Dataset Information

Economic Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using an Aggressive Surgical Paradigm.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) remains controversial in the United States. Generalizability of existing trial results has been criticized because of less aggressive debulking procedures than commonly used in the United States. As a result, economic evaluations using input data from these trials may not accurately reflect costs and outcomes associated with more aggressive primary surgery. Using data from an ongoing trial performing aggressive debulking, we investigated the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of NACT versus PDS for AEOC. METHODS:A decision tree model was constructed to estimate differences in short-term outcomes and costs for a hypothetical cohort of 15,000 AEOC patients (US annual incidence of AEOC) treated with NACT versus PDS over a 1-year time horizon from a Medicare payer perspective. Outcomes included costs per cancer-related death averted, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Base-case probabilities, costs, and utilities were based on the Surgical Complications Related to Primary or Interval Debulking in Ovarian Neoplasms trial. Base-case analyses assumed equivalent survival; threshold analysis estimated the maximum survival difference that would result in NACT being cost-effective at $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay thresholds. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to characterize model uncertainty. RESULTS:Compared with PDS, NACT was associated with $142 million in cost savings, 1098 fewer cancer-related deaths, and 1355 life-years and 1715 QALYs gained, making it the dominant treatment strategy for all outcomes. In sensitivity analysis, NACT remained dominant in 99.3% of simulations. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy remained cost-effective at $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay thresholds if survival differences were less than 2.7 and 1.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:In the short term, NACT is cost-saving with improved outcomes. However, if PDS provides a longer-term survival advantage, it may be cost-effective. Research is needed on the role of patient preferences in tradeoffs between survival and quality of life.

SUBMITTER: Cole AL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6033676 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Economic Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using an Aggressive Surgical Paradigm.

Cole Ashley L AL Barber Emma L EL Gogate Anagha A Tran Arthur-Quan AQ Wheeler Stephanie B SB

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society 20180701 6

<h4>Objectives</h4>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) remains controversial in the United States. Generalizability of existing trial results has been criticized because of less aggressive debulking procedures than commonly used in the United States. As a result, economic evaluations using input data from these trials may not accurately reflect costs and outcomes associated with more aggressive primary surgery. Usin ...[more]

PMID: 29683880

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSarcopenia is commonly observed in patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, the effect of body composition changes-during primary debulking surgery (PDS) and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy-on outcomes of patients with advanced-stage EOC is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the association between body composition changes and outcomes of patients with stage III EOC treated with PDS and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy.MethodsPre-treatment and post-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of 139 patients with stage III EOC were analysed. All CT images were contrast-enhanced scans and were acquired according to a standardized protocol. The skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle radiodensity (SMD), and total adipose tissue index were measured using CT images obtained at the L3 vertebral level. Predictors of overall survival were identified using Cox regression models.ResultsThe median follow-up was 37.9 months. The median duration between pre-treatment and post-treatment CT was 182 days (interquartile range: 161-225 days). Patients experienced an average SMI loss of 1.8%/180 days (95% confidence interval: -3.1 to -0.4; P = 0.01) and SMD loss of 1.7%/180 days (95% confidence interval: -3.3 to -0.03; P = 0.046). SMI and SMD changes were weakly correlated with body mass index changes (Spearman ? for SMI, 0.15, P = 0.07; ? for SMD, 0.02, P = 0.82). The modified Glasgow prognostic score was associated with SMI loss (odds ratio: 2.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-5.69; P = 0.04). The median time to disease recurrence was significantly shorter in patients with SMI loss ?5% after treatment than in those with SMI loss <5% or gain (5.4 vs. 11.2 months, P = 0.01). Pre-treatment SMI (1 cm2 /m2 decrease; hazard ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.11; P = 0.002) and SMI change (1%/180 days decrease; hazard ratio: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.08; P = 0.002) were independently associated with poorer overall survival. SMD, body mass index, and total adipose tissue index at baseline and changes were not associated with overall survival.ConclusionsSkeletal muscle index decreased significantly during treatment and was independently associated with poor overall survival in patients with stage III EOC treated with PDS and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The modified Glasgow prognostic score might be a predictor of SMI loss during treatment.

Dataset Information

Economic Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using an Aggressive Surgical Paradigm.

Publications

Economic Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using an Aggressive Surgical Paradigm.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets