Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparative study of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM peeling technique in large macular holes: a randomized-control trial.


ABSTRACT:

Background

The anatomical success rate of macular hole surgery ranges around 93-98%. However, the prognosis of large macular holes is generally poor. The study was conducted to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) peeling vis-a-vis inverted ILM flap for the treatment of idiopathic large Full-Thickness Macular Holes (FTMH).

Methods

This was a prospective randomized control trial. The study included patients with idiopathic FTMH, with a minimum diameter ranging from 600 to 1500 ?m. The patients were randomized into Group A (ILM peeling) and Group B (inverted ILM flap). The main outcome measures were anatomical and visual outcome at the end of 6 months. Anatomical success was defined as flattening of macular hole with resolution of the subretinal cuff of fluid and neurosensory retina completely covering the fovea.

Results

There were 30 patients in each group. The mean minimum diameters in Group A and B were 759.97?±?85.01 ?m and 803.33?±?120.65 ?m respectively (p?=?0.113). The mean base diameter in group A and B was 1304.50?±?191.59 ?m and 1395.17?±?240.56 ?m respectively (p?=?0.112). The anatomical success rates achieved in Group A and B were 70.0 and 90.0% respectively (p?=?0.125). The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 6 months was logMAR 0.65?±?0.25 (Snellen equivalent, 20/89) in Group A and logMAR 0.53?±?0.20 (Snellen equivalent, 20/68) in Group B (p?=?0.060). The mean improvement in BCVA was 1.4 lines and 2.1 lines in groups A and B respectively (p?=?0.353). BCVA?20/60 was achieved by 13.3 and 20.0% in group A and B respectively (p?=?0.766).

Conclusion

The anatomical and functional outcome of Inverted ILM flap technique in large FTMH is statistically similar to that seen in conventional ILM peeling.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials Registry - India (Indian Medical Research) CTRI/2017/11/010474 .

SUBMITTER: Kannan NB 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6054750 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparative study of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM peeling technique in large macular holes: a randomized-control trial.

Kannan Naresh Babu NB   Kohli Piyush P   Parida Haemoglobin H   Adenuga O O OO   Ramasamy Kim K  

BMC ophthalmology 20180720 1


<h4>Background</h4>The anatomical success rate of macular hole surgery ranges around 93-98%. However, the prognosis of large macular holes is generally poor. The study was conducted to compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) peeling vis-a-vis inverted ILM flap for the treatment of idiopathic large Full-Thickness Macular Holes (FTMH).<h4>Methods</h4>This was a prospective randomized control trial. The study included patients with idiopathic FTMH, with a mini  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4998268 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6137144 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8487370 | biostudies-literature