Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

A meta-analysis approach with filtering for identifying gene-level gene-environment interactions.

ABSTRACT: There is a growing recognition that gene-environment interaction (G × E) plays a pivotal role in the development and progression of complex diseases. Despite a wealth of genetic data on various complex diseases/traits generated from association and sequencing studies, detecting G × E via genome-wide analysis remains challenging due to power issues. In genome-wide G × E studies, a common strategy to improve power is to first conduct a filtering test and retain only the genetic variants that pass the filtering step for subsequent G × E analyses. Two-stage, multistage, and unified tests have been proposed to jointly consider the filtering statistics in G × E tests. However, such G × E tests based on data from a single study may still be underpowered. Meanwhile, large-scale consortia have been formed to borrow strength across studies and populations. In this work, motivated by existing single-study G × E tests with filtering and the needs for meta-analysis G × E approaches based on consortia data, we propose a meta-analysis framework for detecting gene-based G × E effects, and introduce meta-analysis-based filtering statistics in the gene-level G × E tests. Simulations demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method-the ofGEM test. We apply the proposed tests to existing data from two breast cancer consortia to identify the genes harboring genetic variants with age-dependent penetrance (i.e., gene-age interaction effects). We develop an R software package ofGEM for the proposed meta-analysis tests.

SUBMITTER: Wang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6013347 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Identifying gene-environment and gene-gene interactions using a progressive penalization approach.

Project description:In genomic studies, identifying important gene-environment and gene-gene interactions is a challenging problem. In this study, we adopt the statistical modeling approach, where interactions are represented by product terms in regression models. For the identification of important interactions, we adopt penalization, which has been used in many genomic studies. Straightforward application of penalization does not respect the "main effect, interaction" hierarchical structure. A few recently proposed methods respect this structure by applying constrained penalization. However, they demand very complicated computational algorithms and can only accommodate a small number of genomic measurements. We propose a computationally fast penalization method that can identify important gene-environment and gene-gene interactions and respect a strong hierarchical structure. The method takes a stagewise approach and progressively expands its optimization domain to account for possible hierarchical interactions. It is applicable to multiple data types and models. A coordinate descent method is utilized to produce the entire regularized solution path. Simulation study demonstrates the superior performance of the proposed method. We analyze a lung cancer prognosis study with gene expression measurements and identify important gene-environment interactions.

| S-EPMC4356212 | biostudies-literature

An empirical comparison of meta-analysis and mega-analysis of individual participant data for identifying gene-environment interactions.

Project description:For analysis of the main effects of SNPs, meta-analysis of summary results from individual studies has been shown to provide comparable results as "mega-analysis" that jointly analyzes the pooled participant data from the available studies. This fact revolutionized the genetic analysis of complex traits through large GWAS consortia. Investigations of gene-environment (G×E) interactions are on the rise since they can potentially explain a part of the missing heritability and identify individuals at high risk for disease. However, for analysis of gene-environment interactions, it is not known whether these methods yield comparable results. In this empirical study, we report that the results from both methods were largely consistent for all four tests; the standard 1 degree of freedom (df) test of main effect only, the 1 df test of the main effect (in the presence of interaction effect), the 1 df test of the interaction effect, and the joint 2 df test of main and interaction effects. They provided similar effect size and standard error estimates, leading to comparable P-values. The genomic inflation factors and the number of SNPs with various thresholds were also comparable between the two approaches. Mega-analysis is not always feasible especially in very large and diverse consortia since pooling of raw data may be limited by the terms of the informed consent. Our study illustrates that meta-analysis can be an effective approach also for identifying interactions. To our knowledge, this is the first report investigating meta-versus mega-analyses for interactions.

| S-EPMC4332385 | biostudies-literature

Identifying gene-environment interactions incorporating prior information.

Project description:For many complex diseases, gene-environment (G-E) interactions have independent contributions beyond the main G and E effects. Despite extensive effort, it still remains challenging to identify G-E interactions. With the long accumulation of experiments and data, for many biomedical problems of common interest, there are existing studies that can be relevant and informative for the identification of G-E interactions and/or main effects. In this study, our goal is to identify G-E interactions (as well as their corresponding main G effects) under a joint statistical modeling framework. Significantly advancing from the existing studies, a quasi-likelihood-based approach is developed to incorporate information mined from the existing literature. A penalization approach is adopted for identification and selection and respects the "main effects, interactions" hierarchical structure. Simulation shows that, when the existing information is of high quality, significant improvement can be observed. On the other hand, when the existing information is less informative, the proposed method still performs reasonably (and hence demonstrates a certain degree of "robustness"). The analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data on cutaneous melanoma and glioblastoma multiforme demonstrates the practical applicability of the proposed approach and also leads to sensible findings.

| S-EPMC6533537 | biostudies-literature

Gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in meta-analysis of genetic association studies.

Project description:Extensive genetic studies have identified a large number of causal genetic variations in many human phenotypes; however, these could not completely explain heritability in complex diseases. Some researchers have proposed that the "missing heritability" may be attributable to gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Because there are billions of potential interaction combinations, the statistical power of a single study is often ineffective in detecting these interactions. Meta-analysis is a common method of increasing detection power; however, accessing individual data could be difficult. This study presents a simple method that employs aggregated summary values from a "case" group to detect these specific interactions that based on rare disease and independence assumptions. However, these assumptions, particularly the rare disease assumption, may be violated in real situations; therefore, this study further investigated the robustness of our proposed method when it violates the assumptions. In conclusion, we observed that the rare disease assumption is relatively nonessential, whereas the independence assumption is an essential component. Because single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are often unrelated to environmental factors and SNPs on other chromosomes, researchers should use this method to investigate gene-gene and gene-environment interactions when they are unable to obtain detailed individual patient data.

| S-EPMC4414456 | biostudies-literature

A penalized robust method for identifying gene-environment interactions.

Project description:In high-throughput studies, an important objective is to identify gene-environment interactions associated with disease outcomes and phenotypes. Many commonly adopted methods assume specific parametric or semiparametric models, which may be subject to model misspecification. In addition, they usually use significance level as the criterion for selecting important interactions. In this study, we adopt the rank-based estimation, which is much less sensitive to model specification than some of the existing methods and includes several commonly encountered data and models as special cases. Penalization is adopted for the identification of gene-environment interactions. It achieves simultaneous estimation and identification and does not rely on significance level. For computation feasibility, a smoothed rank estimation is further proposed. Simulation shows that under certain scenarios, for example, with contaminated or heavy-tailed data, the proposed method can significantly outperform the existing alternatives with more accurate identification. We analyze a lung cancer prognosis study with gene expression measurements under the AFT (accelerated failure time) model. The proposed method identifies interactions different from those using the alternatives. Some of the identified genes have important implications.

| S-EPMC4356211 | biostudies-literature

Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions With Robust Marginal Bayesian Variable Selection.

Project description:In high-throughput genetics studies, an important aim is to identify gene-environment interactions associated with the clinical outcomes. Recently, multiple marginal penalization methods have been developed and shown to be effective in G×E studies. However, within the Bayesian framework, marginal variable selection has not received much attention. In this study, we propose a novel marginal Bayesian variable selection method for G×E studies. In particular, our marginal Bayesian method is robust to data contamination and outliers in the outcome variables. With the incorporation of spike-and-slab priors, we have implemented the Gibbs sampler based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). The proposed method outperforms a number of alternatives in extensive simulation studies. The utility of the marginal robust Bayesian variable selection method has been further demonstrated in the case studies using data from the Nurse Health Study (NHS). Some of the identified main and interaction effects from the real data analysis have important biological implications.

| S-EPMC8693717 | biostudies-literature

Variance-component-based meta-analysis of gene-environment interactions for rare variants.

Project description:Complex diseases are often caused by interplay between genetic and environmental factors. Existing gene-environment interaction (G × E) tests for rare variants largely focus on detecting gene-based G × E effects in a single study; thus, their statistical power is limited by the sample size of the study. Meta-analysis methods that synthesize summary statistics of G × E effects from multiple studies for rare variants are still limited. Based on variance component models, we propose four meta-analysis methods of testing G × E effects for rare variants: HOM-INT-FIX, HET-INT-FIX, HOM-INT-RAN, and HET-INT-RAN. Our methods consider homogeneous or heterogeneous G × E effects across studies and treat the main genetic effect as either fixed or random. Through simulations, we show that the empirical distributions of the four meta-statistics under the null hypothesis align with their expected theoretical distributions. When the interaction effect is homogeneous across studies, HOM-INT-FIX and HOM-INT-RAN have as much statistical power as a pooled analysis conducted on a single interaction test with individual-level data from all studies. When the interaction effect is heterogeneous across studies, HET-INT-FIX and HET-INT-RAN provide higher power than pooled analysis. Our methods are further validated via testing 12 candidate gene-age interactions in blood pressure traits using whole-exome sequencing data from UK Biobank.

| S-EPMC8661424 | biostudies-literature

A forest-based approach to identifying gene and gene gene interactions.

Project description:Multiple genes, gene-by-gene interactions, and gene-by-environment interactions are believed to underlie most complex diseases. However, such interactions are difficult to identify. Although there have been recent successes in identifying genetic variants for complex diseases, it still remains difficult to identify gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. To overcome this difficulty, we propose a forest-based approach and a concept of variable importance. The proposed approach is demonstrated by simulation study for its validity and illustrated by a real data analysis for its use. Analyses of both real data and simulated data based on published genetic models show the effectiveness of our approach. For example, our analysis of a published data set on age-related macular degeneration (AMD) not only confirmed a known genetic variant (P value = 2E-6) for AMD, but also revealed an unreported haplotype surrounding single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs10272438 on chromosome 7 that was significantly associated with AMD (P value = 0.0024). These significance levels are obtained after the consideration for a large number of SNPs. Thus, the importance of this work is twofold: it proposes a powerful and flexible method to identify high-risk haplotypes and their interactions and reveals a potentially protective variant for AMD.

| S-EPMC2148267 | biostudies-literature

A penalized robust semiparametric approach for gene-environment interactions.

Project description:In genetic and genomic studies, gene-environment (G×E) interactions have important implications. Some of the existing G×E interaction methods are limited by analyzing a small number of G factors at a time, by assuming linear effects of E factors, by assuming no data contamination, and by adopting ineffective selection techniques. In this study, we propose a new approach for identifying important G×E interactions. It jointly models the effects of all E and G factors and their interactions. A partially linear varying coefficient model is adopted to accommodate possible nonlinear effects of E factors. A rank-based loss function is used to accommodate possible data contamination. Penalization, which has been extensively used with high-dimensional data, is adopted for selection. The proposed penalized estimation approach can automatically determine if a G factor has an interaction with an E factor, main effect but not interaction, or no effect at all. The proposed approach can be effectively realized using a coordinate descent algorithm. Simulation shows that it has satisfactory performance and outperforms several competing alternatives. The proposed approach is used to analyze a lung cancer study with gene expression measurements and clinical variables. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

| S-EPMC4715555 | biostudies-literature

On meta- and mega-analyses for gene-environment interactions.

Project description:Gene-by-environment (G × E) interactions are important in explaining the missing heritability and understanding the causation of complex diseases, but a single, moderately sized study often has limited statistical power to detect such interactions. With the increasing need for integrating data and reporting results from multiple collaborative studies or sites, debate over choice between mega- versus meta-analysis continues. In principle, data from different sites can be integrated at the individual level into a "mega" data set, which can be fit by a joint "mega-analysis." Alternatively, analyses can be done at each site, and results across sites can be combined through a "meta-analysis" procedure without integrating individual level data across sites. Although mega-analysis has been advocated in several recent initiatives, meta-analysis has the advantages of simplicity and feasibility, and has recently led to several important findings in identifying main genetic effects. In this paper, we conducted empirical and simulation studies, using data from a G × E study of lung cancer, to compare the mega- and meta-analyses in four commonly used G × E analyses under the scenario that the number of studies is small and sample sizes of individual studies are relatively large. We compared the two data integration approaches in the context of fixed effect models and random effects models separately. Our investigations provide valuable insights in understanding the differences between mega- and meta-analyses in practice of combining small number of studies in identifying G × E interactions.

| S-EPMC5775907 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data