Dataset Information

The accessibility and utilization of genetic testing for inherited heart rhythm disorders: a Canadian cross-sectional survey study.

ABSTRACT: The genetic basis of many sudden death-related conditions has been elucidated. These include inherited arrhythmias and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, termed inherited heart rhythm disorders (IHRD). Advising on and interpreting genetic testing is challenging for the general cardiologist. This has led to the development of interdisciplinary clinics for IHRD in varying stages of establishment in Canada. We sought the viewpoints and patterns of practice of Canadian IHRD experts, and assessed their ability to access genetic testing for IHRD using a national cross-sectional survey. Of 56 participants, most were physicians (68%) or genetic counselors (19%). Despite working collaboratively, most genetic counselors (59%) were either not satisfied or only somewhat satisfied with their relationships with physicians. Ninety percent of participants were involved in offering genetic evaluation, including 80% who felt that testing was usually/always accessible. Most offered genetic testing to confirm clinical diagnosis and/or direct family screening. Post-mortem genetic analysis was sought by 69% of respondents; however, a lack of retained tissue and/or poor tissue preparation hindered this process. Family screening was usually recommended in the setting of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant. The most commonly perceived barrier to genetic testing was cost to the healthcare system. More than a quarter of patients waited ??6 months for funding. An ability to engage at-risk relatives was rated as limited/poor by 34% of participants. Despite the establishment of several interdisciplinary clinics, timely access to affordable testing, supported by strong team communication, continues to be a barrier to genetic testing in Canada.

SUBMITTER: Roston TM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6002300 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The accessibility and utilization of genetic testing for inherited heart rhythm disorders: a Canadian cross-sectional survey study.

Roston Thomas M TM Dewar Laura L Franciosi Sonia S Hathaway Julie J Bartels Kirsten K Cunningham Taylor T Gibbs Karen A KA Sheps Sam S Laksman Zachary W M ZWM Sanatani Shubhayan S Krahn Andrew D AD

Journal of community genetics 20171123 3

The genetic basis of many sudden death-related conditions has been elucidated. These include inherited arrhythmias and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, termed inherited heart rhythm disorders (IHRD). Advising on and interpreting genetic testing is challenging for the general cardiologist. This has led to the development of interdisciplinary clinics for IHRD in varying stages of establishment in Canada. We sought the viewpoints and patterns of practice of Canadian IHRD experts, and assessed their ...[more]

PMID: 29170972

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCardiovascular disease continues to be the leading cause of death globally. Clinical practice guidelines aimed at improving disease management and positively impacting major cardiac adverse events recommend genetic testing for inherited cardiovascular conditions such as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), long QT syndrome (LQTS), hereditary amyloidosis, and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH); however, little is known about how consistently practitioners order genetic testing for these conditions in routine clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the adoption of guideline-directed genetic testing for patients diagnosed with DCM, HCM, LQTS, hereditary amyloidosis, or FH.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study captured real-world evidence of genetic testing from ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes, procedure codes, and structured text fields of de-identified patient records in the Veradigm Health Insights Ambulatory EHR Research Database linked with insurance claims data. Data analysis was conducted using an automated electronic health record analysis engine. Patient records in the Veradigm database were sourced from more than 250,000 clinicians serving over 170 million patients in outpatient primary care and specialty practice settings in the United States and linked insurance claims data from public and private insurance providers. The primary outcome measure was evidence of genetic testing within six months of condition diagnosis.ResultsBetween January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021, 224,641 patients were newly diagnosed with DCM, HCM, LQTS, hereditary amyloidosis, or FH and included in this study. Substantial genetic testing care gaps were identified. Only a small percentage of patients newly diagnosed with DCM (827/101,919; 0.8%), HCM (253/15,507; 1.6%), LQTS (650/56,539; 1.2%), hereditary amyloidosis (62/1,026; 6.0%), or FH (718/49,650; 1.5%) received genetic testing.ConclusionsGenetic testing is underutilized across multiple inherited cardiovascular conditions. This real-world data analysis provides insights into the delivery of genomic healthcare in the United States and suggests genetic testing guidelines are rarely followed in practice.

Project description:BackgroundSubstantial changes in abortion care regulations, available medications and national clinical practice guidelines have occurred since a 2012 national Canadian Abortion Provider Survey (CAPS). We developed and piloted the CAPS 2019 survey instrument to explore changes of the abortion provider workforce, their clinical care as well as experiences with stigma and harassment.MethodsWe undertook development and piloting in three phases: (1) development of the preliminary survey sections and questions based on the 2012 survey instrument, (2) content validation and feasibility of including certain content aspects via a modified Delphi Method with panels of clinical and research experts, and (3) pilot testing of the draft survey for face validity and clarity of language; assessing usability of the web-based Research Electronic Data Capture platform including the feasibility of complex skip pattern functionality. We performed content analysis of phase 2 results and used a general inductive approach to identify necessary survey modifications.ResultsIn phase 1, we generated a survey draft that reflected the changes in Canadian abortion care regulations and guidelines and included questions for clinicians and administrators providing first and second trimester surgical and medical abortion. In phase 2, we held 6 expert panel meetings of 5-8 participants each representing clinicians, administrators and researchers to provide feedback on the initial survey draft. Due to the complexity of certain identified aspects, such as interdisciplinary collaboration and interprovincial care delivery differences, we revised the survey sections through an iterative process of meetings and revisions until we reached consensus on constructs and questions to include versus exclude for not being feasible. In phase 3, we made minor revisions based on pilot testing of the bilingual, web-based survey among additional experts chosen to be widely representative of the study population. Demonstrating its feasibility, we included complex branching and skip pattern logic so each respondent only viewed applicable questions based on their prior responses.ConclusionsWe developed and piloted the CAPS 2019 survey instrument suitable to explore characteristics of a complex multidisciplinary workforce, their care and experience with stigma on a national level, and that can be adapted to other countries.

Project description:BackgroundMany primary care patients receive both medical and chiropractic care; however, interprofessional relations between physicians and chiropractors are often suboptimal which may adversely affect care of shared patients. We surveyed Canadian family physicians in 2010 to explore their attitudes towards chiropractic and re-administered the same survey a decade later to explore for changes in attitudes.MethodsA 50-item survey administered to a random sample of Canadian family physicians in 2010, and again in 2019, that inquired about demographic variables, knowledge and use of chiropractic. Imbedded in our survey was a 20-item chiropractic attitude questionnaire (CAQ); scores could range from 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes toward chiropractic. We constructed a multivariable regression model to explore factors associated with CAQ scores.ResultsAmong eligible physicians, 251 of 685 in 2010 (37% response rate) and 162 of 2429 in 2019 (7% response rate) provided a completed survey. Approximately half of respondents (48%) endorsed a positive impression of chiropractic, 27% were uncertain, and 25% held negative views. Most respondents (72%) referred at least some patients for chiropractic care, mainly due to patient request or lack of response to medical care. Most physicians believed that chiropractors provide effective therapy for some musculoskeletal complaints (84%) and disagreed that chiropractic care was beneficial for non-musculoskeletal conditions (77%). The majority agreed that chiropractic care was a useful supplement to conventional care (65%) but most respondents (59%) also indicated that practice diversity among chiropractors presented a barrier to interprofessional collaboration. In our adjusted regression model, attitudes towards chiropractic showed trivial improvement from 2010 to 2019 (0.31 points on the 80-point CAQ; 95%CI 0.001 to 0.62). More negative attitudes were associated with older age (- 1.55 points for each 10-year increment from age 28; 95%CI - 2.67 to - 0.44), belief that adverse events are common with chiropractic care (- 1.41 points; 95% CI - 2.59 to - 0.23) and reported use of the research literature (- 6.04 points; 95% CI - 8.47 to - 3.61) or medical school (- 5.03 points; 95% CI - 7.89 to - 2.18) as sources of knowledge on chiropractic. More positive attitudes were associated with endorsing a relationship with a specific chiropractor (5.24 points; 95% CI 2.85 to 7.64), family and friends (4.06 points; 95% CI 1.53 to 6.60), or personal treatment experience (4.63 points; 95% CI 2.14 to 7.11) as sources of information regarding chiropractic.ConclusionsAlthough generally positive, Canadian family physicians' attitudes towards chiropractic are diverse, and most physicians felt that practice diversity among chiropractors was a barrier to interprofessional collaboration.

Dataset Information

The accessibility and utilization of genetic testing for inherited heart rhythm disorders: a Canadian cross-sectional survey study.

Publications

The accessibility and utilization of genetic testing for inherited heart rhythm disorders: a Canadian cross-sectional survey study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets