Dataset Information

Clinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis.

ABSTRACT: Background:Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) is common after appendectomy. This study aims to determine a clinical prediction score for SSI after appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Methods:Data from randomized controlled trial of delayed versus primary wound closures in complicated appendicitis was used. Nineteen patient- and operative-related predictors were selected in the logit model. Clinical prediction score was then constructed using coefficients of significant predictors. Risk stratification was done by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Bootstrap technique was used to internal validate the score. Results:Among 607 patients, the SSI incidence was 8.7% (95% CI 6.4, 11.2). Four predictors were significantly associated with SSI, i.e., presence of diabetes, incisional length >?7 cm, fecal contamination, and operative time >?75 min with the odds ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.2, 5.9), 2.8 (1.5, 5.4), 3.6 (1.9, 6.8), and 3.4 (1.8, 6.5), respectively. Clinical prediction score ranged from 0 to 4.5 with its discrimination concordance (C) statistic of 0.74 (95% CI 0.66, 0.81). Risk stratification classified patients into very low, low, moderate, and high risk groups for SSI when none, one, two, and more than two risk factors were presented with positive likelihood ratio of 1.00, 1.45, 3.32, and 9.28, respectively. A bootstrap demonstrated well calibration and thus good internal validation. Conclusions:Diabetes, incisional length, fecal contamination, and operative time could be used to predict SSI with acceptable discrimination. This clinical risk prediction should be useful in prediction of SSI. However, external validation should be performed. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT01659983), registered August 8, 2012.

SUBMITTER: Noorit P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6006790 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis.

Noorit Pinit P Siribumrungwong Boonying B Thakkinstian Ammarin A

World journal of emergency surgery : WJES 20180618

<h4>Background</h4>Superficial surgical site infection (SSI) is common after appendectomy. This study aims to determine a clinical prediction score for SSI after appendectomy in complicated appendicitis.<h4>Methods</h4>Data from randomized controlled trial of delayed versus primary wound closures in complicated appendicitis was used. Nineteen patient- and operative-related predictors were selected in the logit model. Clinical prediction score was then constructed using coefficients of significan ...[more]

PMID: 29946346

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common complications after appendectomy, which carries high associated morbidity. Therefore, it is essential to determine SSI predictive factors in order to prevent its occurrence. The aim of this study is to explore the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of SSI after appendectomy in children.MethodsA single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed in children who underwent appendectomy between 2017-2020. Demographics, time since symptoms onset, laboratory tests at admission, ultrasound appendiceal diameter, rate of complicated appendicitis, surgical aproach, surgery time and SSI rate were analyzed. Follow-up was performed during hospitalization and at outpatient clinic at 2 weeks and 30 days postoperatively to assess the surgical wound aspect. Diagnostic cut-off values of these markers for SSI prediction were based on the significance in the univariate analysis. Variables with a P value <0.05 in the univariate analysis were then entered into the multivariate analysis.ResultsA total of 1,136 patients (710 males; 426 females) were included. SSI was reported in 53 patients (4.7%) during the 30-day follow-up after appendectomy (SSI group), with no demographic differences with the control group. Time since symptoms onset was significantly higher in SSI group (24 vs. 18 hours; P=0.034), as well as ultrasound appendiceal diameter (10.5 vs. 8.5 mm; P=0.010). Complicated appendicitis was observed in about 60% of both groups, without differences in surgical approach between them. Surgery time was statistically higher in the SSI group (62.4 vs. 47.9 min; P<0.001). SSI group presented higher counts of leukocytes, neutrophils and NLR than control group (P<0.001). NLR was the parameter with the highest area under the curve (AUC) (AUC =0.808; P<0.001), with a cut-off point of 9.8 with maximum sensitivity (77.8%) and specificity (72.7%). NLR was an independent predictive factor for SSI in the multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR) 1.82 (1.13-2.73); P<0.01].ConclusionsNLR value at admission was the most promising predictive factor for the development of SSI in children undergoing appendectomy. It is an easy, simple, inexpensive, and rapid method to detect patients at high risk for SSI. However, further prospective studies are still needed to confirm these results.

Project description:IntroductionSurgical site infections (SSIs) are one of the most common postoperative complications after appendectomy leading to recurrent surgery, prolonged hospital stay, and the use of antibiotics. Numerous studies and meta-analyses have been published on the effect of open versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) reporting faster postoperative recovery and less postoperative pain for CLA. A development from CLA has been the single-port appendectomy (SPA), associated with a better cosmesis but seemingly having a higher risk of wound infections. The aim of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to investigate whether reduced port or SPA alters the ratio of SSIs.MethodsPubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened for suitable articles. All articles published between January 1, 2002, and March 23, 2022, were included. Articles regarding children below the age of 18 were excluded as well as manuscripts that investigated solemnly open appendectomies. Articles were screened for inclusion criteria by two independent authors. Incidence of SSI was the primary outcome. Duration of operation and length of hospital stay were defined as secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 25 studies were found through a database search describing 5484 patients. A total of 2749 patients received SPA and 2735 received CLA. There was no statistical difference in the rate of SSI (P = 0.98). A total of 22 studies including 4699 patients reported the duration of operation (2223 SPA and 2476 CLA). There was a significantly shorter operation time seen in CLA. The length of hospital stay was reported in 23 studies (4735 patients: 2235 SPA and 2500 CLA). A shorter hospital stay was seen in the SPA group (P < 0.00001). Separately performed analysis of randomized controlled trials could not confirm this effect (P = 0.29).DiscussionSPA is an equally safe procedure considering SSI compared to CLA and does not lead to an increased risk of SSI. A longer operation time for SPA and a minor difference in the length of stay does lead to the use of SPA in selected patients only.

Dataset Information

Clinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis.

Publications

Clinical prediction score for superficial surgical site infection after appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets