Dataset Information

Identifying Patients With High Data Completeness to Improve Validity of Comparative Effectiveness Research in Electronic Health Records Data.

ABSTRACT: Electronic health record (EHR)-discontinuity, i.e., having medical information recorded outside of the study EHR system, is associated with substantial information bias in EHR-based comparative effectiveness research (CER). We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model identifying patients with high EHR-continuity to reduce this bias. Based on 183,739 patients aged ?65 in EHRs from two US provider networks linked with Medicare claims data from 2007-2014, we quantified EHR-continuity by mean proportion of encounters captured (MPEC) by the EHR system. We built a prediction model for MPEC using one EHR system as training and the other as the validation set. Patients with top 20% predicted EHR-continuity had 3.5-5.8-fold smaller misclassification of 40 CER-relevant variables, compared to the remaining study population. The comorbidity profiles did not differ substantially by predicted EHR-continuity. These findings suggest that restriction of CER to patients with high predicted EHR-continuity may confer a favorable validity to generalizability trade-off.

SUBMITTER: Lin KJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6026022 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Identifying Patients With High Data Completeness to Improve Validity of Comparative Effectiveness Research in Electronic Health Records Data.

Lin Kueiyu Joshua KJ Singer Daniel E DE Glynn Robert J RJ Murphy Shawn N SN Lii Joyce J Schneeweiss Sebastian S

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 20171010 5

Electronic health record (EHR)-discontinuity, i.e., having medical information recorded outside of the study EHR system, is associated with substantial information bias in EHR-based comparative effectiveness research (CER). We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model identifying patients with high EHR-continuity to reduce this bias. Based on 183,739 patients aged ≥65 in EHRs from two US provider networks linked with Medicare claims data from 2007-2014, we quantified EHR-continuity by mea ...[more]

PMID: 28865143

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesThis article presents a summary of audiological, general health, and hearing aid (HA) outcome data in a large sample of U.S. Veterans receiving HAs. The current article also provides the foundation for a series of papers that will explore relationships between a wide range of factors and HA outcomes.DesignThe patient sample is all (n = 731,213) patients for whom HAs were ordered between April 2012 and October 2014 through the U.S. Veterans Health Administration Remote Order Entry System. For these patients, Veterans Affairs electronic health records (EHRs) stored in various databases provided data on demographics, received diagnostic and procedure codes (2007 to 2017), audiometry, self-reported outcomes up to 6 months postfitting, and HA battery orders (to 2017). Data cleaning and preparation was carried out and is discussed with reference to insights that provide potential value to other researchers pursuing similar studies. HA battery order data over time was used to derive a measure of long-term HA use persistence. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample, comparative analyses against other data supported basic validity assessment, and bivariate analyses probed novel associations between patient characteristics and HA use persistence at 2 years postfitting.ResultsFollowing extensive cleaning and data preparation, the data show plausible characteristics on diverse metrics and exhibit adequate validity based on comparisons with other published data. Further, rates of HA use persistence are favorable when compared against therapy persistence data for other major chronic conditions. The data also show that the presence of certain comorbid conditions (Parkinson's disease, diabetes, arthritis, and visual impairment) are associated with significantly lower HA use persistence, as are prior inpatient admissions (especially among new HA recipients), and that increasing levels of multimorbidity, in general, are associated with decreasing HA use persistence. This is all despite the fact that deriving relevant audiological care-process variables from the available records was not straightforward, especially concerning the definition of the date of HA fitting, and the use of battery ordering data to determine long-term HA use persistence.ConclusionsWe have shown that utilizing EHRs in audiology has the potential to provide novel insights into clinical practice patterns, audiologic outcomes, and relations between factors pertaining to hearing and to other health conditions in clinical populations, despite the potential pitfalls regarding the lack of control over the variables available and limitations on how the data are entered. We thus conclude that research using EHRs has the potential to be an integral supplement to population-based and epidemiologic research in the field of audiology.

Project description:The objective was to compare case ascertainment, agreement, validity, and missing values for clinical research data obtained, processed, and linked electronically from electronic health records (EHR) compared to "manual" data processing and record abstraction in a cohort of out-of-hospital trauma patients.? This was a secondary analysis of two sets of data collected for a prospective, population-based, out-of-hospital trauma cohort evaluated by 10 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies transporting to 16 hospitals, from January 1, 2006, through October 2, 2007. Eighteen clinical, operational, procedural, and outcome variables were collected and processed separately and independently using two parallel data processing strategies by personnel blinded to patients in the other group. The electronic approach included EHR data exports from EMS agencies, reformatting, and probabilistic linkage to outcomes from local trauma registries and state discharge databases. The manual data processing approach included chart matching, data abstraction, and data entry by a trained abstractor. Descriptive statistics, measures of agreement, and validity were used to compare the two approaches to data processing.? During the 21-month period, 418 patients underwent both data processing methods and formed the primary cohort. Agreement was good to excellent (kappa = 0.76 to 0.97; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.49 to 0.97), with exact agreement in 67% to 99% of cases and a median difference of zero for all continuous and ordinal variables. The proportions of missing out-of-hospital values were similar between the two approaches, although electronic processing generated more missing outcomes (87 of 418, 21%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 17% to 25%) than the manual approach (11 of 418, 3%, 95% CI = 1% to 5%). Case ascertainment of eligible injured patients was greater using electronic methods (n = 3,008) compared to manual methods (n = 629).? In this sample of out-of-hospital trauma patients, an all-electronic data processing strategy identified more patients and generated values with good agreement and validity compared to traditional data collection and processing methods.

Dataset Information

Identifying Patients With High Data Completeness to Improve Validity of Comparative Effectiveness Research in Electronic Health Records Data.

Publications

Identifying Patients With High Data Completeness to Improve Validity of Comparative Effectiveness Research in Electronic Health Records Data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets