Dataset Information

Component Placement Accuracy in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Improved with Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Will It Have an Effect on Outcomes?

ABSTRACT: Bell et al.'s "Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study" compared the accuracy of a robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using the MAKO Robotic Interactive Orthopedic Arm (RIO) system to a conventional UKA using standardized instrumentation. This review examines the authors' findings and their relevance to clinical practice. Bell et al. conclude that the MAKO RIO system leads to more accurate implantation of both the tibial and femoral components in UKA in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes. This well-designed, level I study suggests what many arthroplasty surgeons assume about robotic assistance, which admittedly is of unknown clinical significance at this time. Evaluating this article in the context of the current literature provides valuable insight into areas in need of future investigation. The effect of implant positioning on long-term clinical outcomes and implant survivorship remains unclear. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to determine the role of robotic-assisted arthroplasty in the future.

SUBMITTER: Rauck RC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6031529 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Component Placement Accuracy in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Improved with Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Will It Have an Effect on Outcomes?

Rauck Ryan C RC Blevins Jason L JL Cross Michael B MB

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery 20171211 2

Bell et al.'s "Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study" compared the accuracy of a robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using the MAKO Robotic Interactive Orthopedic Arm (RIO) system to a conventional UKA using standardized instrumentation. This review examines the authors' findings and their relevance to clinical practice. Bell et al. conclude that the MAKO RIO ...[more]

PMID: 29983665

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThere remains a paucity of clinical studies assessing how any differences in accuracy of implant positioning between robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RO UKA) and conventional jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (CO UKA) translate to patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, and implant survivorship. The objectives of this study are to compare accuracy of implant positioning, limb alignment, patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, implant survivorship, cost-effectiveness, and complications in CO UKA versus RO UKA. Computer navigation will be used to assess intraoperative knee kinematics in all patients undergoing CO UKA.Methods and analysisThis prospective randomised controlled trial will include 140 patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee arthritis undergoing primary UKA. Following informed consent, patients will be randomised to CO UKA (control group) or RO UKA (investigation group) at a ratio of 1:1 using an online random number generator. The primary objective of this study is to compare accuracy of implant positioning in CO UKA versus RO UKA. The secondary objectives are to compare the following outcomes between the two treatment groups: limb alignment, surgical efficiency, postoperative functional rehabilitation, functional outcomes, quality of life, range of motion, resource use, cost effectivness, and complications. Observers will review patients at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery to record predefined study outcomes pertaining to these objectives. Ethical approval was obtained from the London-Bloomsbury Research Ethics Committee, UK. The study is sponsored by University College London, UK.DiscussionThis study compares a comprehensive and robust range of clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes in CO UKA versus RO UKA. The findings of this study will provide an improved understanding of the differences in CO UKA versus RO UKA with respect to accuracy of implant positioning, patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, implant survivorship, cost-effectiveness, and complications.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04095637 . Registered on 19 September 2019.

Dataset Information

Component Placement Accuracy in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Improved with Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Will It Have an Effect on Outcomes?

Publications

Component Placement Accuracy in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Improved with Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Will It Have an Effect on Outcomes?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets