Unknown

Dataset Information

0

How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Cadence (steps/min) may be a reasonable proxy-indicator of ambulatory intensity. A summary of current evidence is needed for cadence-based metrics supporting benchmark (standard or point of reference) and threshold (minimums associated with desired outcomes) values that are informed by a systematic process. OBJECTIVE:To review how fast, in terms of cadence, is enough, with reference to crafting public health recommendations in adults. METHODS:A comprehensive search strategy was conducted to identify relevant studies focused on walking cadence and intensity for adults. Identified studies (n=38) included controlled (n=11), free-living observational (n=18) and intervention (n=9) designs. RESULTS:There was a strong relationship between cadence (as measured by direct observation and objective assessments) and intensity (indirect calorimetry). Despite acknowledged interindividual variability, ?100 steps/min is a consistent heuristic (e.g, evidence-based, rounded) value associated with absolutely defined moderate intensity (3 metabolic equivalents (METs)). Epidemiological studies report notably low mean daily cadences (ie, 7.7 steps/min), shaped primarily by the very large proportion of time (13.5 hours/day) spent between zero and purposeful cadences (<60 steps/min) at the population level. Published values for peak 1-min and 30-min cadences in healthy free-living adults are >100 and >70 steps/min, respectively. Peak cadence indicators are negatively associated with increased age and body mass index. Identified intervention studies used cadence to either prescribe and/or quantify ambulatory intensity but the evidence is best described as preliminary. CONCLUSIONS:A cadence value of ?100 steps/min in adults appears to be a consistent and reasonable heuristic answer to 'How fast is fast enough?' during sustained and rhythmic ambulatory behaviour. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT02650258.

SUBMITTER: Tudor-Locke C 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6029645 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review.

Tudor-Locke Catrine C   Han Ho H   Aguiar Elroy J EJ   Barreira Tiago V TV   Schuna John M JM   Kang Minsoo M   Rowe David A DA  

British journal of sports medicine 20180601 12


<h4>Background</h4>Cadence (steps/min) may be a reasonable proxy-indicator of ambulatory intensity. A summary of current evidence is needed for cadence-based metrics supporting benchmark (standard or point of reference) and threshold (minimums associated with desired outcomes) values that are informed by a systematic process.<h4>Objective</h4>To review how fast, in terms of cadence, is enough, with reference to crafting public health recommendations in adults.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive sear  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6337834 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8461976 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7654058 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5828000 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7877025 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6677301 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7288070 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7896743 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9277656 | biostudies-literature