Dataset Information

Pathologic Response to Preoperative Therapy as a Novel Prognosticator for Ampullary and Duodenal Adenocarcinoma.

ABSTRACT: The prognostic impact of pathologic response to preoperative therapy on patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) and ampullary adenocarcinoma (AMPA) has not been established.A retrospective review of 266 patients who underwent curative resection for DA (n = 97) or AMPA (n = 169) during 1993-2015 was performed. For patients who underwent preoperative therapy, the pathologic response was systematically evaluated and classified as major (0-49% of viable residual tumor cells) or minor (? 50% of viable residual tumor cells). Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of pathologic response and disease-specific survival (DSS).For the 79 patients treated with preoperative therapy (DA: n = 34; AMPA: n = 45), concomitant use of radiation (80%, 67/79) was the sole independent predictor of major pathologic response (odds ratio [OR] 8.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-58.2; P = 0.005). The patients with major pathologic response had a better 5-year DSS rate than the patients with minor pathologic response (DA: 65 vs 25%; P = 0.028; AMPA: 85 vs 43%; P = 0.016). In the multivariable analysis of DSS for the 79 patients who underwent preoperative therapy, major pathologic response was the sole predictor of improved DSS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.88; 95% CI 1.41-5.98; P = 0.004). In the multivariable analysis of DSS for the entire cohort, pathologic stage 2 or lower was the sole predictor of better DSS.The major pathologic response to preoperative therapy predicted improved DSS after resection of DA and AMPA and might represent a new prognosticator after resection of DA and AMPA.

SUBMITTER: Yamashita S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6039188 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pathologic Response to Preoperative Therapy as a Novel Prognosticator for Ampullary and Duodenal Adenocarcinoma.

Yamashita Suguru S Overman Michael J MJ Wang Huamin H Zhao Jun J Okuno Masayuki M Goumard Claire C Tzeng Ching-Wei CW Kim Michael M Fleming Jason B JB Vauthey Jean-Nicolas JN Katz Matthew H MH Lee Jeffrey E JE Conrad Claudius C

Annals of surgical oncology 20171004 13

<h4>Background</h4>The prognostic impact of pathologic response to preoperative therapy on patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) and ampullary adenocarcinoma (AMPA) has not been established.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective review of 266 patients who underwent curative resection for DA (n = 97) or AMPA (n = 169) during 1993-2015 was performed. For patients who underwent preoperative therapy, the pathologic response was systematically evaluated and classified as major (0-49% of viable residual ...[more]

PMID: 28980211

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimsDuodenal polyps have a reported incidence of 0.3% to 4.6%. Sporadic, nonampullary duodenal adenomas (SNDAs) comprise less than 10% of all duodenal polyps, and ampullary adenomas are even less common. Nonetheless, the incidence continues to rise because of widespread endoscopy use. Duodenal polyps with villous features or those that are larger than 10 mm may raise concern for malignancy and require removal. We demonstrate endoscopic resection of SNDAs and ampullary adenomas using some of our preferred techniques.MethodsThe duodenum has several components that can make EMR of duodenal polyps technically challenging. Not only does the duodenum have a thin muscle layer, but it is also highly mobile and vascular, which may explain higher rates of perforation and bleeding of duodenal EMR reported in the literature compared with colon EMR. A standard adult gastroscope with a distal cap is commonly used for duodenal EMRs. Based on the location, however, side-viewing duodenoscopes or pediatric colonoscopes may be used. To prepare for EMR, a submucosal injection is performed for an adequate lift. The polyp is then resected via stiff monofilament snares and subsequently closed with hemostatic clips if feasible. The ampullectomy technique differs slightly from duodenal EMRs and carries the additional risk of pancreatitis. Submucosal injection in the ampulla may not lift well; thus, its utility is debatable. Biliary sphincterotomy should be performed, and based on endoscopist preference, the pancreatic duct (PD) guidewire can be left during resection to maintain access. After resection, a PD stent is placed to minimize pancreatitis risk.ResultsThe video shows the aforementioned duodenal EMR techniques. Two clips of ampullectomy are also shown in the video.ConclusionsA few common techniques used to perform duodenal EMR and ampullectomy are highlighted in the video. It is important to understand and manage adverse events associated with these procedures and to have established surveillance plans.

Project description:Endocrine therapy is commonly recommended in the adjuvant setting for patients as treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, it is unknown whether a neoadjuvant (preoperative) anti-estrogen approach to DCIS results in any biological change. This study was undertaken to investigate the pathologic and biomarker changes in DCIS following neoadjuvant endocrine therapy compared to a group of patients who did not undergo preoperative anti-estrogenic treatment to determine whether such treatment results in detectable histologic alterations.Patients (n = 23) diagnosed with ER-positive pure DCIS by stereotactic core biopsy were enrolled in a trial of neoadjuvant anti-estrogen therapy followed by definitive excision. Patients on hormone replacement therapy, with palpable masses, or with histologic or clinical suspicion of invasion were excluded. Premenopausal women were treated with tamoxifen and postmenopausal women were treated with letrozole. Pathologic markers of proliferation, inflammation, and apoptosis were evaluated at baseline and at three months.Biomarker changes were compared to a cohort of patients who had not received preoperative treatment.Median age of the cohort was 53 years (range 38-78); 14 were premenopausal. Following treatment, predominant morphologic changes included increased multinucleated histiocytes and degenerated cells, decreased duct extension, and prominent periductal fibrosis. Two postmenopausal patients had ADH only with no residual DCIS at excision. Postmenopausal women on letrozole had significant reduction of PR, and Ki67 as well as increase in CD68-positive cells. For premenopausal women on tamoxifen treatment, the only significant change was increase in CD68. No change in cleaved caspase 3 was found. Two patients had invasive cancer at surgery.Preoperative therapy for DCIS is associated with significant pathologic alterations. These changes may be clinically significant. Further work is needed to identify which women may be the best candidates for such treatment for DCIS, and whether best responders may safely avoid surgical intervention.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00290745.

Project description:PurposePreoperative radiation therapy (RT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma reduces positive surgical margin rates, and when delivered to an ablative dose range it may improve local control and overall survival for patients with unresectable disease. Use of stereotactic body RT to achieve a higher biologically effective dose has been limited by toxicity to adjacent radiosensitive structures, but this can be mitigated by stereotactic magnetic resonance image guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART).Methods and materialsWe describe our single-institution experience of high biologically effective dose SMART before resection of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Toxicity was evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V 5.0). Tumor response was evaluated according to the College of American Pathologists tumor regression grading criteria.ResultsWe analyzed 26 patients with borderline resectable (80.8%), locally advanced (11.5%), and resectable (7.7%) tumors who received ablative dose SMART (A-SMART) followed by surgical resection. Median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range, 34-86). Most patients received chemotherapy (80.8%) before RT. All patients received A-SMART to a median dose of 50 (range, 40-50) Gy in 5 fractions. Toxicity data were collected prospectively and there were no acute grade 2+ toxicities associated with RT. The median time to resection was 50 days (range, 37-115), and the procedure types included Whipple (69%), distal (23%), or total pancreatectomy (8%). The R0 resection rate was 96% and no perioperative deaths occurred within 90 days. Pathologic response was observed in 88% of cases. The time from RT to surgery was associated with tumor regression grade (P = .0003). The median follow-up after RT was 16.5 months (range, 3.9-26.2). The derived median progression-free survival from RT was 13.2 months.ConclusionsThe initial surgical and pathologic outcomes after A-SMART are encouraging. Preoperative A-SMART was associated with low toxicity rates and no surgical or RT-associated mortality. The surgical morbidity was comparable to historic rates after upfront resection. These data also suggest that the time from stereotactic body RT to surgical resection is associated with pathologic response.

Dataset Information

Pathologic Response to Preoperative Therapy as a Novel Prognosticator for Ampullary and Duodenal Adenocarcinoma.

Publications

Pathologic Response to Preoperative Therapy as a Novel Prognosticator for Ampullary and Duodenal Adenocarcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets