Dataset Information

Use and Disclosure of Complementary Health Approaches in US Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.

ABSTRACT: Evidence indicates that use of Complementary Health Approaches (CHAs) is common in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and has benefits and risks. Yet, disclosure of CHA use to physicians is not uniformly high. The present study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of CHA use and disclosure in patients with CVD in a nationally representative US sample. Use of specific CHA modalities and the predictors and reasons for nondisclosure were examined. In the 2012 National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative sample of adults aged 18+ was used, and 12,364 patients who reported being diagnosed with CVD were analyzed using weighted bivariate and logistic regression. Analyses revealed that 34.75% of patients with CVD had used CHA in the previous year. Women, those with higher education and income, who had functional limitations, greater mental distress, and healthier lifestyles were significantly more likely to use CHA. Nonvitamin, nonmineral supplements was the most prevalent CHA used (19.22%). Rates of nondisclosure were highest among younger and better educated CHA users. In patients with CVD who did not disclose CHA use to their physician (33.67%), 45.51% said the reason was because physician did not ask; 8.75% said the reason was because they were not using CHA at the time. In conclusion, over 1/3 of patients with CVD used CHA in the previous year, and nonvitamin, nonmineral supplements were the most commonly used modality. The findings underscore the importance of provider-initiated communication about CHA use in patients with CVD to minimize the potentially harmful consequences of nondisclosure.

SUBMITTER: Sirois FM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6038945 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Use and Disclosure of Complementary Health Approaches in US Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.

Sirois Fuschia M FM Jiang Linghui L Upchurch Dawn M DM

The American journal of cardiology 20180329 1

Evidence indicates that use of Complementary Health Approaches (CHAs) is common in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and has benefits and risks. Yet, disclosure of CHA use to physicians is not uniformly high. The present study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of CHA use and disclosure in patients with CVD in a nationally representative US sample. Use of specific CHA modalities and the predictors and reasons for nondisclosure were examined. In the 2012 National Health Intervie ...[more]

PMID: 29685571

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective: There are no nationally representative studies using a probability sample that have been published examining whether physicians recommend complementary health approaches (CHAs) to their patients, as previous research has focused only on selected medical specialties or a particular U.S. region. This article fills a void in the current literature for robust data on recommendations for CHAs by office-based physicians in the United States. Design: Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analyses of physician-level data were from the 2012 Physician Induction Interview of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS PII), a nationally representative survey of office-based physicians. Weighted response rate among eligible physicians sampled for the 2012 NAMCS PII was 59.7%. Setting/Location: United States. Outcome measures: Recommendations by physicians to their patients for any CHA, and individual CHAs: massage therapy, herbs/nonvitamin supplements, chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation, yoga, acupuncture, and mind-body therapies. Differences in recommendations by physician demographic characteristics were identified. Results: Massage therapy was the most commonly recommended CHA (30.4%), followed by chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation (27.1%), herbs/nonvitamin supplements (26.5%), yoga (25.6%), and acupuncture (22.4%). The most commonly recommended CHAs by general/family practice physicians were chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation (54.0%) and massage therapy (52.6%). Of all U.S. physicians, 53.1% recommended at least one CHA to patients during the previous 12 months. Multivariable analyses found physician's sex, race, specialty, and U.S. region to be significant predictors of CHA recommendations. Female physicians were more likely than male physicians to recommend massage therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.40-2.20), herbs/nonvitamin supplements (aOR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.46-2.35), yoga (aOR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.70-2.75), acupuncture (aOR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.27-2.13), and mind-body therapies (aOR = 2.63, 95% CI = 2.02-3.41) to patients. Psychiatrists (aOR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.07-0.23), OB/GYNs (aOR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.24-0.60), and pediatricians (aOR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.18-0.38) were all less likely to recommend chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation than general and family practitioners. Conclusions: Overall, more than half of office-based physicians recommended at least one CHA to their patients. Female physicians recommended every individual CHA at a higher rate than male physicians except for chiropractic and osteopathic manipulation. These findings may enable consumers, physicians, and medical schools to better understand potential differences in use of CHAs with patients.

Project description:OBJECTIVES: To explore perceptions of health and illness, and the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), among people with type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD), and relate these to quality of life. DESIGN: A self-administered survey was delivered by mail and internet. The questionnaire was designed from data generated from qualitative research and other sources, to collect information on health-status, CAM use, and health and illness perceptions. Quality of life was compared among participants using Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-4D). SUBJECTS: Adults with type 2 diabetes and/or CVD residing in Victoria, Australia, whether or not they used CAM therapies as well as conventional medical treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons were made of AQoL-4D utility scores, demographic, health and wellbeing status, care-seeking and health management behaviors, and behavioral and illness perception variables. A range of descriptive statistical and predictive modeling techniques were used to assess significant associations (p<0.01) between CAM-user and non-user populations. RESULTS: From a sample of 2766 people, 45.1% had used CAM in the past 12 months and the remainder had never used CAM; ages ranged from 20-96 years. CAM-users tended to report lower (worse) quality of life measures than non-users, and a greater number of chronic conditions in addition to diabetes and CVD. Despite this, CAM-users reported their illness perception and behavioral change more positively than non-users. There was little difference between CAM and non-users in use of prescription medications despite CAM-users greater disease burden. CONCLUSION: Higher CAM use and low quality of life appear to reflect comorbidity and poor general health. Greater evidence is needed of how CAM use might support chronic illness prevention and complement chronic disease management, with important policy implications concerning the integration of CAM therapies with mainstream health services.

Project description:Objectives: Complementary health approaches include herbal products and mind-body practices. Several studies have identified predictors for complementary health approach use, yet there are two gaps: (1) How does use change? (2) Do factors associated with use influence this change over time? Using the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS), we examined how sociodemographic factors affected use longitudinally, and whether these associations differed between new and continued/discontinued use of herbal products, meditation, chiropractic, and massage therapy. Design: MIDUS is a national probability sample of adults aged 25 or older that has collected more than 20 years of longitudinal data, including the use of complementary health approaches. We employed the Andersen Model as a framework to identify predisposing, enabling, and health need factors associated with complementary health approach use based on previously identified and hypothesized factors. We ran Chi-square analyses to first test bivariate associations between our independent variables and four modalities to further guide logistic regression models. Results: Each of the four approaches examined saw substantial increases in prevalent use. However, only about 25% to 38% of individuals continued use from one wave to the next, whereas only 2%-9% of individuals who did not use a given approach in a wave reported use in the subsequent wave. Age, spiritual importance, and previous wave one use were all significantly associated with new use across all four modalities. Previous wave one use was associated with continued/discontinued use for all modalities. Age and education were significantly associated with discontinued use of chiropractic. Conclusion: We present the first longitudinal analysis of complementary health approaches in a nationally representative sample. These data distinguish between new and continued/discontinued use of complementary health approaches over time and provide insights into the interpretation of complementary health approach prevalence data, as well as important predictors of use.

Dataset Information

Use and Disclosure of Complementary Health Approaches in US Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.

Publications

Use and Disclosure of Complementary Health Approaches in US Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets