Abstracts were published in 89 journals, but most (39%) were published in Gynecologic Oncology. The mean time to publication was 15.7?months, with a mean 5-year impact factor of 4.956.

Conclusions

A 53% publication rate indicates that the SGO conference selection process favors research likely to be published and, thus, presumably of high quality. The overall publication rate is higher than that reported for many other biomedical conferences.

SUBMITTER: Imani S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5993534 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Publication rates of podium and poster abstract presentations at the 2010 and 2011 society of gynecologic oncology conferences.

Imani Saba S Moore Gretchan G Nelson Nathan N Scott Jared J Vassar Matt M

Gynecologic oncology reports 20180203

<h4>Objective</h4>This study aimed to determine the publication rate of oral and poster abstracts presented at the 2010 and 2011 Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) conferences as well as the journals that most commonly published these studies, their 5-year impact factor, the time to publication, and the reasons for nonpublication.<h4>Methods</h4>Abstracts presented at the 2010-2011 SGO conferences were included in this study. We searched Google, Google Scholar, and PubMed to locate published ...[more]

PMID: 29892690

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAs state, regional, and national registries have rapidly expanded, the goal of this study is to assess the frequency of registry abstracts accepted for both podium and poster presentations at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons between 2012 and 2022.MethodsFinal programs and poster e-collections were examined over the past 11 years. Two reviewers evaluated each abstract to determine if they utilized large datasets and the location of each registry. Studies were excluded if they used institutional registries. Reviewers also identified the most frequently utilized registries to determine how their use has fluctuated over this time frame.ResultsA total of 3354 abstracts were reviewed and included. Of those, 577 abstracts utilized data obtained from orthopaedic registries (17.2%): 450 of which were poster presentations (16.5% of total poster acceptances), and 127 were podium presentations (20.5% of accepted podiums). The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was the most frequent dataset utilized, with 118 (20.5%) abstracts. Of note, NSQIP's use peaked between 2018 and 2020 and has since slowly trended downward. On the other hand, use of both American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) and PearlDiver registry have drastically increased since 2019, with only 6 abstracts chosen in 2019 and 28 abstracts in 2022 (10 AJRR [3 podiums] and 18 PearlDiver [6 podiums]). The proportion of registry data has increased, with the registry abstracts peaking in 2022 as 24% of posters and 37% of podium utilized data from large registry data sets (P < .001).ConclusionsThere has been a significant increase in the number of studies utilizing registry data for both podium and poster presentations at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons annual meeting. While NSQIP was the most utilized, its use has steadily declined while AJRR and PearlDiver use have increased over the past 3 years. Individuals should understand the strengths and weaknesses of each registry before making conclusions on study results.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Dataset Information

Publication rates of podium and poster abstract presentations at the 2010 and 2011 society of gynecologic oncology conferences.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Publication rates of podium and poster abstract presentations at the 2010 and 2011 society of gynecologic oncology conferences.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets